Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9498 (ALL)

SATYENDRA KUMAR MAURYA v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

CRLRD/1886/2026 · 2026-09-20

Prashant Bilgaiyan Registrar J Criminal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL REVISION DEFECTIVE No. - 1886 of 2026 Court No. - 86 HON'BLE PRAVEEN KUMAR GIRI, J. 1. Learned counsel for the revisionist submits that he has preferred the instant criminal revision with the relief which has been mentioned in the prayer clause of the revision. 2. The relief which has been mentioned in the prayer clause is delineated below:- "It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to allow this criminal revision modifying the quantum of interim maintenance and reduce the same to be commensurate with the financial standing of the Revisionist." 3. Learned counsel for the revisionist submits that now the revisionist is no more, therefore, the revision may be treated as abated. 4. Accordingly, the revision is dismissed as abated. September 21, 2026 K.Tiwari Versus Counsel for Revisionist(s) : Aushim Luthra, Vedika Nath, Yashonidhi Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Praveen Kumar Giri,J.) Satyendra Kumar Maurya .....Revisionist(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- KRISHNA KANT TIWARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad