Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9461 (RAJ)

SMT. BABLI W/O LATE RAMCHARAN v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

SOSA/363/2026 · 2026-07-02

Bhuwan Goyal, Inderjeet Singh

Criminal Appealbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:24570-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Criminal Misc. Suspension Of Sentence Application No. 363/2026 URN: SOSA / 746U / 2026 in D. B. Criminal Appeal No. 84/2026 Smt. Babli W/o Late Ramcharan, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Kalwadi, P.s. Kherli, District Alwar (Raj.) (At Present Confined In Central Jail Alwar) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mohar Pal Meena, Advocate. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jitendra Singh Rathore, Additional Government Advocate assisted by Ms. Neha Goyal, Advocate. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL Order 02/07/2026 1. This suspension of sentence application has been filed by the accused-applicant along with the appeal. 2. Counsel appearing on behalf of the accused-applicant submits that the accused-applicant has been convicted and sentenced to undergo life imprisonment for the offence punishable under Section 302 IPC. 3. Counsel for the accused-applicant has annexed the certificate under Rule 311 (3) of the Rajasthan High Court Rules [2026:RJ-JP:24570-DB] (2 of 3) [SOSA-363/2026] to the effect that accused-applicant is in judicial custody. Counsel further submits that the accused-applicant has been falsely implicated in this matter. Counsel further submits that the accused-applicant is a lady having two children and she was on bail during trial. Counsel further submits that the appeal is not likely to be heard in near future. Therefore, he prayed that sentence awarded to the accused-applicant may be suspended and they be released on bail during the pendency of the appeal. 4. Learned Additional Advocate General opposed the application for suspension of sentence. 5. We have heard counsel for the parties and perused the record. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the present case, and also considering the fact that the accused-applicant is a lady having two children and also considering the fact that hearing/disposal of appeal may take long time, we deem it just and proper to allow this criminal miscellaneous suspension of sentence application. 7. In that view of the matter, this criminal miscellaneous suspension of sentence application is allowed and it is ordered that execution of sentence awarded to the accused-applicant shall remain suspended during the pendency of the criminal appeal and the accused-applicant be admitted to bail subject to satisfaction of the trial Court with the stipulation that the accused-applicant shall appear before this Court on 04.08.2026 and thereafter as and when called upon to do so. [2026:RJ-JP:24570-DB] (3 of 3) [SOSA-363/2026] 8. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court through e-mail/fax for necessary compliance. (BHUWAN GOYAL),J (INDERJEET SINGH),J 28/TUSHAR/741