Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9492 (PAT)

Pappu Kumar Yadav @ Pappu Yadav v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./11325/2026 · 2026-02-23

Ramesh Chand Malviya

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.11325 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-326 Year-2025 Thana- RAJAON District- Banka ====================================================== 1. Pappu Kumar Yadav @ Pappu Yadav S/o Late Anandi Yadav Resident of village- Malti, Police station- Rajoun, District- Banka 2. Nitish Kumar Yadav @ Nitish Kumar S/o Subhit Yadav @ Sumit Lal Yadav Resident of village- Malti, Police station- Rajoun, District- Banka ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Balram Kapri, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Asha Devi, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHAND MALVIYA ORAL ORDER 2 23-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State 2. The petitioners apprehends their arrest in connection with Rajoun P.S Case No. 326 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 303(2), 352, 351(2), 117(2), 109 & Section 3(5) of B.N.S, 2023. 3. As per the prosecution case, accused persons assaulted the brothers of the informant and others by lathi, danda, khanti. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. It is next submitted that there is no repeated blow has been alleged Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11325 of 2026(2) dt.23-02-2026 2/3 against the petitioners nor injuries caused on vital part of the body. 5. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioners. 6. From perusal of the F.I.R., impugned order and materials available on record it appears that allegations against the petitioners are that brother of informant, namely, Mukesh Yadav has been assaulted and caused head injury by Nitish Kumar Yadav with khanti, another brother of informant, namely, Gautam Kumar Yadav has been assaulted and caused hand injury by Pappu Kumar Yadav with lathi, due to which hand was fractured, but the injury report does not support the allegation leveled by the informant. Injury is simple in nature. Further, no repeated blow has been alleged against the petitioners nor injuries caused on vital part of the body. 7. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, submissions made on behalf of the petitioners, let the above named petitioners be released on bail in the event of their arrest or surrender before the trial court within a period of six weeks from today on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned CJM, Banka in connection with Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11325 of 2026(2) dt.23-02-2026 3/3 Rajoun P.S Case No. 326 of 2025 subject to the condition laid down under Section 482(2) of B.N.S.S. Mayank/- (Ramesh Chand Malviya, J) U T