Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9482 (ALL)

ARSHAD AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 3 OTHERS

CRLP/21152/2026 · 2026-09-17

Ajay Bhanot, Divesh Chandra Samant

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 21152 of 2026 Court No. - 49 HON'BLE AJAY BHANOT, J. HON'BLE DIVESH CHANDRA SAMANT, J. After some arguments Shri Sharda Prasad Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioners do not wish to press the relief for quashing of F.I.R. sought in the writ petition. The relief sought for quashing of the F.I.R. is accordingly declined. Shri Sharda Prasad Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioners recasts the relief and submits that the petitioners may be granted liberty to approach the competent court for anticipatory bail and for seeking other available legal remedies. The writ petition is disposed of with the observation that it is always open to the petitioners to avail other legal remedies as may be advised. Shri Satya Prakash Singh, learned counsel for the respondent 4 is present. September 18, 2026 Dhananjai Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sharda Prasad Mishra, Vipin Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Satya Prakash Singh (Divesh Chandra Samant,J.) (Ajay Bhanot,J.) Arshad And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of Uttar Pradesh And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- DHANANJAI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad