1 2026:CGHC:19609 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 6411 of 2022 * - Paras Ram Sahu S/o Shri Suklal Sahu Aged About 38 Years Teacher (Mathematics), R/o Village - Todgaon, Post - Godi, Tahsil - Aarang, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - The Joint Commissioner Development Commissioner Office, Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Senior Treasury Officer Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 4 - Additional Development Commissioner Development Commissioner Office, New Raipur Atal Nagar, Chhattisgarh 5 - District Education Officer Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 6 - Block Education Officer Arang, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents For Petitioner : Ms. Anjali Nair, Advocate holding the brief of Mr. Alok Pandey, Advocate For Respondents/State : Mr. T.L. Bareth, Panel Lawyer Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 28/04/2026 1. Ms. Anjali Nair, Advocate appears and submits that the petitioner has taken brief from Office. 2. The petitioner has filed this petition seeking the following relief(s):- “10.1 The Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for the entire records pertaining to the case from possession of the respondents for its kind perusal. Digitally signed by RAMESH KUMAR VATTI Date: 2026.04.28 18:42:13 +0530 2 10.2 The Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue a suitable writ/order/direction the respondent authorities to refund of revenue, regarding refund of one month’s deposit salary amount of Rs.37327/- after acceptance of technical resignation. 10.3 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to grant any other relief, as it may deem fit.” 3. Mr. T.L. Bareth, learned Panel Lawyer appearing for the State/respondents would submit that grievance of the petitioner has already been redressed. He would submit that the relief with regard to refund of one month’s salary Rs.37,327/- deposited by the petitioner has already been refunded and thus, this petition has become infructuous. He would contend that this fact is categorically pleaded in Para-3 of the return. 4. Heard. 5. Taking into consideration the prayer made by the petitioner and Para-3 of the return filed by the State, it appears that the grievance of the petitioner has already been redressed. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge vatti