[2026:RJ-JP:25176] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8697/2026 URN: CRLMB / 15926U / 2026 Rahul S/o Shahzad, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Thalchana, Police Station Jurhara, District Deeg. (At Present Confined In District Jail, Deeg). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mukesh Kumar Saini For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 06/07/2026 1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.375/2025 registered at Police Station Jurhera, District Deeg for offences under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 317(5), 303(2), 308(2), 313, 61(2) (a) of BNS, 2023 and Section 66-D of IT Act, 2008. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He submits that no specific allegation has been levelled against the present petitioner except that a motorcycle found at the spot is alleged to belong to him. He further submits that co-accused Khalid has been granted the benefit of bail by this Court on 30.03.2026. He also submits that the other co-accused Soyal, ES Mohammad, Sahil and Tarif [2026:RJ-JP:25176] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-8697/2026] have also been enlarged on bail by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 24.03.2026. The case of the petitoiner is on better footing. Petitioner is behind the bars since 13.05.2026 without any criminal past. The investigation/trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody and on the ground of parity with other co-accused, the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in light of submission made on behalf of petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner. 6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Rahul S/o Shahzad, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Chandan/115