Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jammu and Kashmir · body

2026 DAILYLAW 95 (JK)

DEEPMALA KOTWAL v. UT OF J AND K TH PRINCIPAL SECRTARY, HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE, JAMMU AND OTHERS

WP(C)/13/2026 · 2026-01-12

Sanjay Parihar

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU WP(C) No. 13/2026 CM No. 61/2026 Deepmala Kotwal …..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. Rajnish Singh Parihar, Advocate Vs U.T. of J&K and others .…. Respondent(s) Through: Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PARIHAR, JUDGE ORDER 12.01.2026 01. After arguing for a while, learned counsel for the petitioner fairly conceded that the petition is premature because representation of the petitioner for grant of registration as Medical Geneticist/Sonologist is under consideration before respondents 1 & 2 because respondents 3 & 4 have already forwarded the case to them in apropos to the direction passed by this Court in WP(C) No. 2199/2022 titled ‘Dr. Kuldeep Chander Sharma and Anr. Versus Union of India and Ors.’ He further submits that the petitioner would feel satisfied in case the petition is disposed of by directing the respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner within a reasonable period of time. 02. Given the nature of controversy involved and the prayer so made, this petition is disposed of by directing respondents 1 & 2 to consider the representation of the petitioner for grant of Sr. No. 44 2 WP(C) No. 13/2026 registration as Medical Geneticist/Sonologist, which has been forwarded to them by respondents 3 & 4 i.e. BMO, Bhaderwah and CMO, Doda respectively within a period of three months from the date of passing of this order, by passing a speaking order. 03. Disposed of as such. (Sanjay Parihar) Judge Jammu 12.01.2026 Mihul