Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9467 (KAR)

MRS NIRMALA K v. THE BHARATH CO OPERATIVE BANK LTD

WP/4912/2023 · 2026-03-18

Lalitha Kanneganti

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:16074 WP No. 4912 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO. 4912 OF 2023 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: 1. MRS. NIRMALA K W/O LATE C.L. MUNIYAPPA AGED 60 YEARS NO. 114, BRINDAVANA NILAYA 1ST MAIN, 4TH CROSS, N.G.R LAYOUT ROOPENA AGRAHARA, BOMMANAHALLI BANGALORE - 560 068. 2. MR. JAYACHANDRA C.M. S/O LATE C.L. MUNIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS NO. 114, BRINDAVANA NILAYA 1ST MAIN, 4TH CROSS, N.G.R LAYOUT ROOPENA AGRAHARA, BOMMANAHALLI BANGALORE - 560 068. 3. MRS. JAYASHREE C.M, D/O LATE C.L. MUNIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS NO 114, BRINDAVANA NILAYA 1ST MAIN, 4TH CROSS, N.G.R LAYOUT ROOPENA AGRAHARA, BOMMANAHALLI BANGALORE - 560 068. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. RAMA MOORTHY B.V, ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by SUVARNA T Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:16074 WP No. 4912 of 2023 AND: 1. THE BHARATH CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., REP. BY ITS MANAGER NO. 30,15THC ROSS 3RD BLOCK, JAYANAGAR BANGALORE - 560 011. 2. THE AUTHORIZED OFFICER/MANAGER THE BHARATH CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., NO 30, 15TH CROSS, 3RD BLOCK JAYANAGAR, BANGALORE - 560 011. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. GANESH H. KEMPANNA, ADVOCATE) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED NOTICE DT 15.11.2022 ISSUED BY THE R-2 AUTHORIZED OFFICER BHARATH CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD VIDE NO.,.BCB/033/2022-23 AS PER ANNX-C BY WAY OF WRIT OF CERERTATORI AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:16074 WP No. 4912 of 2023 ORAL ORDER Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the writ petition has become infructuous. 2. The said submission is taken on record. 3. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. 4. All pending IAs, if any, in the petition shall stand closed. SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE SMC List No.: 1 Sl No.: 8