[2026:RJ-JP:25267] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4203/2026 URN: CRLMB / 7452U / 2026 Bhanwar Singh Son Of Shri Jodhraj Singh, Aged About 41 Years, Resident Of Near Krishi Anusandhan Kendra, Farm-Wali Gali, Baran Road, Police Station Borkheda, Kota City, At Present Lodged In The Central Jail, Kota ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through The Public Prosecutor. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ashvin Garg For Respondent(s) For Complainant : : Ms. Manju Dave, PP Mr. Kunal Jaiman HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 07/07/2026 1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.264/2024 registered at Police Station Udyog Nagar (Kota City), District Kota City for offences under Sections 420 and 406 IPC. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor as well as learned counsel for the complainant and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. It is further submitted that, so far as the allegation against the present petitioner is concerned, the FIR specifically refers to Plot No. 5. It is an admitted position that the present petitioner is not the owner of Plot No. 5; rather, the owner of the said plot is Shyambihari. Learned counsel submits that, as per the material available on record, the amount [2026:RJ-JP:25267] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-4203/2026] in question has been received by the co-accused, Omprakash and Jorawar Singh, and that the present petitioner has not received any part of the said amount. Nothing has been recovered from the possession of the present petitioner. The petitioner has been in judicial custody since 21.02.2026. It is further submitted that the petitioner has four criminal antecedents, out of which three cases have already been decided. Charge-sheet has been filed. The case is exclusively triable by the Magistrate. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody, consequently, the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor and counsel for the complainant have vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in light of submissions made on behalf of petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner. 6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Bhanwar Singh Son Of Shri Jodhraj Singh, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J 15/Arun