[2026:RJ-JP:24559-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Habeas Corpus Petition No. 206/2026 URN: HC / 563U / 2026 Pirumal Vaishnav, Son Of Late Shri Kanadas, Aged About 60 Years, Resident Of Plot No. A-1, R.k. Vatika City Fourth, Simlya Road, Sanganer, P.s. Sanganer Sadar, Jaipur (Rajasthan) ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Home Secretary, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur 2. Additional Director General Of Police (Crime), Police Headquarters, Jaipur (Rajasthan) 3. Director General Of Police (Rajasthan), Police Headquarters, Jaipur, Rajasthan 4. Station House Officer, Police Station -Sanganer Sadar, Jaipur, Rajasthan 5. Deputy Commissioner Of Police, Jaipur City (South), Jaipur (Rajasthan) 6. Additional Director General Of Police, Anti-Human Trafficking Unit, Jaipur 7. Sitaram Vaishav, Son Of Shri Ashok Vaishnav, Resident Of Village Fuliya Kalan, Mali Mohalla, Dist. Bhilwara (Rajasthan) 8. Hemraj Vaishnav, Son Of Nanaram, Resident Of Resident Of Village Fuliya Kalan, Mali Mohalla, Dist. Bhilwara (Rajasthan) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Satyam Khandelwal Mr. Bhuvneshwar Singh Shekhawat For Respondent(s) : Mr.Rajesh Choudhary, GA-cum-AAG Ms. Neha Goyal Mr. Aman Kumar Mr. Anil Jaiman, Inspector, SHO Sanganer, Sadar, Jaipur (S) Mr. Rekha, Belt No.10980 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL [2026:RJ-JP:24559-DB] (2 of 2) [HC-206/2026] Order 02/07/2026 This habeas corpus petition has been filed by the petitioner (grandfather) of the corpus. Today, the concerned police officer has produced the corpus i.e. four minor girls. We have intracted with them, they have stated before us that they want to live with maternal grandparents and maternal uncle. Considering the statement made by the children before us and also considering the fact that after death of their parents, they are living with their maternal grandparents and their maternal uncle and two of them are going to school at their place. In that view of the matter, we are of the considered view that the children are not in any illegal detention by anyone. Hence, this habeas corpus petition stands dismissed. However, the petitioner is at liberty to take legal remedy with regard to custody of the children, if so advised. (BHUWAN GOYAL),J (INDERJEET SINGH),J JYOTI/4