1 APHC010465502024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] THURSDAY, THE 3rd DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 24116/2024 Between: 1. G MAHAMMOOD, S/O G. RASOOL SAHEB, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, OCC- MANDAL PRESIDENT OF MANDAL PRAJA PARISBAD, PEDDA THIPPASAMUDRAM, R/O DOOR NO. 4-8-2, MADALAM STREET, PEDDA TBIPPASAMUDRAM VILLAGE 86 MANDAL, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE CBITTOOR DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP., BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PANCBAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPT. SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, AMARAVATBI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT AT RAYACBOTY, ERSTWHILE CBITTOOR DISTRICT 3. THE DISTRICT PANCBAYAT OFFICER, PEDDA TBIPPASAMUDRAM MANDAL, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE CHITTOOR DISTRICT 4. THE MANDAL PARISBAD DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, PEDDA TBIPPASAMUDRAM MANDAL, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE CBITTOOR DISTRICT 5. THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, ZILLA PRAJA PARISBAD, CBITTOOR, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT 6. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT AT RAYACHOTY 2 7. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, MADANAPALLE, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT 8. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, PEDDA TBIPPASAMUDRAM PS, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE CBITTOOR DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the Respondents herein particularly Respondent Nos. 6 to 8 in not providing the protection to the petitioner from the intruders who are interrupting the general body meetings held at the Mandal Praja Parishad Office, Pedda Thippasamudram Village And Mandal, Annamayya District and not taking any action against the intruders despite receiving the representations from the petitioner as nothing but illegal, arbitrary, high handed and violative of fundamental and constitutional rights guaranteed under articles 14, 19 And 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to give protection and to ensure that the general body meeting should be conducted in Mandal Praja Parishad Office, Pedda Thippasamudram Village And Mandal, Annamayya District and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to DIRECT the respondents to give protection and to ensure that the general body meeting should be conducted in Mandal Praja Parishad Office, Pedda Thippasamudram Village And Mandal, Annamayya District pending disposal of the Writ petition before this Hon’ble court, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SURESH KUMAR REDDY KALAVA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV 2. GP FOR HOME 3. Mattegunta Sudhir, Standing Counsel For Z.P.Ps, M.P.Ps, Gram Panchayats The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 24116 of 2024 ORDER:- The instant Writ Petition has been filed by the petitioner under Article 226 of Constitution of India seeking the following main prayer: “….to issue a of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the Respondents herein particularly Respondent Nos. 6 to 8 in not providing the protection to the petitioner from the intruders who are interrupting the general body meetings held at the Mandal Praja Parishad Office, Pedda Thippasamudram Village and Mandal, Annamayya District and not taking any action against the intruders despite receiving the representations from the petitioner as nothing but illegal, arbitrary, high handed and violative of fundamental and constitutional rights guaranteed under articles 14, 19 And 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to give protection and to ensure that the general body meeting should be conducted in Mandal Praja Parishad Office, Pedda Thippasamudram Village And Mandal, Annamayya District and pass….” 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri Suresh Kumar Reddy Kalava, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that in view of the subsequent events taken place in the lis, the cause in the writ petition does not survive for further adjudication. Accordingly, he submits that the matter has become infructuous. 3. Recording the above said submissions, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, all pending applications shall stand closed. ____________________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 03.09.2026 RMR 4 123 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 24116 of 2024 03.09.2026 W RMR