Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9499 (UTT)

ANJALI CHAUHAN v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPSS/688/2026 · 2026-08-04

Pankaj Purohit

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

UKHC010033592026 2026:UHC:6815 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPSS/688/2026 Anjali Chauhan --Petitioner Versus State Of Uttarakhand --Respondent Hon'ble Pankaj Purohit, J. There is no representation for the petitioner. 2. Mr. S.S. Chaudhary, learned S.C. for the State. 3. This writ petition was filed on 27.02.2026. 4. A defect was pointed out by the Registry at the time of institution. On 09.03.2026, 15.04.2026, 14.05.2026 and 15.06.2026, petitioner was granted time to remove the said defect. Even then, when the defect was not removed, the matter was directed to be listed before the Court. 5. This Court, again on 24.07.2026, despite non- appearance on the part of petitioner, in the interest of justice, had granted almost two weeks’ time to remove the defect. Even today, there is no representation from the side of petitioner nor the defect has been removed. 6. In such view of the matter, writ petition is dismissed for non-compliance of order dated 24.07.2026. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 04.08.2026 R.Dang