44-ia-3000-26+.doc Sayali IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 9267 OF 2018 IN INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 3000 OF 2026 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 9267 OF 2018 Bhaskarrao Govindrao Gaikwad (Since Deced) Thr. Lrs and Others … Petitioner/Applicant V/s. The State of Maharashtra and Other … Respondents Mr. S. A. Rajeshirke, for Petitioner- Applicant. Ms. Seema Sarnaik, Senior Advocate with Ms. Sangeeta Salvi, with Ms. Pooja Chattiar, for, for Respondent nos. 3c to 3f. Mr. Hamid Mulla, AGP for State-Respondent Nos. 1 and 2. CORAM : AMIT BORKAR, J. DATED : SEPTEMBER 21, 2026 P.C.: 1. Mr. Rajeshirke, the learned Advocate for the petitioner, on instructions, states that the petitioner is now not interested in pursuing the challenge against the order dated 08 January 2013, with the result that the said order shall be implemented by the authorities under the Act. It is therefore, clarified that the proposed area of 3 Hectors 68 Ares in favour of the respondents 1 SAYALI DEEPAK UPASANI Digitally signed by SAYALI DEEPAK UPASANI Date: 2026.09.21 15:20:23 +0530 44-ia-3000-26+.doc and 1 Hectors 86 Ares in favour of the petitioner as per the order dated 08 January 2013 shall be given effect to by the authorities under the Act. 2. With this clarification, the petition stands disposed of. 3. The Interim Application also does not survive and is disposed of. (AMIT BORKAR, J.) 2