Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 946 (PNJ)

UNION OF INDIA v. MOHINDER SINGH AND ANOTHER

CWP/9937/2026 · 2026-04-06

Deepak Manchanda, Harsimran Singh Sethi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (115) CWP-9937-2026 Date of Decision : April 06, 2026 Union of India and others .. Petitioners Versus Mohinder Singh and another .. Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK MANCHANDA Present: Mr. Devanshu Aggarwal, Senior Panel Counsel, for the petitioners. HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI J. (ORAL) 1. In the present writ petition, the prayer of the petitioners is for quashing the order dated 05.12.2025 (Annexure P-5) passed by respondent No.2- Central Administrative Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench, Chandigarh in OA No.412 of 2023 being unconstitutional, illegal, arbitrary and against the categorical policy instructions issued by the Railway Board as well as against the settled law laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India. 2. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he has instructions not to press the present writ petition any further with liberty that in case, any order of the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India where such litigation is pending, reverses the view taken by the Tribunal, the same can be implemented upon the respondents in accordance with law. 3. Ordered accordingly. (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) JUDGE April 06, 2026 (DEEPAK MANCHANDA) harsha JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether reportable : No HARSHA RANI 2026.04.07 16:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document