- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB R.F.A. No.1968/2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO.1968/2024 (PAR) BETWEEN: SMT. PRATHIMA D/O SADASHIVA AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS 3-243-2, ANUGRAHA HOUSE KUBALA GUDDE, HALEANGADY MANGALURU - 574146, D.K. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. RODDA VEERSHETTY, ADV., FOR SRI. PATGAR NARENDRA HANUMANT, ADV.,) AND: CHENNAMMA ALIAS PARVATHI (SINCE DEAD) D/O BALE ALIAS PONNAPPA R/AT. BHANDARA HOUSE BEJAI, MANGALORE - 575 004. 1. GIRIJA ALIAS SUGUNA AGED ABOUT 86 YEARS D/O CHENNAMMA ALIAS PARVATHI R/AT. NEAR THIMMAPPA COMPOUND FALNIR, MANGALORE - 575 001. 2. VASANTHI D/O CHENNAMMA ALIAS PARVATHI Digitally signed by RUPA V Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB R.F.A. No.1968/2024 AGED ABOUT 83 YEARS R/AT. BEHIND URVA MARKET MANGALORE - 575 006. 3. SHOBA RAVI AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS D/O VASANTHI R/AT. SAVITHRI NIVAS OLD KENT ROAD PANDESHWARA MANGALORE - 575 001. 4. KAUSHIK AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS S/O SHOBA RAVI D/O VASANTHI R/AT SAVTHRI NIVAS OLD KENT ROAD, PANDESHWARA MANGALORE - 575 001. 5. ABHISHEK AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS S/O VASANTHI R/AT SAVTHRI NIVAS OLD KENT ROAD, PANDESHWARA MANGALORE - 575 001. 6. NALINAKSHI AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS D/O VASANTHI R/AT BEHIND URVA MARKET MANGALORE - 575 006, D.K. 7. SURESH AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS S/O VASANTHI R/AT BEHIND URVA MARKET MANGALORE - 575 006, D.K. 8. SUCHETHA ALIAS SULOCHANA AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB R.F.A. No.1968/2024 D/O VASANTHI R/AT BEHIND URVA MARKET MANGALORE - 575 006, D.K. 9. NAYANA AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS D/O VASANTHI R/AT BEHIND URVA MARKET MANGALORE - 575 006, D.K. 10. MAMATHA AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS D/O VASANTHI R/AT BEHIND URVA MARKET MANGALORE - 575 006, D.K. 11. RAVINDRA S/O CHENNAMMA ALIAS PARVATHI AGED ABOUT 82 YEARS R/AT N.I.G. 21 HOUSING BOARD COLONY KAVOOR, MANGALORE - 575 006, D.K. 12. SHILAMANI D/O LATE CHENNAMMA ALIAS PARVATHI AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS R/AT BHANDARA HOUSE BEJAI, MANGALORE - 575 004 D.K. 13. SOWMYA AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS D/O SHILAMANI R/AT. BHANDARA HOUSE BEJAI, MANGALORE - 575 004, D.K. 14. PRASHANTHA AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS S/O SHILAMANI R/AT BHANDARA HOUSE, BEJAI, MANGALORE - 575 004, D.K. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB R.F.A. No.1968/2024 15. DAYANANDA S/O CHENNAMMA ALIAS PARVATHI AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS R/AT BHANDARA HOUSE BEJAI, MANGALORE - 575 004, D.K. 16. GANGADHARA D/O CHENNAMMA ALIAS PARVATHI AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS R/AT BHANDARA HOUSE BEJAI, MANGALORE - 575 004, D.K. 17. SUNDARI AGED ABOUT 96 YEARS D/O BALE ALIAS PONNAPPA R/AT MAROLI HITLU MANGALORE - 575 004, D.K. 18. HASKER AGED ABOUT 93 YEARS S/O BALE ALIAS PONNAPPA R/AT MAROLI HITLU MANGALORE - 575 004, D.K. 19. DHARMARAJ AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS S/O SUNDARI R/AT MAROLI HITLU MANGALORE - 575 004, D.K. 20. SURESH AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS S/O SUNDARI R/AT MAROLI HITLU MANGALORE - 575 004, D.K. 21. LTHA AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS D/O SUNDARI R/AT MAROLI HITLU MANGALORE - 575 004, D.K. - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB R.F.A. No.1968/2024 22. YASHAVANTHI AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS D/O SUNDARI R/AT ANANDA SUVARNA HOUSE NEAR BHAGINI SAMAJA JEPPU MANGALORE - 575 002. 23. RASMI AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS D/O YASHAVANTHI R/AT ANANDA SUVARNA HOUSE NEAR BHAGINI SAMAJA JEPPU MANGALORE - 575 002. 24. RAKSH AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS D/O YASHAVANTHI R/AT ANANDA SUVARNA HOUSE NEAR BHAGINI SAMAJA JEPPU MANGALORE - 575 002. 25. SHAMBAVI AGED ABOUT 96 YEARS D/O LATE VENKAMMA R/AT KATTADAKODI HOUSE MAROLI, MANGALORE - 575 005. 26. INDIRA AGED ABOUT 93 YEARS D/O LATE VENKAMMA R/AT KATTADAKODI HOUSE MAROLI, MANGALORE - 575 005. SHEKRA (SINCE DEAD) S/O LATE VENKAMMA. MANORAMA (SINCE DEAD) D/O LATE VENKAMMA. 27. SOMANATH AGED ABOUT 93 YEARS - 6 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB R.F.A. No.1968/2024 S/O LATE PUTHAMMA R/AT KANTHAPPA MAISTRY COMPOUND MUNIYAL, KARKALA TALUK UDUPI DIST-574108. 28. THILOTHAMA AGED ABOUT 98 YEARS S/O LATE PUTHAMMA R/AT KANTHAPPA MAISTRY COMPOUND MUNIYAL, KARKALA TALUK UDUPI DIST-574108. 29. INDUMATHI ALIAS KUSUMAVATHY AGED ABOUT 86 YEARS AGED ABOUT 86 YEARS D/O LATE PUTHAMMA R/AT KANTHAPPA MAISTRY COMPOUND MUNIYAL, KARKALA TALUK UDUPI DIST-574108. 30. HARINA AGED ABOUT 79 YEARS D/O LATE SHANTHI R/AT GEETHA MANDIRA GOKARNANATHA TEMPLE ROAD NEAR ALKE BRIDGE KUDROLI, MANGALORE - 575 002. 31. VINUTHA AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS D/O HARINA R/AT GEETHA MANDIR GOKARNANATHA TEMPLE ROAD NEAR ALKE BRIDGE KUDROLI, MANGALORE - 575 002. 32. JYOTHSNA AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS S/O HARINA R/AT GEETHA MANDIR GOKARNANATHA TEMPLE ROAD - 7 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB R.F.A. No.1968/2024 NEAR ALKE BRIDGE KUDROLI, MANGALORE - 575 002. 33. SHWETHA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS D/O HARINA R/AT GEETHA MANDIR GOKARNANATHA TEMPLE ROAD NEAR ALKE BRIDGE KUDROLI, MANGALORE - 575 002. 34. SUGANDHI AGED ABOUT 83 YEARS D/O POOVAMMA R/AT MAROLI PADE KANKANADY MANGALORE - 575 002, D.K. 35. MADHUSUDAN AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS S/O SUGANDHI R/AT MAROLI PADE, KANKANADY MANGALORE - 575 002, D.K. 36. RAJESH AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS S/O SUGANDHI R/AT MAROLI PADE, KANKANADY MANGALORE - 575 002, D.K. 37. CHANDAPPA ALIAS CHANDRAPPA AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS S/O POVAMMA R/AT MAROLI PADE, KANKANADY MANGALORE - 575 002, D.K. 38. NAGESH AMIN AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS S/O POOVAMMA R/AT MAROLI PADE, KANKANADY MANGALORE - 575 002, D.K. - 8 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB R.F.A. No.1968/2024 39. SHAGUNA ALIAS SAGUNA AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS D/O POOVAMMA R/AT XAVIER LUIS COMPOUND KANDETTU, BIKARNAKATTE MANGALORE - 575 005, D.K. 40. UDAYA AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS S/O SHAGUNA ALIAS SAGUNA R/AT XAVIER LUIS COMPOUND KANDETTU, BIKARNAKATTE MANGALORE - 575 005, D.K. 41. VIJAYA AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS S/O SHAGUNA ALIAS SAGUNA R/AT XAVIER LUIS COMPOUND KANDETTU, BIKARNAKATTE MANGALORE - 575 005, D.K. 42. SHAMBAVI AGED ABOUT 77 YEARS D/O SIRIAMMAK R/AT C/O M THIMMAPPA DRIVER K.E.B. B.C.ROAD, BANTWAL - 574219, D.K. 43. DAYAVATHI AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS D/O SHAMBAVI R/AT C/O M. THIMMAPPA DRIVER K.E.B. B.C.ROAD, BANTWAL - 574219, D.K. 44. SUNITHA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS D/O SHAMBAVI R/AT C/O M. THIMMAPPA DRIVER K.E.B. B.C.ROAD, BANTWAL - 574219, D.K. - 9 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB R.F.A. No.1968/2024 45. PRAMILA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS D/O SHAMBAVI R/AT C/O M THIMMAPPA DRIVER K.E.B. B.C.ROAD, BANTWAL - 574219, D.K. 46. PRASHANTHA AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS S/O SHAMBAVI R/AT C/O M THIMMAPPA DRIVER K.E.B. B.C.ROAD, BANTWAL - 574219, D.K. 47. CHANDRAVATHI AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS D/O POOVAMMA R/AT NEAR N.A.V.P. SCHOOL PILIKUNJA, KASARGOD MANGALORE - 575008. 48. PURUSHOTHAMA AMIN AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS D/O SIRIAMMK R/AT YEYYADI, BORBAIL MANGALORE - 575008, D.K. 49. YADAVA AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS S/O SIRIAMMK R/AT MAROLI PADE KANKANADY MANGALORE - 575008. 50. KRISHNAPPA AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS S/O SIRIAMMK R/AT MAROLI PADE KANKANADY MANGALORE - 575008. - 10 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB R.F.A. No.1968/2024 51. RUKMINI AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS D/O SIRIAMMK R/AT. C/O. MONAPPA POOJARY PALLEMAJALU, P.O. MODANAUP B.C. ROAD, BANTWAL TALUK D.K.-574211. 52. RAVI AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS S/O RUKMINI R/AT. C/O. MONAPPA POOJARY PALLEMAJALU, P.O. MODANAUP B.C. ROAD, BANTWAL TALUK D.K.-574211. 53. PREMA AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS D/O SIRIAMMK R/AT MAROLI PADE, KANKANADY MANGALORE - 575 002, D.K. 54. RATHNAKARA AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS S/O PREMA R/AT MAROLI PADE, KANKANADY MANGALORE - 575 002, D.K. 55. CHANDRAHASA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS S/O PREMA R/AT MAROLI PADE, KANKANADY MANGALORE - 575 002, D.K. 56. RAMA BAI AGED ABOUT 85 YEARS D/O YAMUNA R/AT. SHIVA BAGH MERCARA HILL, MAROLI MANGALORE - 575 002, D.K. - 11 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB R.F.A. No.1968/2024 57. PRAFULLA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS D/O RAMA BAI R/AT. BEHIND 'G' RODI KANKANADY MANGALORE - 575 002, D.K. 58. YASHODA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS D/O RAMA BAI R/AT. SHIVA BAGH, MERCARA HILL MAROLI, MANGALORE - 575 002, D.K. 59. KISHANCHANDRA AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS S/O PRAFULLA R/AT. BEHIND 'G' RODI KANKANADY MANGALORE - 575 002, D.K. 60. SWATHI AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS D/O PRAFULLA R/AT. BEHIND 'G' RODI KANKANADY MANGALORE - 575 002, D.K. 61. ANANDA AGED ABOUT 94 YEARS S/O MUNDYAPPA R/AT. SHIVA BAGH, MERCARA HILL MAROLI, MANGALORE, D.K.-575002. 62. MUTHAMMA AGED ABOUT 94 YEARS D/O ACHAPPU R/AT. AITHAPPA SAJIPA VILLAGE BOLLAI POST, BANTWAL TALUK D.K.-574211. - 12 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB R.F.A. No.1968/2024 63. SUNANDA AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS D/O MUTHAMMA R/AT. C/O. VENKAPPA POOJARY MALLAR, PONNEDADI ULAIBETTU POST BANTWAL TALUK, D.K.-574211. 64. PADMAVATHI AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS D/O SUNANDA R/AT. C/O. VENKAPPA POOJARY MALLAR, PONNEDADI ULAIBETTU POST BANTWAL TALUK, D.K.-574211. 65. JANAMMA AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS S/O SUNANDA R/AT. C/O. VENKAPPA POOJARY MALLAR, PONNEDADI ULAIBETTU POST BANTWAL TALUK, D.K.-574211. 66. MOHINI AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS D/O SUNANDA R/AT. C/O. VENKAPPA POOJARY MALLAR, PONNEDADI ULAIBETTU POST BANTWAL TALUK, D.K.-574211. 67. PADMANABHA AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS S/O SUNANDA R/AT. C/O. VENKAPPA POOJARY MALLAR, PONNEDADI ULAIBETTU POST BANTWAL TALUK, D.K.-574211. - 13 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB R.F.A. No.1968/2024 68. HARISCHANDRA AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS S/O SUNANDA R/AT. C/O. VENKAPPA POOJARY MALLAR, PONNEDADI ULAIBETTU POST BANTWAL TALUK, D.K.-574211. 69. ASHOKA AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS S/O SUNANDA R/AT. C/O. VENKAPPA POOJARY MALLAR, PONNEDADI ULAIBETTU POST BANTWAL TALUK, D.K.-574211. 70. KUNHAPPA AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS S/O MUTHAMMA R/AT. C/O. AITHAPPA SAJIPA VILLAGE BOLLAI POST, BANTWAL TALUK D.K. - 574211. 71. PADMAPPA AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS S/O MUTHAMMA R/AT. C/O. AITHAPPA SAJIPA VILLAGE BOLLAI POST, BANTWAL TALUK D.K. - 574211. 72. GIRIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS S/O MUTHAMMA R/AT. C/O. AITHAPPA SAJIPA VILLAGE BOLLAI POST, BANTWAL TALUK D.K. - 574211. 73. KORAGAPPA ALIAS KOGGAPPA AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS S/O MUTHAMMA R/AT. C/O. AITHAPPA SAJIPA VILLAGE - 14 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB R.F.A. No.1968/2024 BOLLAI POST, BANTWAL TALUK D.K. - 574211. 74. SULOCHANA ALIAS SULOCHANI AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS D/O MUTHAMMA R/AT C/O. SRIDHARA POOJARY KEMPU GUDDE, AMTADY VILLAGE POST KINNIBETU, BANTWAL TALUK D.K. - 574211. 75. MAMATHA AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS D/O SULOCHANA ALIAS SULOCHANI R/AT C/O. SRIDHARA POOJARY KEMPU GUDDE, AMTADY VILLAGE POST KINNIBETU, BANTWAL TALUK D.K. - 574211. 76. PRAVINA AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS S/O SULOCHANA ALIAS SULOCHANI R/AT C/O. SRIDHARA POOJARY KEMPU GUDDE, AMTADY VILLAGE POST KINNIBETU, BANTWAL TALUK D.K. - 574211. 77. SAVITHA AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS D/O SULOCHANA ALIAS SULOCHANI R/AT C/O. SRIDHARA POOJARY KEMPU GUDDE, AMTADY VILLAGE POST KINNIBETU, BANTWAL TALUK D.K. - 574211. 78. GANGAYYA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS S/O MUTHAMMA R/AT C/O. SRIDHARA POOJARY KEMPU GUDDE, AMTADY VILLAGE POST KINNIBETU, BANTWAL TALUK D.K. - 574211. - 15 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB R.F.A. No.1968/2024 79. KRISHNAMMA AGED ABOUT 89 YEARS D/O ACHAPPU R/AT C/O. SRIDHARA POOJARY KEMPU GUDDE, AMTADY VILLAGE POST KINNIBETU, BANTWAL TALUK D.K. - 574211. 80. REVATHI AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS D/O KRISHNAMMA R/AT C/O. SRIDHARA POOJARY KEMPU GUDDE, AMTADY VILLAGE POST KINNIBETU, BANTWAL TALUK D.K. - 574211. 81. ROHINI AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS D/O REVATHI R/AT C/O. SRIDHARA POOJARY KEMPU GUDDE, AMTADY VILLAGE POST KINNIBETU, BANTWAL TALUK D.K. - 574211. 82. VASANTHA AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS S/O REVATHI R/AT C/O. SRIDHARA POOJARY KEMPU GUDDE, AMTADY VILLAGE POST KINNIBETU, BANTWAL TALUK D.K. - 574211. 83. JAYALAXMI AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS D/O REVATHI R/AT C/O. SRIDHARA POOJARY KEMPU GUDDE, AMTADY VILLAGE POST KINNIBETU, BANTWAL TALUK D.K. - 574211. - 16 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB R.F.A. No.1968/2024 84. ASHALATHA AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS D/O REVATHI R/AT C/O. SRIDHARA POOJARY KEMPU GUDDE, AMTADY VILLAGE POST KINNIBETU, BANTWAL TALUK D.K. - 574211. 85. NALINI AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS D/O KRISHNAMMA R/AT C/O. RAMA POOJARY, IRAJE VAIL JOUSE, KALIGE VILLAGE BANTWAL TALUK, D.K.-574211. 86. MAHABALA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS S/O NALINI R/AT C/O. RAMA POOJARY, IRAJE VAIL JOUSE, KALIGE VILLAGE BANTWAL TALUK, D.K.-574211. 87. LATHA AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS D/O NALINI R/AT C/O. RAMA POOJARY, IRAJE VAIL JOUSE, KALIGE VILLAGE BANTWAL TALUK, D.K.-574211. 88. GEETHA AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS D/O NALINI R/AT C/O. RAMA POOJARY, IRAJE VAIL JOUSE, KALIGE VILLAGE BANTWAL TALUK, D.K.-574211. 89. NEETHA AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS D/O NALINI - 17 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB R.F.A. No.1968/2024 R/AT C/O. RAMA POOJARY, IRAJE VAIL JOUSE, KALIGE VILLAGE BANTWAL TALUK, D.K.-574211. 90. ASHWITHA AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS D/O NALINI R/AT C/O. RAMA POOJARY, IRAJE VAIL JOUSE, KALIGE VILLAGE BANTWAL TALUK, D.K.-574211. 91. NAMITHA AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS D/O NALINI R/AT C/O. RAMA POOJARY, IRAJE VAIL JOUSE, KALIGE VILLAGE BANTWAL TALUK, D.K.-574211. 92. SUNANDA AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS D/O KRISHNAMMA R/AT C/O. GIRIYAPPA POOJARY KARMAR HOUSE, BALILA VILLAGE BANTWAL TALUK, D.K.-574211. 93. LOLAKSHI AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS D/O SUNANDA R/AT C/O. GIRIYAPPA POOJARY KARMAR HOUSE, BALILA VILLAGE BANTWAL TALUK, D.K.-574211. 94. MOHANDAS AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS S/O SUNANDA R/AT C/O. GIRIYAPPA POOJARY KARMAR HOUSE, BALILA VILLAGE BANTWAL TALUK, D.K.-574211. 95. SUDHAKSHI AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS - 18 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB R.F.A. No.1968/2024 D/O SUNANDA R/AT C/O. GIRIYAPPA POOJARY KARMAR HOUSE, BALILA VILLAGE BANTWAL TALUK, D.K.-574211. 96. MURALIDHARA AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS S/O SUNANDA R/AT C/O. GIRIYAPPA POOJARY KARMAR HOUSE, BALILA VILLAGE BANTWAL TALUK, D.K.-574211. 97. CHIDANANDA AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS S/O SUNANDA R/AT C/O. GIRIYAPPA POOJARY KARMAR HOUSE, BALILA VILLAGE BANTWAL TALUK, D.K.-574211. 98. JARAPPA ALILAS DARAPPA AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS S/O KRISHNAMMA R/AT. C/O. GANAPA POOJARY GANADA KOTYA HOUSE THUMBE VILLAGE BANTWAL TALUK, D.K.-574211. 99. PREMA AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS D/O KRISHNAMMA R/AT. C/O. NARAYANA POOJARY DOOR NO.209, NEAR D.C. BUNGALOW BANTWAL TALUK, D.K.-574211. 100. SHARMILA AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS D/O PREMA R/AT. C/O. NARAYANA POOJARY DOOR NO.209, NEAR D.C. BUNGALOW BANTWAL TALUK, D.K.-574211. - 19 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB R.F.A. No.1968/2024 101. SHRATH AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS S/O PREMA R/AT. C/O. NARAYANA POOJARY DOOR NO.209, NEAR D.C. BUNGALOW BANTWAL TALUK, D.K.-574211. 102. BABY AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS D/O KRISHNAMMA R/AT. DARANDA BAGILU HOUSE HOSAGUDDE, POST THOKKOTTU MANGALORE, D.K.-574211. 103. YATHIN KUMAR AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS S/O BABY R/AT. DARANDA BAGILU HOUSE HOSAGUDDE, POST THOKKOTTU MANGALORE, D.K.-574211. 104. PRAFULL AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS S/O KRISHNAMMA R/AT. C/O. GANAPA POOJARY GANADA KOTYA HOUSE THUMBE VILLAGE BANTWAL TALUK, D.K.-574211. 105. NAGAMMA AGED ABOUT 84 YEARS D/O ACHAPPU R/AT C/O. KANYAPPA POOJARY BALEMANE, CHELURU VILLAGE BANTWAL TALUK, D.K.574211. 106. PADMANBHA AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS S/O NAGAMMA R/AT C/O. KANYAPPA POOJARY BALEMANE, CHELURU VILLAGE - 20 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB R.F.A. No.1968/2024 BANTWAL TALUK, D.K.574211. 107. CHANDRAVATHI AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS D/O NAGAMMA R/AT C/O. KANYAPPA POOJARY BALEMANE, CHELURU VILLAGE BANTWAL TALUK, D.K.574211. 108. SUNDARA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS S/O NAGAMMA R/AT C/O. KANYAPPA POOJARY BALEMANE, CHELURU VILLAGE BANTWAL TALUK, D.K.574211. 109. MONAPPA AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS S/O NAGAMMA R/AT C/O. KANYAPPA POOJARY BALEMANE, CHELURU VILLAGE BANTWAL TALUK, D.K.574211. 110. KOMALA AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS D/O NAGAMMA R/AT C/O. KANYAPPA POOJARY BALEMANE, CHELURU VILLAGE BANTWAL TALUK, D.K.574211. 111. UMESHA AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS S/O NAGAMMA R/AT C/O. KANYAPPA POOJARY BALEMANE, CHELURU VILLAGE BANTWAL TALUK, D.K.574211. 112. JANARDHANA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS S/O NAGAMMA - 21 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB R.F.A. No.1968/2024 R/AT C/O. KANYAPPA POOJARY BALEMANE, CHELURU VILLAGE BANTWAL TALUK, D.K.574211. 113. SHAMBYYA OBAYYA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS S/O NAGAMMA R/AT C/O. KANYAPPA POOJARY BALEMANE, CHELURU VILLAGE BANTWAL TALUK, D.K.574211. 114. HARISHA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS S/O CHANDRAVATHI R/AT C/O. KANYAPPA POOJARY BALEMANE, CHELURU VILLAGE BANTWAL TALUK, D.K.574211. 115. GIRISH AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS S/O CHANDRAVATHI R/AT C/O. KANYAPPA POOJARY BALEMANE, CHELURU VILLAGE BANTWAL TALUK, D.K.574211. 116. SURESHA AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS S/O CHANDRAVATHI R/AT C/O. KANYAPPA POOJARY BALEMANE, CHELURU VILLAGE BANTWAL TALUK, D.K.574211. 117. RATHNA RAJ AGED ABOUT 87 YEARS D/O LATE RUKKU R/AT AMIN NIVAS, VIHAR COLONY MANGALORE, D.K.-575005. 118. VENKATESH AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS S/O RATHANA BAI R/AT AMIN NIVAS, VIHAR COLONY - 22 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB R.F.A. No.1968/2024 MANGALORE, D.K.-575005. 119. JAGANNATHA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS S/O RATHANA BAI R/AT AMIN NIVAS, VIHAR COLONY MANGALORE, D.K.-575005. 120. SUMITHRA AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS S/O RATHANA BAI R/AT NEAR L.F. BRIDGE PUMPWELL, KANKANADY MANGALORE, D.K.-575002. 121. NAINA AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS D/O RATHANA BAI R/AT AMIN NIVAS, VIHAR COLONY MANGALORE, D.K.-575005. 122. BHAVANI AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS D/O RATHANA BAI R/AT AMIN NIVAS, VIHAR COLONY MANGALORE, D.K.-575005. 123. RAKSHITA AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS D/O SUMITHRA R/AT NEAR L.F. BRIDGE PUMPWELL, KANKANADY MANGALORE, D.K.-575002. 124. DHANALAXMI AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS D/O SUMITHRA R/AT NEAR L.F. BRIDGE PUMPWELL, KANKANADY MANGALORE, D.K.-575002. - 23 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB R.F.A. No.1968/2024 125. KOGGAPPA AMIN AGED ABOUT 85 YEARS S/O LATE SEETHAMMA R/AT NEAR L.F. BRIDGE PUMPWELL, KANKANADY MANGALORE, D.K.-575002. 126. SUMATHI ALIAS SULOCHANA AGED ABOUT 82 YEARS D/O LATE SEETHAMMA R/AT NEAR R.B. BUNGLOW KANKANADY, MANGALORE D.K.-575002. 127. ROSHAN PRASAD AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS S/O LATE SEETHAMMA R/AT DWARAKA HOUSE V BLOCK, KRISHNAPUR MANGALORE, D.K.-575014. 128. POORNIMA AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS D/O LATE SEETHAMMA R/AT DWARAKA HOUSE V BLOCK, KRISHNAPUR MANGALORE, D.K.-575014. 129. NISHUMATHI AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS D/O LATE SEETHAMMA R/AT DWARAKA HOUSE V BLOCK, KRISHNAPUR MANGALORE, D.K.-575014. 130. JANARDHANA AGED ABOUT 86 YEARS S/O LATE LAXMI R/AT RAMA NAIK COMPOUND MULIHITHLU, BOLAR - 24 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB R.F.A. No.1968/2024 MANGALORE, D.K-575001. 131. PUSHPAVATHI AGED ABOUT 87 YEARS D/O LEELAVATHI R/AT C/O. K. POOVAPPA D.NO.183 (ROOM NO.9) POLICE QUARTERS MANGALORE, D.K.-575001. 132. BHAGAVANADAS AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS S/O PUSHPAVATHI R/AT C/O. K. POOVAPPA D.NO.183 (ROOM NO.9) POLICE QUARTERS MANGALORE, D.K.-575001. 133. GOPIDAS AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS S/O PUSHPAVATHI R/AT C/O. K. POOVAPPA D.NO.183 (ROOM NO.9) POLICE QUARTERS MANGALORE, D.K.-575001. 134. PRASAD KUMAR AGED ABOUT 84 YEARS S/O LATE LEELAVATHI R/AT BALAGURI, KAVOOR PADAVU, P.O. KAVOOR MANGALORE, D.K.-575006. 135. AJITH KUMAR AGED ABOUT 81 YEARS S/O LATE LEELAVATHI R/AT SENIOR ASSISTANT C/O. C.P.C. COMPANY POST VITTAL, D.K.-574243 - 25 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB R.F.A. No.1968/2024 B. MAHALAXMI (SINCE DEAD) D/O LATE KRISHNAMMA. 136. SATHYENDRA AGED ABOUT 86 YEARS S/O B. MAHALAXMI R/AT PUNJALKATTE POST PUNJALKATTE MANGALORE, D.K - 575004. 137. BHARATHENDRA AGED ABOUT 84 YEARS S/O B. MAHALAXMI R/AT VAS COMPOUND BIKARNKATTE MANGALORE, D.K.-575005. 138. RAVIRAJ AGED ABOUT 83 YEARS S/O B. MAHALAXMI R/AT PUNJALKATTE POST PUNJALKATTE MANGALORE, D.K.- 575004. 139. HARINAKSHI AGED ABOUT 81 YEARS D/O B. MAHALAXMI R/AT C/O. U.L. ANCHAN MANU NEAR GOKUL HALL ASHOKANAGARA MANGALORE, D.K. - 575004. 140. NRIPARAJA AGED ABOUT 79 YEARS S/O B. MAHALAXMI R/AT C/O. U.L. ANCHAN MANU NEAR GOKUL HALL ASHOKANAGARA MANGALORE, D.K. - 575004. - 26 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB R.F.A. No.1968/2024 141. RAJESHWARI AGED ABOUT 77 YEARS S/O B. MAHALAXMI R/AT NEAR DEVIGUDI ASHOKANAGARA MANGALORE, D.K. - 575004. 142. MANOHARI AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS D/O B. MAHALAXMI R/AT NEAR DEVIGUDI ASHOKANAGAR MANGALORE, D.K.- 575004. 143. ROOPAREKHA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS D/O HARINAKSHI R/AT. CLEARK CUM TYPIST CORPORATION BANK PANDESHWAR, MANGALORE, D.K.- 575004. 144. CHITRALEKHA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS D/O HARINAKSHI R/AT C/O. U.L. ANCHAN MANU NEAR GOKUL HALL ASHOKANAGAR MANGALORE, D.K.- 575004. 145. MANOHARA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS S/O HARINAKSHI R/AT C/O. U.L. ANCHAN MANU NEAR GOKUL HALL ASHOKANAGAR MANGALORE, D.K.- 575004. 146. SANTHOSH AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS S/O RAJESHWARI R/AT NEAR DEVIGUDI - 27 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB R.F.A. No.1968/2024 ASHOKANAGAR MANGALORE, D.K.- 575004. 147. BHAGAWAN AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS S/O RAJESHWARI R/AT NEAR DEVIGUDI ASHOKANAGAR MANGALORE, D.K.- 575004. 148. SUCHITRA AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS D/O RAJESHWARI R/AT NEAR DEVIGUDI ASHOKANAGAR MANGALORE, D.K. 575004. RAMACHANDRA (SINCE DEAD) S/O LATE KRISHNAMMA. SUSHEELA (SINCE DEAD) D/O LATE KRISHNAMMA. 149. SHANTHI AGED ABOUT 98 YEARS D/O LATE KRISHNAMMA R/AT. C/O. B. BABU, MAROLI KAIKAMBA, MANGALORE, D.K. 575004. SATISH (SINCE DEAD) S/O LATE KRISHNAMMA. 150. CHANDRAPRABHA AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS D/O LATE KRISHNAMMA R/AT. C/O. VISHWANATHA NEAR BANDIKOTYA MALLARAYA, DEVASTHAN ULLAL, D.K.-575020. - 28 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB R.F.A. No.1968/2024 151. ARUNAKARA AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS S/O LATE KRISHNAMMA R/AT. C/O. B. BABU MAROLI KAIKAMBA, MANGALORE D.K.-575005. 152. SUDHAKARA AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS S/O LATE KRISHNAMMA R/AT. C/O. B. BABU MAROLI KAIKAMBA, MANGALORE D.K.-575005. 153. BHAVANISHAKER AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS S/O LATE KRISHNAMMA R/AT. C/O. B. BABU MAROLI KAIKAMBA, MANGALORE, D.K.-575005. 154. SHOBHAMANI AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS D/O LATE KRISHNAMMA R/AT C/O. B. BABU MAROLI KAIKAMBA, MANGALORE, D.K-575005. 155. YOGITHA AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS D/O CHANDRAPRABHA R/AT C/O. VISHWANATHA NEAR BANDIKOTYA MALLARAYA, DEVASTHAN ULLAL, D.K. 575020. 156. PURUSHOTHAMA AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS S/O CHANDRAPRABHA R/AT C/O. VISHWANATHA NEAR BANDIKOTYA MALLARAYA, DEVASTHAN ULLAL, D.K.-575020. - 29 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB R.F.A. No.1968/2024 157. GIRISHA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS S/O CHANDRAPRABHA R/AT C/O. VISHWANATHA NEAR BANDIKOTYA MALLARAYA, DEVASTHAN ULLAL, D.K.-575020. 158. SOWMYA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS D/O SHANTHI R/AT C/O. B. BABU MAROLI KAIKAMBA, MANGALORE D.K.-575005. 159. ROHINI AGED ABOUT 83 YEARS D/O LATE GNGAMMA R/AT NEAR MAROLLI KAIKAMBA, BIKARNAKATTE POST KULASHEKAR MANGALORE, D.K.-575005. 160. ANITHA AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS D/O ROHINI R/AT NEAR MAROLLI, KAIKAMBA BIKARNAKATTE, POST KULASHEKAR MANGALORE, D.K.- 575004. 161. CHITTARANJAN AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS S/O ROHINI R/AT NEAR MAROLLI, KAIKAMBA BIKARNAKATTE, POST KULASHEKAR MANGALORE, D.K.- 575004. 162. PRABHAVATHI AGED ABOUT 91 YEARS D/O LATE BHAVANI - 30 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB R.F.A. No.1968/2024 R/AT LINGAPPA COMPOUND GANAPATHY TEMPLE ROAD MANGALORE, D.K.-575001. 163. YAMUNA AGED ABOUT 98 YEARS D/O LATE DASAMMA R/AT NEAR MAROLLI, KAIKAMBA BIKARNAKATTE, POST KULASHEKAR MANGALORE, D.K.-575005. 164. PADMANABHA AGED ABOUT 99 YEARS S/O LATE CHENDRAMMA R/AT C/O. SUMATHI ANCHAN DEVIKRIPA NEAR PRABHA BHAVAN SOMESHWAR, UCHIL POST MANGALORE, D.K.-575023. 165. SUNDRI AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS D/O LATE CHENDRAMMA R/AT A SHEENA, ALAPE PADIL, MANGALORE, D.K.575007. 166. SEETHA AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS D/O LATE SHARADA R/AT. KAVOOR POST KAVOOR VILLAGE MANGALORE, D.K.575006. 167. REVATHI AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS D/O LATE SHARADA R/AT C/O. VISHVANTH KANTHAPPA COMPOUND KULASHEKAR, MANGALORE D.K.-575005. - 31 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB R.F.A. No.1968/2024 168. JANAKI AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS D/O LATE SHARADA R/AT C/O. VISHVANTH KANTHAPPA COMPOUND KULASHEKAR, MANGALORE D.K.-575005. 169. SUMATHI AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS D/O LATE SHARADA R/AT C/O. BHUJANGA MARKADE HOUSE, KRISHNANAGAR BONDEL POST, MANGALORE D.K.-575008. 170. MOHINI AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS D/O LATE SHARADA R/AT C/O. BHUJANGA MARKADE HOUSE, KRISHNANAGAR BONDEL POST, MANGALORE D.K.-575008. 171. GANESHA AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS S/O SUNDRI R/AT. C/O. A. SHEENA, ALAPE PADIL, MANGALORE, D.K.-575007. 172. DINESHA AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS S/O SUNDRI R/AT. C/O. A. SHEENA, ALAPE PADIL, MANGALORE, D.K.-575007. 173. JAGADISH AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS S/O SUNDRI R/AT. C/O. A. SHEENA, ALAPE PADIL, MANGALORE, D.K.-575007. - 32 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB R.F.A. No.1968/2024 174. MALATHI AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS D/O SUNDRI R/AT. C/O. A. SHEENA, ALAPE PADIL, MANGALORE D.K.-575007. 175. DAYAVATHI AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS S/O SUNDRI R/AT. C/O. A. SHEENA, ALAPE PADIL, MANGALORE, D.K.-575007. 176. JAYASHREE AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS D/O SEETHA R/AT. NEAR KAVOOR POST KAVOOR VILLAGE MANGALORE, D.K.-575006. 177. SHAILAJA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS D/O SEETHA R/AT. NEAR KAVOOR POST KAVOOR VILLAGE MANGALORE, D.K.-575006. 178. SARITHA AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS D/O SEETHA R/AT. NEAR KAVOOR POST KAVOOR VILLAGE MANGALORE, D.K.-575006. 179. YATHISHA AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS D/O SEETHA R/AT. NEAR KAVOOR POST KAVOOR VILLAGE MANGALORE, D.K.-575006. - 33 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB R.F.A. No.1968/2024 180. DHARESHA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS S/O SUMATHI R/AT. C/O. BHUJANGA MARKADE HOUSE, KRISHNANAGAR BONDEL POST, MANGALORE D.K.-575008. 181. NARESH AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS S/O SUMATHI R/AT. C/O. BHUJANGA MARKADE HOUSE, KRISHNANAGAR BONDEL POST, MANGALORE D.K.-575008. 182. LATHIS AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS S/O SUMATHI R/AT. C/O. BHUJANGA MARKADE HOUSE, KRISHNANAGAR BONDEL POST, MANGALORE D.K.-575008. 183. PRAVEEN AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS S/O JANAKI R/AT. C/O. VISHVANTH KANTHAPPA COMPOUND KULASHEKAR, MANGALORE D.K.-575005. 184. PRAJNA AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS R/AT. C/O. VISHVANTH KANTHAPPA COMPOUND KULASHEKAR, MANGALORE D.K.-575005. - 34 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB R.F.A. No.1968/2024 185. LOHITHA AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS S/O SUMATHI R/AT. C/O. BHUJANGA MARKADE HOUSE, KRISHNANAGAR BONDEL POST, MANGALORE D.K.-575008. NAGAMMA (SINCE DEAD ) D/O LATE KOCHU. 186. ACHUTHA AMIN ALIAS ACHU AGED ABOUT 113 YEARS S/O LATE KOCHU R/AT. C/O. BHUJANGA MARKADE HOUSE, KRISHNANAGAR BONDEL POST, MANGALORE D.K.-575008. 187. SUBRAYA AMIN AGED ABOUT 111 YEARS S/O LATE KOCHU R/AT. C/O. BHUJANGA MARKADE HOUSE, KRISHNANAGAR BONDEL POST, MANGALORE D.K.-575008. 188. GANGA AGED ABOUT 103 YEARS S/O LATE KOCHU R/AT. C/O. BHUJANGA MARKADE HOUSE, KRISHNANAGAR BONDEL POST, MANGALORE D.K.-575008. 189. SUNDARI AGED ABOUT 99 YEARS S/O LATE KOCHU R/AT. C/O. BHUJANGA MARKADE HOUSE, KRISHNANAGAR BONDEL POST, MANGALORE, D.K.-575008. - 35 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB R.F.A. No.1968/2024 190. KRISHNAMMA AGED ABOUT 95 YEARS D/O LATE KOCHU R/AT. C/O. BHUJANGA MARKADE HOUSE, KRISHNANAGAR BONDEL POST, MANGALORE D.K.-575008. 191. PARVATHY AGED ABOUT 95 YEARS D/O LATE NAGAMMA R/AT. C/O. BHUJANGA MARKADE HOUSE, KRISHNANAGAR BONDEL POST, MANGALORE D.K.-575008. SARASWATHY SINCE DEAD. 192. LEELA AGED ABOUT 91 YEARS D/O LATE NAGAMMA R/AT. C/O. BHUJANGA MARKADE HOUSE, KRISHNANAGAR BONDEL POST, MANGALORE D.K.-575008. 193. JAYANTHI AGED ABOUT 82 YEARS D/O LATE NAGAMMA R/AT. C/O. BHUJANGA MARKADE HOUSE, KRISHNANAGAR BONDEL POST, MANGALORE D.K.-575008. 194. TARAVATHY AGED ABOUT 79 YEARS S/O LATE BHAVANI R/AT. MARY HILL, KONCHADY POST MANGALORE, D.K.-575008. - 36 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB R.F.A. No.1968/2024 195. HEMAVATHI AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS D/O GANGA R/AT. KARIYAPPA POOJARY KOTI POOJARY COMPOUND KULASHEKAR, MANGALORE D.K.-575005. 196. KORAGAPPA AMIN AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS S/O GANGA R/AT. KONGOOR HOUSE KULASHEKAR POST MANGALORE, D.K.-575005. 197. KESHAVA AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS S/O GANGA R/AT. C/O. RAMA, KIRODIAN ASHOKANAGAR MANGALORE, D.K.-575006. 198. SURENDRA AMIN AGED ABOUT 79 YEARS S/O SUNDARI R/AT. NEAR GOVT., COCONUT GARDEN KADRI, KANKANADY MANGALORE, D.K.-575002. 199. NAGESH AMIN AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS S/O SUNDARI R/AT. NEAR GOVT COCONUT GARDEN, KADRI, KANKANADY MANGALORE, D.K.575002. 200. ROHITHASHWA AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS S/O SUNDARI R/AT. NEAR GOVT COCONUT - 37 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB R.F.A. No.1968/2024 GARDEN, KADRI, KANKANADY MANGALORE, D.K.575002. 201. RAMADAS AMIN AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS S/O SUNDARI R/AT. NEAR GOVT COCONUT GARDEN, KADRI, KANKANADY MANGALORE, D.K.575002. 202. UMESHA AMIN AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS S/O SUNDARI R/AT. NEAR GOVT COCONUT GARDEN, KADRI, KANKANADY MANGALORE, D.K.575002. 203. LEELADHARA AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS S/O PARVATHY R/AT. NEAR SRI OIL MILLS BOLOOR, MANGALORE D.K.575003. 204. MANOJ AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS S/O PARVATHY R/AT. NEAR SRI OIL MILLS BOLOOR, MANGALORE D.K.575003. 205. YASHAVANTHI AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS S/O PARVATHY R/AT. NEAR SRI OIL MILLS BOLOOR, MANGALORE D.K.575003. 206. NARAYANA AGED ABOUT 79 YEARS S/O LATE SARASWATHY - 38 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB R.F.A. No.1968/2024 R/AT. C/O. CHANDAYYA POOJARY BOLEPUGUDDE HOUSE KAVOOR POST, MANGALORE D.K.-575004. 207. DEVARAJA AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS S/O LATE SARASWATHY R/AT. C/O. CHANDAYYA POOJARY BOLEPUGUDDE HOUSE KAVOOR POST, MANGALORE D.K.-575004. 208. SUSHEELA AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS D/O LATE SARASWATHY R/AT. C/O. CHANDAYYA POOJARY BOLEPUGUDDE HOUSE KAVOOR POST, MANGALORE D.K.-575004. 209. MANOHARA AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS S/O LATE SARASWATHY R/AT. C/O. CHANDAYYA POOJARY BOLEPUGUDDE HOUSE KAVOOR POST, MANGALORE D.K.-575004. 210. VASANTHA AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS D/O LATE SARASWATHY R/AT. C/O. CHANDAYYA POOJARY BOLEPUGUDDE HOUSE KAVOOR POST, MANGALORE D.K.-575004. 211. SARALA AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS D/O LATE SARASWATHY R/AT. SHIVANANDA PANDIT SWAMY - 39 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB R.F.A. No.1968/2024 PRASD HOUSE, THALAPADY KINIGOLI, UDUPI-574150. 212. SURESH AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS S/O LATE SARASWATHY R/AT. C/O. CHANDAYYA POOJARY BOLEPUGUDDE HOUSE KAVOOR POST, MANGALORE D.K.-575004. 213. HARISCHANDRA AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS S/O LATE SARASWATHY R/AT. C/O. CHANDAYYA POOJARY BOLEPUGUDDE HOUSE KAVOOR POST, MANGALORE D.K.-575004. 214. KRISHNAVENI AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS D/O LEELA R/AT. NEAR SRI OIL MILLS BOLOOR, MANGALORE D.K.-575003. 215. YADAVA AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS S/O LEELA R/AT. NEAR SRI OIL MILLS BOLOOR, MANGALORE D.K.-575003. 216. VINODA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS S/O LEELA R/AT. NEAR SRI OIL MILLS BOLOOR, MANGALORE D.K.-575003. - 40 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB R.F.A. No.1968/2024 217. SHIVANANDA AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS S/O LEELA R/AT. NEAR SRI OIL MILLS BOLOOR, MANGALORE D.K.-575003. DEVADAS SINCE DEAD S/O TARAVATHY 218. SUREKHA AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS D/O TARAVATHY R/AT. NEAR V.S.S.S. SANGHA BANTWALA, D.K.-575211. 219. HARISHA AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS S/O TARAVATHY R/AT. MARY HILL KONCHADY POST MANGALORE, D.K.-575008. 220. LATHA AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS S/O TARAVATHY R/AT. MARY HILL KONCHADY POST MANGALORE, D.K.-575008. 221. ASHA AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS D/O TARAVATHY R/AT. MARY HILL KONCHADY POST MANGALORE, D.K.-575008. 222. RENUKA AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS D/O HEMAVATHI R/AT. KARIYAPPA POOJARY - 41 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB R.F.A. No.1968/2024 KOTI POOJARY COMPOUND KULASHEKAR, MANGALORE D.K.-575005. 223. YASHAVANTHA AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS S/O HEMAVATHI R/AT. KARIYAPPA POOJARY KOTI POOJARY COMPOUND KULASHEKAR, MANGALORE D.K.-575005. 224. JAYASHREE AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS D/O HEMAVATHI R/AT. KARIYAPPA POOJARY KOTI POOJARY COMPOUND KULASHEKAR, MANGALORE D.K.-575005. 225. HARISHA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS S/O HEMAVATHI R/AT. KARIYAPPA POOJARY KOTI POOJARY COMPOUND KULASHEKAR, MANGALORE D.K.-575005. 226. UMESHA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS S/O SUSHEELA R/AT. RAMA MAISTRY BOLAPAGUTHU HOUSE DANDEKARI, KONCHADY MANGALORE, D.K.-575008. 227. KAMALAKSHA AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS S/O SUSHEELA R/AT. RAMA MAISTRY BOLAPAGUTHU HOUSE - 42 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB R.F.A. No.1968/2024 DANDEKARI, KONCHADY MANGALORE, D.K.-575008. 228. SADANANDA AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS S/O SUSHEELA R/AT. RAMA MAISTRY BOLAPAGUTHU HOUSE DANDEKARI, KONCHADY MANGALORE, D.K.-575008. 229. SUMAN AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS S/O SUSHEELA R/AT. RAMA MAISTRY BOLAPAGUTHU HOUSE DANDEKARI, KONCHADY MANGALORE, D.K.-575008. 230. MOHAN AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS S/O SUSHEELA R/AT. RAMA MAISTRY BOLAPAGUTHU HOUSE DANDEKARI, KONCHADY MANGALORE, D.K.-575008. 231. LOHITH KUMAR AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS S/O SARALA R/AT. SHIVANANDA PANDI SWAMY PRASD HOUSE, THALAPADY KINIGOLI, UDUPI-574150. 232. SHARATH KUMAR AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS S/O KRISHNAVENI R/AT. NEAR SRI OIL MILLS BOLOOR, MANGALORE D.K.-575003. - 43 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB R.F.A. No.1968/2024 233. NITHIN AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS S/O SUREKHA R/AT. NEAR V.S.S. SANGHA BANTAWAL, D.K.-575211. 234. LOLAMMA AGED ABOUT 99 YEARS D/O POOVAPPA R/AT. DEVIKRIPA PACHANADY VILLAGE BONDEL POST MANGALORE, D.K.-575008. SUNDARI SINCE DEAD D/O LATE POOVAPPA. 235. PUTHAMMA AGED ABOUT 87 YEARS D/O POOVAPPA R/AT. DEVIKRIPA PACHANADY VILLAGE BONDEL POST MANGALORE, D.K.-575008. 236. JAYANTHA AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS S/O LATE POOVAPPA R/AT. SAI NILAYA OPPOSITE BEJAI CHURCH MANGALORE, D.K.-575004. 237. DEVAKE AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS D/O POOVAPPA R/AT. DEVIKRIPA PACHANADY VILLAGE BONDEL POST MANGALORE, D.K.-575008. - 44 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB R.F.A. No.1968/2024 238. LEELA AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS D/O POOVAPPA R/AT. DEVIKRIPA PACHANADY VILLAGE BONDEL POST MANGALORE, D.K.-575008. 239. RAMA AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS D/O POOVAPPA R/AT. DEVIKRIPA PACHANADY VILLAGE BONDEL POST MANGALORE, D.K.-575008. 240. JALAJAKSH AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS D/O PUTHAMMA R/AT. DEVIKRIPA PACHANADY VILLAGE BONDEL POST MANGALORE, D.K.-575008. 241. HARIDASA AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS S/O LATE MUTHU R/AT. DEVIKRIPA PACHANADY VILLAGE BONDEL POST MANGALORE, D.K.-575008. 242. MEENAKSHI AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS D/O LATE MUTHU R/AT. DEVIKRIPA PACHANADY VILLAGE BONDEL POST MANGALORE, D.K.-575008. - 45 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB R.F.A. No.1968/2024 243. PURUSHOTHAMMA AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS D/O LATE MUTHU R/AT. DEVIKRIPA PACHANADY VILLAGE BONDEL POST MANGALORE, D.K.-575008. 244. KEIAHNA VENI AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS D/O LATE MUTHU R/AT. MAROLI DODDAMANE KULASHEKAR POST MANGALORE, D.K.-575005. 245. VIJAYA AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS D/O LATE MUTHU R/AT. DEVIKRIPA PACHANADY VILLAGE BONDEL POST MANGALORE, D.K.-575008. 246. DURGADAS AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS S/O LATE MUTHU R/AT. DEVIKRIPA PACHANADY VILLAGE BONDEL POST MANGALORE, D.K.-575008. 247. SHEKARA AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS S/O PUTHAMMA R/AT. DEVIKRIPA PACHANADY VILLAGE BONDEL POST MANGALORE, D.K.-575008. 248. KESHAVA AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS - 46 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB R.F.A. No.1968/2024 S/O PUTHAMMA R/AT. DEVIKRIPA PACHANADY VILLAGE BONDEL POST MANGALORE, D.K.-575008. 249. JAYANTHI AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS S/O PUTHAMMA R/AT. DEVIKRIPA PACHANADY VILLAGE BONDEL POST MANGALORE, D.K.-575008. 250. PREMNATH AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS S/O DEVAKE R/AT. DEVIKRIPA PACHANADY VILLAGE BONDEL POST MANGALORE, D.K.-575008. 251. RAMESH KUMAR AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS S/O DEVAKE R/AT. DEVIKRIPA PACHANADY VILLAGE BONDEL POST MANGALORE, D.K.-575008. 252. MAHALAXMI AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS D/O DEVAKE R/AT. DEVIKRIPA PACHANADY VILLAGE BONDEL POST MANGALORE, D.K.-575008. 253. TRIVENI AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS D/O DEVAKE - 47 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB R.F.A. No.1968/2024 R/AT. DEVIKRIPA PACHANADY VILLAGE BONDEL POST MANGALORE, D.K.-575008. 254. DIVAKARA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS S/O DEVAKE R/AT. DEVIKRIPA PACHANADY VILLAGE BONDEL POST MANGALORE, D.K.-575008. NALINAKSHI SINCE DEAD D/O DEVAKE. 255. SHEELAKSHI AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS D/O DEVAKE R/AT. DEVIKRIPA PACHANADY VILLAGE BONDEL POST MANGALORE, D.K.-575008. 256. BALAKRISHNA AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS S/O DEVAKE R/AT. DEVIKRIPA PACHANADY VILLAGE BONDEL POST MANGALORE, D.K.-575008. 257. PRASHANTH KUMAR AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS S/O LEELA R/AT. DEVIKRIPA PACHANADY VILLAGE BONDEL POST MANGALORE, D.K.-575008. - 48 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB R.F.A. No.1968/2024 258. CHETAN KUMAR AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS S/O MEENAKSHI R/AT. DEVIKRIPA PACHANADY VILLAGE BONDEL POST MANGALORE, D.K.-575008. 259. MITHUN KUMAR AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS S/O MEENAKSHI R/AT. DEVIKRIPA PACHANADY VILLAGE BONDEL POST MANGALORE, D.K.-575008. 260. PADMASHREE AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS D/O MEENAKSHI R/AT. DEVIKRIPA PACHANADY VILLAGE BONDEL POST MANGALORE, D.K.-575008. 261. SHARATH KUMAR AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS S/O KEIAHNAVENI R/AT. MAROLI DODDAMANE KULASHEKAR POST MANGALORE, D.K.-575005. 262. ANANDA AGED ABOUT 93 YEARS S/O KANAPAYA R/AT. C/O. GEEHA BHAVAN YEYYADI PADAV, MANGALORE D.K.-575008. 263. SANJEEVA AGED ABOUT 95 YEARS S/O MANYAPPE ALIAS MANJAPPE - 49 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB R.F.A. No.1968/2024 R/AT. NEAR JEPPINAMOGARU SCHOOL POST KANKANADY, MANGALORE D.K.-575008. 264. KUMUDA AGED ABOUT 83 YEARS W/O SURENDRA AMIN R/AT. NEAR GOVT., COCONUT GARDEN KADRI, KANKANADY MANGALORE, D.K.-575002 265. AKSHATHA AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS D/O SURENDRA AMIN R/AT. NEAR GOVT., COCOUNT GARDEN KADRI, KANKANADY MANGALORE, D.K.-575002. 266. NEVEDITHA AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS D/O SURENDRA AMIN R/AT. NEAR GOVT., COCOUNT GARDEN KADRI, KANKANADY MANGALORE, D.K.-575002. 267. SHARATH AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS D/O SURENDRA AMIN R/AT. NEAR GOVT., COCOUNT GARDEN KADRI, KANKANADY MANGALORE, D.K.-575002. 268. CHANDRAKSHI AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS W/O ROHITHASHWA R/AT. NEAR GOVT., COCOUNT GARDEN KADRI, KANKANADY MANGALORE, D.K.-575002. 269. PRETHISH AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS - 50 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB R.F.A. No.1968/2024 S/O ROHITHASHWA R/AT. NEAR GOVT., COCOUNT GARDEN KADRI, KANKANADY MANGALORE, D.K.-575002. 270. PRIYA AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS D/O ROHITHASHWA R/AT. NEAR GOVT., COCOUNT GARDEN KADRI, KANKANADY MANGALORE, D.K.-575002. 271. PRITHIKA AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS S/O ROHITHASHWA R/AT. NEAR GOVT., COCOUNT GARDEN KADRI, KANKANADY MANGALORE, D.K.-575002. 272. JAYANTHI BELOOR AGED ABOUT 93 YEARS D/O NAGAMMA R/AT. BOLOOR, MANGALORE D.K.-575003. 273. PARVATHI AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS D/O JAYANTHI R/AT. BOLOOR, MANGALORE D.K.-575003. 274. LEELA AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS D/O JAYANTHI R/AT. BOLOOR, MANGALORE D.K.-575003. 275. GIRIJA AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS W/O KORAGAPPA AMIN R/AT. KONGOOR HOUSE - 51 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB R.F.A. No.1968/2024 KULASHEKAR POST MANGALORE, D.K.-575005. 276. MANJULA AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS D/O GIRIJA R/AT. KONGOOR HOUSE KULASHEKAR POST MANGALORE, D.K.-575005. 277. JAYAPRABHA AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS D/O GIRIJA R/AT. KONGOOR HOUSE KULASHEKAR POST MANGALORE, D.K.-575005. 278. USHA AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS W/O KESHAVA R/AT. KONGOOR HOUSE KULASHEKAR POST MANGALORE, D.K.-575005. 279. SOWMYA AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS D/O KESHAVA R/AT. KONGOOR HOUSE KULASHEKAR POST MANGALORE, D.K.-575005. 280. SAPNA AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS D/O KESHAVA R/AT. KONGOOR HOUSE KULASHEKAR POST MANGALORE, D.K.-575005. 281. GAYATHRI AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS W/O DEVADAS - 52 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB R.F.A. No.1968/2024 R/AT. KANOOR, MANGALORE D.K.-575005. 282. LAXMI AGED ABOUT 99 YEARS W/O SUNDARA R/AT. MAROLI, DODDAMANE KULASHEKAR POST, MANGALORE D.K.-575005. 283. NAGESH ANCHAN AGED ABOUT 83 YEARS S/O SUNDARA R/AT. MAROLI, DODDAMANE KULASHEKAR POST MANGALORE, D.K.-575005. 284. LALITHA AGED ABOUT 81 YEARS D/O SUNDARA R/AT. MAROLI, DODDAMANE KULASHEKAR POST MANGALORE, D.K.-575005. 285. LAXMANA AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS S/O SUNDARA R/AT. MAROLI, DODDAMANE KULASHEKAR POST MANGALORE, D.K.-575005. 286. ANANDA AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS S/O SUNDARA R/AT. MAROLI, DODDAMANE KULASHEKAR POST MANGALORE, D.K.-575005. 287. CHANDRASHEKAR AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS S/O SUNDARA - 53 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB R.F.A. No.1968/2024 R/AT. MAROLI, DODDAMANE KULASHEKAR POST MANGALORE, D.K.-575005. 288. NAVEENCHANDRA AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS S/O SUNDARA R/AT. MAROLI, DODDAMANE KULASHEKAR POST MANGALORE, D.K.-575005. 289. T. GIRIJA AGED ABOUT 88 YEARS W/O LATE SHEKARA R/AT. KATTADAKODI HOUSE MAROLI, MANGALORE D.K.-575005. 290. SANTHOSH AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS S/O LATE SHEKARA R/AT. KATTADAKODI HOUSE MAROLI, MANGALORE D.K.-575005. 291. M. SHIVAPRASAD AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS S/O LATE SHEKARA R/AT. KATTADAKODI HOUSE MAROLI, MANGALORE D.K.-575005. 292. M. PUSHPA RAJ AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS S/O LATE SHEKARA R/AT. KATTADAKODI HOUSE MAROLI, MANGALORE D.K.-575005. 293. SHARNYA AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS - 54 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB R.F.A. No.1968/2024 D/O LATE SHEKARA R/AT. KATTADAKODI HOUSE MAROLI, MANGALORE D.K.-575005. 294. YAMUNA AGED ABOUT 111 YEARS W/O ACHUTHA AMIN ALIAS ACHU R/AT. JAYASHREE GATE BIKARNKATTA, MANGALORE D.K.-575005. 295. PREMALATHA AGED ABOUT 93 YEARS D/O ACHUTHA AMIN ALIAS ACHU R/AT. JAYASHREE GATE BIKARNKATTA, MANGALORE D.K.-575005. 296. VEDAVATHI AGED ABOUT 91 YEARS D/O ACHUTHA AMIN ALIAS ACHU R/AT. JAYASHREE GATE BIKARNKATTA, MANGALORE D.K.-575005. 297. UMANATH AGED ABOUT 90 YEARS S/O ACHUTHA AMIN ALIAS ACHU R/AT. JAYASHREE GATE BIKARNKATTA, MANGALORE D.K.-575005. 298. CHANDRAKSHI AGED ABOUT 88 YEARS S/O ACHUTHA AMIN ALIAS ACHU R/AT. JAYASHREE GATE BIKARNKATTA, MANGALORE D.K.-575005. - 55 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB R.F.A. No.1968/2024 299. JAYAVEERA AGED ABOUT 86 YEARS S/O ACHUTHA AMIN ALIAS ACHU R/AT. JAYASHREE GATE BIKARNKATTA, MANGALORE D.K.-575005. 300. SATHISHA AGED ABOUT 84 YEARS D/O ACHUTHA AMIN ALIAS ACHU R/AT. JAYASHREE GATE BIKARNKATTA, MANGALORE D.K.-575005. 301. SHAMALA AGED ABOUT 82 YEARS D/O ACHUTHA AMIN ALIAS ACHU R/AT. JAYASHREE GATE BIKARNKATTA, MANGALORE D.K.-575005. 302. NARENDRA AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS D/O ACHUTHA AMIN ALIAS ACHU R/AT. JAYASHREE GATE BIKARNKATTA, MANGALORE D.K.-575005. 303. POORNIMA AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS D/O ACHUTHA AMIN ALIAS ACHU R/AT. JAYASHREE GATE BIKARNKATTA, MANGALORE D.K.-575005. 304. DINESHA AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS S/O ACHUTHA AMIN ALIAS ACHU R/AT. JAYASHREE GATE BIKARNKATTA, MANGALORE D.K.-575005. - 56 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB R.F.A. No.1968/2024 305. VISHALAKSHI AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS D/O ACHUTHA AMIN ALIAS ACHU R/AT. JAYASHREE GATE BIKARNKATTA, MANGALORE D.K.-575005. 306. CHANDRAKANTHA AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS S/O LATE SARASWATHI R/AT. BALEPU GUDDE MANGALORE, D.K.-575015. 307. NARAYANA AGED ABOUT 84 YEARS S/O LATE SARASWATHI R/AT. BALEPU GUDDE MANGALORE, D.K.-575015. 308. DEVARAJ AGED ABOUT 79 YEARS S/O LATE SARASWATHI R/AT. BALEPU GUDDE MANGALORE, D.K.-575015. 309. SUSHEELA AGED ABOUT 77 YEARS D/O LATE SARASWATHI R/AT. BALEPU GUDDE MANGALORE, D.K.-575015. 310. MANOHR AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS S/O LATE SARASWATHI R/AT. BALEPU GUDDE MANGALORE, D.K.-575015. 311. VASANTHA AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS D/O LATE SARASWATHI - 57 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB R.F.A. No.1968/2024 R/AT. BALEPU GUDDE MANGALORE, D.K.-575015. 312. SARALA AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS D/O LATE SARASWATHI R/AT. BALEPU GUDDE MANGALORE, D.K.-575015. 313. SURESHA AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS S/O LATE SARASWATHI R/AT. BALEPU GUDDE MANGALORE, D.K.-575015. 314. HARISCHANDRA AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS S/O LATE SARASWATHI R/AT. BALEPU GUDDE MANGALORE, D.K.-575015. 315. SACHINDRA AGED ABOUT 96 YEARS S/O MAHALAXMI R/AT. PUNJALKATTE POST MANGALORE, D.K.-574233. 316. BARATENDRA AGED ABOUT 94 YEARS S/O MAHALAXMI R/AT. PUNJALKATTE POST MANGALORE, D.K.-574233. 317. RAVIRAJ AGED ABOUT 93 YEARS S/O MAHALAXMI R/AT. PUNJALKATTE POST MANGALORE, D.K.-574233. 318. HARINAKSHI AGED ABOUT 91 YEARS - 58 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB R.F.A. No.1968/2024 S/O MAHALAXMI R/AT. PUNJALKATTE POST MANGALORE, D.K.-574233. 319. NRAPARAJ AGED ABOUT 89 YEARS S/O MAHALAXMI R/AT. PUNJALKATTE POST MANGALORE, D.K.-574233. 320. RAJESHWARI AGED ABOUT 92 YEARS D/O MAHALAXMI R/AT. PUNJALKATTE POST MANGALORE, D.K.-574233. 321. MANOHARI AGED ABOUT 86 YEARS D/O MAHALAXMI R/AT. PUNJALKATTE POST MANGALORE, D.K.-574233. 322. VASUKUMARI AGED ABOUT 84 YEARS D/O MAHALAXMI R/AT. PUNJALKATTE POST MANGALORE, D.K.-574233. 323. JAIRAJ AGED ABOUT 81 YEARS S/O SUSHEELA R/AT. KAIKAMBA KULASHEKAR POST MANGALORE, D.K.-575005. 324. JEEVARATHANA AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS S/O SUSHEELA R/AT. KAIKAMBA KULASHEKAR POST MANGALORE, D.K.-575005. - 59 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB R.F.A. No.1968/2024 325. SUNDARI BAI AGED ABOUT 108 YEARS W/O LATE RAMACHANDRA R/AT. SAVITHRI NILAYA OLD KEN ROAD MANGALORE, D.K.-575001. 326. SHASHIKANTH AGED ABOUT 105 YEARS S/O LATE SAVITHRI R/AT. SAVITHRI NILAYA OLD KEN ROAD MANGALORE, D.K.-575001. 327. CHANDRAKALA AGED ABOUT 84 YEARS W/O LATE RAMACHANDRA R/AT. SAVITHRI NILAYA OLD KEN ROAD MANGALORE, D.K.-575001. 328. NAVEEN AGED ABOUT 81 YEARS S/O LATE RAMACHANDRA R/AT. SAVITHRI NILAYA OLD KEN ROAD MANGALORE, D.K.-575001. 329. PRADEEP AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS S/O LATE RAMACHANDRA R/AT. SAVITHRI NILAYA OLD KEN ROAD MANGALORE, D.K.-575001. 330. ROHINI AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS W/O LATE SATISH R/AT. MAROLIKAIKAMBA KULASHEKAR POST MANGALORE, D.K.-575005. - 60 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB R.F.A. No.1968/2024 331. PRAJVITHA AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS S/O LATE SATISH R/AT. MAROLIKAIKAMBA KULASHEKAR POST MANGALORE, D.K.-575005. 332. AKSHTHA AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS D/O LATE SATISH R/AT. MAROLIKAIKAMBA KULASHEKAR POST MANGALORE, D.K.-575005. 333. BHUJANGA AGED ABOUT 101 YEARS S/O LATE CHENNAMMA ALIAS PARVATHI R/AT. BHANDARA MANE, BEJAI MANGALORE, D.K.-575004. 334. GIRIJA AGED ABOUT 96 YEARS D/O LATE CHENNAMMA ALIAS PARVATHI R/AT. BHANDARA MANE, BEJAI MANGALORE, D.K.-575004. 335. K. PADMANABHA AMIN AGED ABOUT 93 YEARS S/O LATE CHENNAMMA ALIAS PARVATHI R/AT. BHANDARA MANE, BEJAI MANGALORE, D.K.-575004. 336. VASANTHI AGED ABOUT 92 YEARS D/O LATE CHENNAMMA ALIAS PARVATHI - 61 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB R.F.A. No.1968/2024 R/AT. BHANDARA MANE, BEJAI MANGALORE, D.K.-575004. 337. AMRUTHA AGED ABOUT 85 YEARS D/O LATE CHENNAMMA ALIAS PARVATHI R/AT. BHANDARA MANE, BEJAI MANGALORE, D.K.-575004. 338. ASHOKA AGED ABOUT 77 YEARS S/O LATE CHENNAMMA ALIAS PARVATHI R/AT. BHANDARA MANE, BEJAI MANGALORE, D.K.-575004. 339. SUCHARITHA AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS D/O LATE MANORAMA R/AT MAROLI DODDAMANE, KULASHEKAR POST MANGALORE 575005. 340. ROSHAN AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS S/O LATE MANORAMA R/AT MAROLI DODDAMANE, KULASHEKAR POST MANGALORE 575005. 341. THARESH AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS S/O LATE MANORAMA R/AT MAROLI DODDAMANE, KULASHEKAR POST MANGALORE 575005. 342. VISHALA AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS D/O LATE MANORAMA R/AT MAROLI - 62 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB R.F.A. No.1968/2024 DODDAMANE, KULASHEKAR POST MANGALORE 575005. 343. SHEKARA AGED ABOUT 92 YEARS S/O LATE CHENNAMMA ALIAS PARVATHI R/AT. MONAPPA COMPOUND MARNAMIKATTE MANGALORE, D.K.-575004. 344. BHJANGA ALIAS SUNDARA AGED ABOUT 90 YEARS S/O LATE CHENNAMMA ALIAS PARVATHI R/AT MUNDA COLONY BLOCK NO 10, ROOM NO 6 POWY SQUARE, BOMBAY 400082. 345. RAMACHANDRA AGED ABOUT 88 YEARS S/O LATE CHENNAMMA ALIAS PARVATHI R/AT NO 355, 10TH CROSS III STAGE, GOKULAM MYSORE 570002. 346. PURUSHOTHAMA AGED ABOUT 88 YEARS S/O LATE CHENNAMMA ALIAS PARVATHI R/AT SUPERVISOR, SOETS LTD., THANE, MAHARASHTRA-400066. 347. GOPALAKRISHNA AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS S/O LATE CHENNAMMA ALIAS PARVATHI R/AT MANAGER VIJAYA BANK NAGAPPA BLOCK BANGALORE 560021. - 63 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB R.F.A. No.1968/2024 348. AMRITH KUMAR AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS S/O LATE CHENNAMMA ALIAS PARVATHI R/AT C/O GOVT., TOOL ROOM AND TRAINING CENTRE RAJAJI NAGAR INDUSTRIAL ESTATE BANGALORE-560044. 349. ASHOK KUMAR AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS S/O LATE CHENNAMMA ALIAS PARVATHI R/AT 15A, GANESH LEELA NEAR BHARGAVI TEMPLE KELWA WEST, BOMBAY 400088. 350. YASHODA AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS D/O LATE SEETHAMMA R/AT PRASHANTH KUTEERA BHARATHINAGAR DHARWAD 580004. 351. SOMASUNDARA AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS D/O LATE SEETHAMMA R/AT. PRASHANTH KUTEERA BHARATHINAGAR DHARWAD 580004. 352. PRASHANTH AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS D/O YASHODA R/AT PRASHANTH KUTEERA BHARATHINAGAR DHARWAD 580004. 353. PAVITHRA AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS D/O YASHODA - 64 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB R.F.A. No.1968/2024 R/AT PRASHANTH KUTEERA BHARATHINAGAR DHARWAD 580004. 354. THRIVENI AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS D/O YASHODA R/AT PRASHANTH KUTEERA BHARATHINAGAR DHARWAD 580004. 355. VASANTHA AMIN AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS S/O INDIRA R/AT C9-2, NITHIN BUILDING GEETHANJALI NAGAR S.V. ROAD, BORIVILE WEST BOMBAY 400071. 356. SUCHARITHA AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS D/O MANORAMA R/AT J-543, 6TH FLOOR RESERVE BANK OF INDIA QUARTERS BYCULLA, BOMBAY 400071. 357. ABHIJITH AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS S/O SUCHARITHA R/AT J-543, 6TH FLOOR RESERVE BANK OF INDIA QUARTERS BYCULLA, BOMBAY 400071. 358. NIHAL AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS S/O SUCHARITHA R/AT J-543, 6TH FLOOR RESERVE BANK OF INDIA QUARTERS BYCULLA, BOMBAY 400071. - 65 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB R.F.A. No.1968/2024 359. TARESH AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS S/O MANORAMA R/AT J-543, 6TH FLOOR RESERVE BANK OF INDIA QUARTERS BYCULLA, BOMBAY 400071. 360. ROHAN AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS S/O MANORAMA R/AT J-543, 6TH FLOOR RESERVE BANK OF INDIA QUARTERS BYCULLA, BOMBAY 400071. 361. VISHALA AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS S/O MANORAMA R/AT J-543, 6TH FLOOR RESERVE BANK OF INDIA QUARTERS BYCULLA, BOMBAY 400071. 362. NONIP AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS S/O VISHALA R/AT J-543, 6TH FLOOR RESERVE BANK OF INDIA QUARTERS BYCULLA, BOMBAY 400071. 363. DIVAKARA AGED ABOUT 87 YEARS S/O LATE VENKAMMA R/AT. #11, B.A.R.C. QUARTERS BYCULLA, BOMBAY-400008. 364. JANARDHAN AGED ABOUT 98 YEARS D/O LATE PUTHAMMA R/AT 7-2-2, TATA HOUSING CENTRE, LULLUBHAI PARK ROAD ANDERI WEST, BOMBAY 400058. - 66 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB R.F.A. No.1968/2024 365. ROHINI ALIAS MOHINI AGED ABOUT 90 YEARS D/O LATE PUTHAMMA R/AT G-2, TATA HOUSING CENTRE, LULLUBHAI PARK ROAD ANDERI WEST, BOMBAY 400058. 366. PRATAP AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS S/O ROHINI ALIAS MOHINI R/AT G-2, TATA HOUSING CENTRE, LULLUBHAI PARK ROAD ANDERI WEST, BOMBAY 400058. 367. PRASHANTH ALIAS PRAKASH AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS S/O ROHINI ALIAS MOHINI R/AT G-2, TATA HOUSING CENTRE, LULLUBHAI PARK ROAD ANDERI WEST, BOMBAY 400058. 368. MALLIKA AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS S/O ROHINI ALIAS MOHINI R/AT G-2, TATA HOUSING CENTRE, LULLUBHAI PARK ROAD ANDERI WEST, BOMBAY 400058. 369. CHANDRAKANTHA AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS S/O ROHINI ALIAS MOHINI R/AT G-2, TATA HOUSING CENTRE, LULLUBHAI PARK ROAD ANDERI WEST, BOMBAY 400058. 370. HEMALATHA KOTIAN AGED ABOUT 85 YEARS D/O LATE SHANTHI R/AT 14-473, SUTASH NAGAR CHEMBER, BOMBAY 400071. - 67 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB R.F.A. No.1968/2024 371. VEDAVATHI AGED ABOUT 83 YEARS D/O LATE SHANTHI R/AT ROOM NO.158, JORHABAGA, ASSLFA PIPE LINE, GHATKOPPER BOMBAY 400084. 372. VIDYULLATHA AGED ABOUT 81 YEARS D/O LATE SHANTHI R/AT. PRAMILA, PATEL CHAL SQUATRS COLONY ROAD, MEGHWADI JOGEHSWARI EAST, BOMBAY 400060. 373. DEVARAJ AMIN AGED ABOUT 77 YEARS S/O LATE SHANTHI R/AT ROOM NO.2, AMARCHAND CO-OP HOUSING SOCIETY OPP. MAHALAXMI COLONY CEASERS ROAD, AMBOLI VILLAGE ANDERI WEST, BOMBAY-400058. 374. PARAMESHA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS S/O HEMALATHA KOTIAN R/AT 14-473, SUTHASH NAGAR CHEMBER, BOMBAY 400071. 375. NANDISH AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS S/O HEMALATHA KOTIAN R/AT 14-473, SUTHASH NAGAR CHEMBER, BOMBAY 400071. 376. JESHWANTHI ALIAS YASHAVANTHI AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS S/O HEMALATHA KOTIAN R/AT 14-473, SUTHASH NAGAR CHEMBER, BOMBAY 400071. - 68 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB R.F.A. No.1968/2024 377. KUNAL AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS S/O HEMALATHA KOTIAN R/AT 14-473, SUTHASH NAGAR CHEMBER, BOMBAY 400071. 378. MAHESH AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS S/O VEDAVATHI R/AT ROOM NO.158, JORHABAGH ASSLFA, PIPE LINE, GHATKOPPER BOMBAY-400084. 379. SHAILAJA AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS D/O VEDAVATHI R/AT ROOM NO.158, JORHABAGH ASSLFA, PIPE LINE, GHATKOPPER BOMBAY-400084. 380. NIRANJAN AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS S/O VEDAVATHI R/AT ROOM NO.158, JORHABAGH ASSLFA, PIPE LINE, GHATKOPPER BOMBAY-400084. 381. CHANDANI AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS D/O VIDYULLATHA R/AT. PRAMILA, PATEL CHAL SQUATRS, COLONY ROAD MEGHWADI, JOGESHWARI EAST BOMBAY-400060. 382. LAVANYA AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS D/O VIDYULLATHA R/AT. PRAMILA, PATEL CHAL SQUATRS, COLONY ROAD - 69 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB R.F.A. No.1968/2024 MEGHWADI, JOGESHWARI EAST BOMBAY-400060. 383. BHARATH AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS D/O VIDYULLATHA R/AT. PRAMILA, PATEL CHAL SQUATRS, COLONY ROAD MEGHWADI, JOGESHWARI EAST BOMBAY-400060. 384. YOGENDRA AGED ABOUT 83 YEARS S/O YAMUNA R/AT NO.585, 'A' TYPE K.G.F. KOLAR-563113. 385. SHIVAPPA AGED ABOUT 93 YEARS S/O LATE JANAMMA OCC:CARPENTER R/AT. DOOR NO.137-2 MALANDEVAPET, COORG MADIKERI-400060. 386. SHODANPRASAD AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS S/O SUMATHI R/AT C/O. GARDIAN, ROYAL EXCHANGE INSURANCE P.B.NO.5899, RUVI MUSCANT-SULTANATE OF OMAN. 387. VENKAPPA AGED ABOUT 100 YEARS S/O LATE LAXMI R/AT. BORICHAL HOUSE BAIWADI VOKALA CHURCH (SOUTH) BOMBAY-400060. 388. SOWMINI AGED ABOUT 79 YEARS - 70 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB R.F.A. No.1968/2024 D/O LATE LEELAVATHI R/AT. DOOR NO.175 OPP. VAKKALIGA HOSTEL B.M. ROAD, HASSAN-573201. 389. GUNAVATHI AGED ABOUT 77 YEARS D/O LATE LEELAVATHI R/AT. DOOR NO.175 OPP. VAKKALIGA HOSTEL B.M. ROAD, HASSAN-573201. 390. ASHA AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS D/O SOWMINI R/AT. DOOR NO.175 OPP. VAKKALIGA HOSTEL B.M. ROAD, HASSAN-573201. 391. PRAVEN RAJ AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS S/O SOWMINI R/AT. DOOR NO.175 OPP. VAKKALIGA HOSTEL B.M. ROAD, HASSAN-573201. 392. VARADARAJ AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS S/O SOWMINI R/AT. DOOR NO.175 OPP. VAKKALIGA HOSTEL B.M. ROAD, HASSAN-573201. 393. VASUKUMARI AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS D/O MAHALAXMI R/AT. C/O. BHASKAR SANIL DOOR NO.55(2), NEW HOUSE NMC 5TH CROSS, OLD TOWN LEFT BADRAVATHI-577303. - 71 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB R.F.A. No.1968/2024 394. RENUKA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS D/O VASUKUMARI R/AT. C/O. BHASKAR SANIL DOOR NO.55(2), NEW HOUSE NMC 5TH CROSS, OLD TOWN LEFT BADRAVATHI-577303. 395. G.V. JAIRAJ AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS S/O SUSHEELA R/AT. C/O. MAJOR, J.G. BALA T-179-1, SHAHIBAG OFFICERS ENCLAVE NEAR SHAHIBAG TALL NAKA AHMEDBAD-380008. 396. JEEVARATHAN AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS S/O SUSHEELA R/AT. C/O. SYNDICATE BANK, JAL PALACE T-179-1, SHAHIBAG OFFICERS ENCLAVE NEAR SHAHIBAG TALL NAKA AHMEDBAD-380008. 397. SAROJINI AGED ABOUT 96 YEARS D/O LATE RAMANI R/AT. SHANTHI BUILDING FLAT NO.15, CHEDDA NAGAR CHEMBUR, BOMBAY-400089. 398. SUMATHI AGED ABOUT 93 YEARS D/O LATE RAMANI R/AT. ASHWINI NIVAS, 1ST FLOOR BLOCK NO.3, M-PHULA ROAD DOMBIWILL WEST, THANE-421202. 399. SABITHA AGED ABOUT 81 YEARS D/O LATE RAMANI - 72 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB R.F.A. No.1968/2024 R/AT. C/O. JAYANTHA & CO-6 DHANALAXMI REFLE RANGES GHATKOPER, BOMBAY-400086. 400. HARINAKSHI AGED ABOUT 79 YEARS D/O LATE RAMANI R/AT 8/225, SHASHTRI NAGAR GOREGON WEST, BOMBAY-400062. 401. JAYANTHA AGED ABOUT 77 YEARS D/O LATE RAMANI R/AT. ARUNODAYA, FLAT NO.5 ODHAR NAGAR, BORIVILI (EAST) BOMBAY-400066. 402. RAVIKALA AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS D/O LATE RAMANI R/AT FLAT NO.5, 2ND FLOOR DARSHAN PARLE (C), KALYANINAGAR YARWADA, POONA-411014. 403. MOHAN AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS S/O LATE RAMANI R/AT SHANTHI BUILDING FLAT NO.15, CHEDDA NAGAR CHEMBUR, BOMBAY-400089. 404. SATHISH AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS S/O LATE RAMANI R/AT SHANTHI BUILDING FLAT NO.15, CHEDDA NAGAR CHEMBUR, BOMBAY-400089. 405. ARAVINDA AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS S/O LATE RAMANI - 73 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB R.F.A. No.1968/2024 R/AT SHANTHI BUILDING FLAT NO.15, CHEDDA NAGAR CHEMBUR, BOMBAY-400089. 406. ANUSHA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS D/O SHOBITHA R/AT C/O. JAYANTHA & CO-6 DHANALAXMI REFLE RANGES GHATKOPER, BOMBAY-400086. 407. BABY AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS D/O ANUSHA R/AT C/O. JAYANTHA & CO-6 DHANALAXMI REFLE RANGES GHATKOPER, BOMBAY-400086. 408. SUSHMA AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS D/O SHOBITHA R/AT C/O. JAYANTHA & CO-6 DHANALAXMI REFLE RANGES GHATKOPER, BOMBAY-400086. 409. KEERTHI AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS D/O SHOBITHA R/AT C/O. JAYANTHA & CO-6 DHANALAXMI REFLE RANGES GHATKOPER, BOMBAY-400086. 410. LAVANYA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS D/O SUMATHI R/AT. ASHWINI NIVAS, 1ST FLOOR BLOCK NO.3, M-PHULA ROAD DOMBIWILL-WEST, THANE-421202. 411. MARIDULA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS - 74 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB R.F.A. No.1968/2024 S/O SUMATHI R/AT 1/9TH , JUHU, VISAL J.V.P.D., SCHEME, 5TH FLOOR JUHU, BOMBAY-400049. 412. ANIL AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS S/O MARIDULA R/AT. ASHWINI NIVAS, 1ST FLOOR BLOCK NO.3, M-PHULA ROAD DOMBIWILL-WEST, THANE-421202. 413. SUNIL AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS S/O MARIDULA R/AT. ASHWINI NIVAS, 1ST FLOOR BLOCK NO.3, M-PHULA ROAD DOMBIWILL-WEST, THANE-421202. 414. PUNITH AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS S/O LAVANYA R/AT. ASHWINI NIVAS, 1ST FLOOR BLOCK NO.3, M-PHULA ROAD DOMBIWILL-WEST, THANE-421202. 415. PRIYA AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS S/O LAVANYA R/AT. ASHWINI NIVAS, 1ST FLOOR BLOCK NO.3, M-PHULA ROAD DOMBIWILL-WEST, THANE-421202. 416. PRABHAKARA AGED ABOUT 88 YEARS S/O LATE RAMANI R/AT A-20, ROOPE-POOJA CO-OP HOUSING SOCIETY, 5TH FLOOR BEHIND ST. MARY'S HIGH SCHOOL NAHUR, MULAND, BOMBAY-400080. - 75 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB R.F.A. No.1968/2024 417. NEVADITA AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS D/O HARINAKSHI R/AT 8/255, SHASHTRI NAGAR GOREGON WEST BOMBAY-400062. 418. ARCHANA AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS D/O HARINAKSHI R/AT 8/255, SHASHTRI NAGAR GOREGON WEST BOMBAY-400062. 419. THARUN AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS S/O RAVIKALA R/AT. FLAT NO.5, II FLLOR DARSHAN PARLE (C) KALYANINAGAR, YARWADA POONA-411014. 420. NIHIL AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS S/O RAVIKALA R/AT FLAT NO.5, II FLOOR DARSHAN PARLE (C), KALYANINAGAR YARWADA, POONA-411014. 421. NAGESH AGED ABOUT 89 YEARS S/O GANGAMMA R/AT. 106/8, DEFENCE CIVIL QUARTERS KELINA, VIDYANAGAR BOMBAY-400098. 422. VASANTHA AGED ABOUT 81 YEARS S/O GANGAMMA R/AT 142/4250, KANNAMVARANAGAR VIKROLI, BOMBAY-400083. - 76 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB R.F.A. No.1968/2024 423. GEETHA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS D/O ROHINI R/AT NO.504, VRINDAVAN 2A QUARRY ROAD, RAHIJA TOWNSHIP MALAD (EAST), BOMBAY-400097. 424. RAJITHA AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS D/O ROHINI R/AT. C/O. AGRICULTURAL FINANCE CORPORATION LTD., DHANRAJ MAHAL CHATRAPATHI SHIVAJI MAHARAJ MARG, BOMBAY-400039. 425. NAMITHA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS D/O ROHINI R/AT #16 NAND SUKHSHANTHI M-FULE ROAD, BOMBIVIL (WEST) THANA-421202. 426. POORNIMA AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS D/O ROHINI R/AT. C/O. AGRICULTURAL FINANCE CORPORATION LTD., DHANRAJ MAHAL CHATRAPATHI SHIVAJI MAHARAJ MARG, BOMBAY-400039. 427. YATHIS AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS D/O ROHINI R/AT NO.504, VRINDAVAN 2A QUARRY ROAD RAHIJA TOWNSHIP MALAD (EAST), BOMBAY-400097. 428. NATHASHA AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS D/O RAJITHA - 77 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB R.F.A. No.1968/2024 R/AT. C/O. AGRICULTURAL FINANCE CORPORATION LTD., DHANRAJ MAHAL CHATRAPATHI SHIVAJI MAHARAJ MARG, BOMBAY-400039. 429. AKSHAYA AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS S/O NAMITHA R/AT #16, NAND SUKHSHANTHI M-FUEL ROAD, BOMBIVIL (WEST) THANA - 421202. 430. SUNDARA AGED ABOUT 106 YEARS S/O BAGI R/AT. B-9, FLAT NO.6, MEERA NAGAR KORAGON PARK, POONA-411004. 431. K.V. AMIN ALIAS VISHWANTH AGED ABOUT 84 YEARS S/O LATE BHAVANI R/AT 35-1029, PANT NAGAR GHATKOPR, BOMBAY-400025. 432. RAGHAVA AMIN AGED ABOUT 81 YEARS S/O LATE BHAVANI R/AT C/O. P.B. NO.10263 EXPRESS PRINTING PRESS, SERVICE DUBAI UNITED ARAB EMIRATES. 433. VASANTH KUMAR AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS D/O SUNDARI R/AT. DOOR NO.401, 'B' SECTOR II KUDUREMUKH-577142. 434. SUHASINI S. ANCHAN AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS D/O SUNDARI R/AT 1-16, DIVISION NO.1 - 78 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB R.F.A. No.1968/2024 ANDERI (WEST), J.P. NAGAR BOMBAY-400058. 435. PALLAVI AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS D/O SUHASINI S. ANCHAN R/AT. 1-16, DIVISION NO.1 ANDERI (WEST), J.P. NAGAR BOMBAY-400058. 436. SURAJ AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS D/O SUHASINI S. ANCHAN R/AT 1-16, DIVISION NO.1 ANDERI (WEST) J.P. NAGAR, BOMBAY-400058. 437. POOVAMMA AGED ABOUT 93 YEARS WIDOW, LATE GOPAL R/AT DOOR NO 2-90, MAROLI DODDAMANE, (ANCHANNA MANE) MAROLI VILLAGE, POST KULASHEKAR MANGALORE 575005. 438. PUSHPAVATHI AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS D/O LATE GOPAL R/AT DOOR NO 2-90, MAROLI DODDAMANE, (ANCHANNA MANE) MAROLI VILLAGE, POST KULASHEKAR MANGALORE 575005. 439. UMESH AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS S/O LATE GOPAL R/AT DOOR NO 2-90, MAROLI DODDAMANE, (ANCHANNA MANE) MAROLI VILLAGE, POST KULASHEKAR MANGALORE 575005. - 79 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB R.F.A. No.1968/2024 440. MANOHARA AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS S/O LATE GOPAL R/AT DOOR NO 2-90, MAROLI DODDAMANE, (ANCHANNA MANE) MAROLI VILLAGE, POST KULASHEKAR MANGALORE 575005. 441. CHANDRASHEKARA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS D/O LATE GOPAL R/AT DOOR NO 2-90, MAROLI DODDAMANE, (ANCHANNA MANE) MAROLI VILLAGE, POST KULASHEKAR MANGALORE 575005. 442. UMAVATHY AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS D/O LATE GOPAL R/AT DOOR NO 2-90, MAROLI DODDAMANE, (ANCHANNA MANE) MAROLI VILLAGE, POST KULASHEKAR MANGALORE 575005. 443. HARISH AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS D/O LATE GOPAL R/AT DOOR NO 2-90, MAROLI DODDAMANE, (ANCHANNA MANE) MAROLI VILLAGE, POST KULASHEKAR MANGALORE 575005. 444. BHAVANISHANKARA AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS D/O LATE GOPAL R/AT DOOR NO 2-90, MAROLI DODDAMANE, (ANCHANNA MANE) MAROLI VILLAGE, POST KULASHEKAR MANGALORE 575005. - 80 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB R.F.A. No.1968/2024 445. KOOSAMMA AGED ABOUT 93 YEARS WIDOW, LATE MADAVA R/AT DOOR NO 2-90, MAROLI DODDAMANE, (ANCHANNA MANE) MAROLI VILLAGE, POST KULASHEKAR MANGALORE 575005. 446. JAGANATH AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS S/O LATE MADHAVA R/AT DOOR NO 2-90, MAROLI DODDAMANE, (ANCHANNA MANE) MAROLI VILLAGE, POST KULASHEKAR MANGALORE 575005. 447. CHANDRAVATHI AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS D/O LATE MADHAVA R/AT DOOR NO 2-90, MAROLI DODDAMANE, (ANCHANNA MANE) MAROLI VILLAGE, POST KULASHEKAR MANGALORE 575005. 448. DEVAPPA AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS S/O LATE MADHAVA R/AT DOOR NO 2-90, MAROLI DODDAMANE, (ANCHANNA MANE) MAROLI VILLAGE, POST KULASHEKAR MANGALORE 575005. 449. UPENDRA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS D/O LATE MADHAVA R/AT DOOR NO 2-90, MAROLI DODDAMANE, (ANCHANNA MANE) MAROLI VILLAGE, POST KULASHEKAR MANGALORE 575005. - 81 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB R.F.A. No.1968/2024 450. VIDYAVATHI AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS D/O LATE MADHAVA R/AT DOOR NO 2-90, MAROLI DODDAMANE, (ANCHANNA MANE) MAROLI VILLAGE, POST KULASHEKAR MANGALORE 575005. 451. VIJAYA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS D/O LATE MADHAVA R/AT DOOR NO 2-90, MAROLI DODDAMANE, (ANCHANNA MANE) MAROLI VILLAGE, POST KULASHEKAR MANGALORE 575005. 452. BABITHAKSHI AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS D/O LATE MADHAVA R/AT DOOR NO 2-90, MAROLI DODDAMANE, (ANCHANNA MANE) MAROLI VILLAGE, POST KULASHEKAR MANGALORE 575005. 453. BHASHAVATHI AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS D/O KOOSAMMA R/AT DOOR NO 2-91, MAROLI DODDAMANE, (ANCHANNA MANE) MAROLI VILLAGE, POST KULASHEKAR MANGALORE 575005. 454. LOHITHAKSHI AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS D/O KOOSAMMA R/AT DOOR NO 2-91, MAROLI DODDAMANE, (ANCHANNA MANE) MAROLI VILLAGE, POST KULASHEKAR MANGALORE 575005. 455. LAXMI AGED ABOUT 87 YEARS - 82 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB R.F.A. No.1968/2024 WIDOW LATE SHIVAPPA R/AT DOOR NO 2087, MAROLI DODDAMANE, (ANCHANNA MANE) MAROLI VILLAGE, POST KULASHEKAR MANGALORE 575005. 456. MOHAN AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS S/O LATE SHIVAPPA R/AT DOOR NO 2087, MAROLI DODDAMANE, (ANCHANNA MANE) MAROLI VILLAGE, POST KULASHEKAR MANGALORE 575005. 457. SHALINI AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS D/O LATE SHIVAPPA R/AT DOOR NO 2087, MAROLI DODDAMANE, (ANCHANNA MANE) MAROLI VILLAGE, POST KULASHEKAR MANGALORE 575005. 458. VANITHA AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS D/O LATE SHIVAPPA R/AT DOOR NO 2087, MAROLI DODDAMANE, (ANCHANNA MANE) MAROLI VILLAGE, POST KULASHEKAR MANGALORE 575005. 459. SACHINDANAND AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS S/O LATE SHIVAPPA R/AT DOOR NO 2087, MAROLI DODDAMANE, (ANCHANNA MANE) MAROLI VILLAGE, POST KULASHEKAR MANGALORE 575005. 460. MAMATHA AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS - 83 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB R.F.A. No.1968/2024 S/O LATE SHIVAPPA R/AT DOOR NO 2087, MAROLI DODDAMANE, (ANCHANNA MANE) MAROLI VILLAGE, POST KULASHEKAR MANGALORE 575005. 461. SABITHA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS D/O LAXMI R/AT DOOR NO 2087, MAROLI DODDAMANE, (ANCHANNA MANE) MAROLI VILLAGE, POST KULASHEKAR MANGALORE 575005. 462. YAMUNA AGED ABOUT 92 YEARS WIDOW LATE SUNDARA R/AT DOOR NO 2-87, MAROLI DODDAMANE, (ANCHANNA MANE) MAROLI VILLAGE, POST KULASHEKAR MANGALORE 575005. 463. RAVINDRA AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS S/O LATE SUNDARA R/AT DOOR NO 2-87, MAROLI DODDAMANE, (ANCHANNA MANE) MAROLI VILLAGE, POST KULASHEKAR MANGALORE 575005. 464. THILOTHAMA AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS S/O LATE SUNDARA R/AT DOOR NO 2-81, MAROLI DODDAMANE, (ANCHANNA MANE) MAROLI VILLAGE, POST KULASHEKAR MANGALORE 575005. 465. RANJINI AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS - 84 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB R.F.A. No.1968/2024 S/O LATE SUNDARA R/AT DOOR NO 2-81, MAROLI DODDAMANE, (ANCHANNA MANE) MAROLI VILLAGE, POST KULASHEKAR MANGALORE 575005. 466. HARINI AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS D/O LATE SUNDARA R/AT DOOR NO 2-81, MAROLI DODDAMANE, (ANCHANNA MANE) MAROLI VILLAGE, POST KULASHEKAR MANGALORE 575005. 467. KESHAVA AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS S/O LATE SUNDARA R/AT DOOR NO 2-81, MAROLI DODDAMANE, (ANCHANNA MANE) MAROLI VILLAGE, POST KULASHEKAR MANGALORE 575005. 468. ROHITHAKSHA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS S/O LATE SUNDARA R/AT DOOR NO 2-81, MAROLI DODDAMANE, (ANCHANNA MANE) MAROLI VILLAGE, POST KULASHEKAR MANGALORE 575005. 469. UDAYA AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS S/O LATE SUNDARA R/AT DOOR NO 2-81, MAROLI DODDAMANE, (ANCHANNA MANE) MAROLI VILLAGE, POST KULASHEKAR MANGALORE 575005. 470. JAYASHREE AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS - 85 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB R.F.A. No.1968/2024 S/O YAMUNA R/AT DOOR NO 2-81, MAROLI DODDAMANE, (ANCHANNA MANE) MAROLI VILLAGE, POST KULASHEKAR MANGALORE 575005. 471. LAXMI AGED ABOUT 86 YEARS WIDOW LATE VENKANNA R/AT DOOR NO 2-88(A), MAROLI DODDAMANE, (ANCHANNA MANE) MAROLI VILLAGE, POST KULASHEKAR MANGALORE 575005. 472. BHARATHA AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS S/O LATE VENKANNA R/AT DOOR NO 2-88(A), MAROLI DODDAMANE, (ANCHANNA MANE) MAROLI VILLAGE, POST KULASHEKAR MANGALORE 575005. 473. BHANUMATHI AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS D/O LATE VENKANNA R/AT DOOR NO 2-88(A), MAROLI DODDAMANE, (ANCHANNA MANE) MAROLI VILLAGE, POST KULASHEKAR MANGALORE 575005. 474. DEVADAS AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS D/O LATE VENKANNA R/AT DOOR NO 2-88(A), MAROLI DODDAMANE, (ANCHANNA MANE) MAROLI VILLAGE, POST KULASHEKAR MANGALORE 575005. 475. SUREKHA AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS - 86 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB R.F.A. No.1968/2024 D/O LATE VENKANNA R/AT DOOR NO 2-88(A), MAROLI DODDAMANE, (ANCHANNA MANE) MAROLI VILLAGE, POST KULASHEKAR MANGALORE 575005. 476. MALLIKA AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS D/O LATE VENKANNA R/AT DOOR NO 2-88(A), MAROLI DODDAMANE, (ANCHANNA MANE) MAROLI VILLAGE, POST KULASHEKAR MANGALORE 575005. 477. GOPALA AGED ABOUT 104 YEARS S/O LATE SANKAMMA R/AT DOOR NO 2-88(1), MAROLI DODDAMANE, MAROLI VILLAGE POST KULASHEKAR MANGALORE 575005. 478. RAMADAS AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS S/O PARVATHY R/AT MAROLI DODDAMANE, (ANCHANNA MANE) MAROLI VILLAGE, POST KULASHEKAR MANGALORE 575005. 479. GIRIJA AGED ABOUT 81 YEARS D/O JANAMMA R/AT NAGAPPA COMPOUND, JEPPU KANKANADY POST MANGALORE-575002. 480. PARVATHI AGED ABOUT 91 YEARS D/O MANAPPA - 87 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB R.F.A. No.1968/2024 R/AT. UMIKAN, SARIPALLA POST KULASHEKAR MANGALORE-575005. 481. SHOBHA AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS D/O PARVATHI R/AT. UMIKAN, SARIPALLA POST KULASHEKAR MANGALORE-575005. 482. SHASHIKALA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS D/O PARVATHI R/AT. UMIKAN, SARIPALLA POST KULASHEKAR MANGALORE-575005. 483. ARASAPPA AGED ABOUT 107 YEARS S/O SESU R/AT DOOR NO.2-88(A) MAROLI (ANCHANAMANE) MAROLI VILLAGE POST KULASHEKAR MANGALORE 57005. 484. ANANDA AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS S/O SHARADA R/AT. NEAR B.M. TILE FACTORY MAROLI KEMBR MANGALORE-575005. 485. HARISCHANDRA AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS S/O SHARADA ACHANNA R/AT. DODDAMEN, MAROLI POST KULASHEKAR MANGALORE-575005. - 88 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB R.F.A. No.1968/2024 486. SHESHAPPA AGED ABOUT 106 YEARS S/O POOVAPPA R/AT. ACHANNAMANE, MAROLI POST KULASHEKAR MANGALORE-575005. …RESPONDENTS - - - THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF CPC, PRAYING TO CALL FOR RECORDS IN O.S.NO.87/1991 ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDL. C.J. (SR.DN.) & CJM MANGALORE D.K. SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 31.07.2003 IN O.S.NO.87/1991 ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDL. C.J. (SR.DN.) & CJM MANGALORE, D.K. & ETC. THIS APPEAL HAVING BEEN HEARD AND RESERVED ON 25.02.2026, COMING ON FOR PRONOUNCEMENT OF JUDGMENT, THIS DAY VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL CAV JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) This appeal is filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the judgment and decree dated 31.07.2003 passed in O.S.No.87/1991 by the Court of the II Additional Civil Judge (Sr. Dn.) and CJM, Mangalore, D.K.District. - 89 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB R.F.A. No.1968/2024 2. One Chennamma @ Parvathi and others have filed a suit for partition of the suit schedule property by metes and bounds and for delivery of their shares of the suit schedule property. The said suit came to be decreed with costs, plaintiff and defendant Nos.1 to 94 and defendant Nos.135 to 144 were held entitled to the share as mentioned in the judgment and the other defendants were also held entitled to the share as mentioned. The appellant claiming to be one of the legal heirs of Smt.Kochu, has filed this appeal stating that she was not arrayed as a party to the suit and she has a right and interest over the suit schedule property. The appeal is filed along with an application seeking condonation of delay of 7039 days. 3. The learned counsel for the appellant reiterates the grounds urged in the appeal and submits that the appellant is the grand daughter of Smt.Kochu and without making her as a party to the suit, the suit was decreed. - 90 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB R.F.A. No.1968/2024 Hence, she is challenging the judgment and decree dated 31.07.2003 as she was not having knowledge about the same. Hence, he seeks to condone the delay and consider the appeal on merits. 4. We have heard the learned counsel for the appellant and meticulously perused the affidavit accompanying the application for condonation of delay and the other material available on record. 5. The pleading in the appeal does not indicate as to how the appellant is aggrieved by the judgment and decree under challenge. The appellant claims to be the grand daughter of one Smt.Kochu. However, the memorandum of appeal is silent with regard to Smt.Kochu being a plaintiff or defendant in the suit. The statement of facts or the grounds urged in the appeal do not indicate the right of the appellant to file this appeal. Be that as it may, the present appeal is filed with a delay of 7039 days which is nearly 20 years from the date of judgment and - 91 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB R.F.A. No.1968/2024 decree. The affidavit accompanying the application seeking for condonation of delay indicates that the appellant was not a party before the Trial Court in O.S.No.87/1991, the appellant could not take steps to file the above appeal due to the fact that she was minor and not aware about the judgment and decree, had financial difficulties, she could not approach the advocate to file an appeal and only after mobilizing the funds, she preferred an appeal and hence, the delay is unintentional and beyond her control and she has a good case on merits. The aforesaid cause shown in paragraphs 2 and 3 of the affidavit cannot be termed as sufficient cause to condone the delay of 7039 days in preferring the appeal. 6. The Hon'ble Supreme Court, in the following cases has laid down the law with regard to consideration of the application for condonation of delay. In the judgment in BASAWARAJ AND ANOTHER Vs. SPECIAL - 92 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB R.F.A. No.1968/2024 LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER1, the Hon'ble Supreme Court in paragraph Nos.11 to 15 has held as under: "11. The expression “sufficient cause” should be given a liberal interpretation to ensure that substantial justice is done, but only so long as negligence, inaction or lack of bona fides cannot be imputed to the party concerned, whether or not sufficient cause has been furnished, can be decided on the facts of a particular case and no straitjacket formula is possible. (Vide Madanlal v. Shyamlal [(2002) 1 SCC 535 : AIR 2002 SC 100] and Ram Nath Sao v. Gobardhan Sao [(2002) 3 SCC 195 : AIR 2002 SC 1201] .) 12. It is a settled legal proposition that law of limitation may harshly affect a particular party but it has to be applied with all its rigour when the statute so prescribes. The court has no power to extend the period of limitation on equitable grounds. “A result flowing from a statutory provision is never an evil. A court has no power to ignore that provision to relieve what it considers a distress resulting from its operation.” The statutory provision may cause hardship or inconvenience to a particular party but the court has 1 (2013) 14 SCC 81 - 93 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB R.F.A. No.1968/2024 no choice but to enforce it giving full effect to the same. The legal maxim dura lex sed lex which means “the law is hard but it is the law”, stands attracted in such a situation. It has consistently been held that, “inconvenience is not” a decisive factor to be considered while interpreting a statute. 13. The statute of limitation is founded on public policy, its aim being to secure peace in the community, to suppress fraud and perjury, to quicken diligence and to prevent oppression. It seeks to bury all acts of the past which have not been agitated unexplainably and have from lapse of time become stale. According to Halsbury's Laws of England, Vol. 28, p. 266: “605. Policy of the Limitation Acts.—The courts have expressed at least three differing reasons supporting the existence of statutes of limitations namely, (1) that long dormant claims have more of cruelty than justice in them, (2) that a defendant might have lost the evidence to disprove a stale claim, and (3) that persons with good causes of actions should pursue them with reasonable diligence.” An unlimited limitation would lead to a sense of insecurity and uncertainty, and therefore, limitation prevents disturbance or deprivation of what may have been acquired in equity and justice by long enjoyment or what may have been lost by a party's own inaction, negligence or laches. (See Popat and Kotecha Property v. SBI Staff Assn. [(2005) 7 SCC 510] , Rajender Singh v. Santa Singh [(1973) 2 SCC 705 : AIR 1973 SC 2537] and Pundlik Jalam Patil v. Jalgaon Medium Project [(2008) 17 SCC 448 : (2009) 5 SCC (Civ) 907] .) - 94 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB R.F.A. No.1968/2024 14. In P. Ramachandra Rao v. State of Karnataka [(2002) 4 SCC 578 : 2002 SCC (Cri) 830 : AIR 2002 SC 1856] this Court held that judicially engrafting principles of limitation amounts to legislating and would fly in the face of law laid down by the Constitution Bench in Abdul Rehman Antulay v. R.S. Nayak [(1992) 1 SCC 225 : 1992 SCC (Cri) 93 : AIR 1992 SC 1701] . 15. The law on the issue can be summarised to the effect that where a case has been presented in the court beyond limitation, the applicant has to explain the court as to what was the “sufficient cause” which means an adequate and enough reason which prevented him to approach the court within limitation. In case a party is found to be negligent, or for want of bona fide on his part in the facts and circumstances of the case, or found to have not acted diligently or remained inactive, there cannot be a justified ground to condone the delay. No court could be justified in condoning such an inordinate delay by imposing any condition whatsoever. The application is to be decided only within the parameters laid down by this Court in regard to the condonation of delay. In case there was no sufficient cause to prevent a litigant to approach the court on time condoning the delay - 95 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB R.F.A. No.1968/2024 without any justification, putting any condition whatsoever, amounts to passing an order in violation of the statutory provisions and it tantamounts to showing utter disregard to the legislature." (Emphasis supplied) 7. In the case of SHEO RAJ SINGH Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS2, the Hon'ble Supreme Court has held in paragraph Nos.30 to 36 as under: "30. Considering the aforementioned decisions, there cannot be any quarrel that this Court has stepped in to ensure that substantive rights of private parties and the State are not defeated at the threshold simply due to technical considerations of delay. However, these decisions notwithstanding, we reiterate that condonation of delay being a discretionary power available to courts, exercise of discretion must necessarily depend upon the sufficiency of the cause shown and the degree of acceptability of the explanation, the length of delay being immaterial. 31. Sometimes, due to want of sufficient cause being shown or an acceptable explanation being proffered, delay of the shortest range may not be condoned whereas, in certain other cases, delay of long periods 2 (2023) 10 SCC 531 - 96 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB R.F.A. No.1968/2024 can be condoned if the explanation is satisfactory and acceptable. Of course, the courts must distinguish between an “explanation” and an “excuse”. An “explanation” is designed to give someone all of the facts and lay out the cause for something. It helps clarify the circumstances of a particular event and allows the person to point out that something that has happened is not his fault, if it is really not his fault. Care must, however, be taken to distinguish an “explanation” from an “excuse”. Although people tend to see “explanation” and “excuse” as the same thing and struggle to find out the difference between the two, there is a distinction which, though fine, is real. 32. An “excuse” is often offered by a person to deny responsibility and consequences when under attack. It is sort of a defensive action. Calling something as just an “excuse” would imply that the explanation proffered is believed not to be true. Thus said, there is no formula that caters to all situations and, therefore, each case for condonation of delay based on existence or absence of sufficient cause has to be decided on its own facts. At this stage, we cannot but lament that it is only excuses, and not explanations, that are more often accepted for condonation of long delays to safeguard public interest from those hidden forces whose sole agenda - 97 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB R.F.A. No.1968/2024 is to ensure that a meritorious claim does not reach the higher courts for adjudication. 33. Be that as it may, it is important to bear in mind that we are not hearing an application for condonation of delay but sitting in appeal over a discretionary order of the High Court granting the prayer for condonation of delay. In the case of the former, whether to condone or not would be the only question whereas in the latter, whether there has been proper exercise of discretion in favour of grant of the prayer for condonation would be the question. Law is fairly well-settled that “a court of appeal should not ordinarily interfere with the discretion exercised by the courts below”. If any authority is required, we can profitably refer to the decision in Manjunath Anandappa v. Tammanasa [Manjunath Anandappa v. Tammanasa, (2003) 10 SCC 390] , which in turn relied on the decision in Gujarat Steel Tubes Ltd. v. Gujarat Steel Tubes Mazdoor Sabha [Gujarat Steel Tubes Ltd. v. Gujarat Steel Tubes Mazdoor Sabha, (1980) 2 SCC 593 : 1980 SCC (L&S) 197] where it has been held that: “an appellate power interferes not when the order appealed is not right but only when it is clearly wrong”. 34. The order under challenge in this appeal is dated 21-12-2011 [Union of India v. Sheo Raj, 2011 SCC OnLine Del 5511] . It was rendered at a point of time - 98 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB R.F.A. No.1968/2024 when the decisions in Katiji [Collector (LA) v. Katiji, (1987) 2 SCC 107] , Ramegowda [G. Ramegowda v. LAO, (1988) 2 SCC 142] , Chandra Mani [State of Haryana v. Chandra Mani, (1996) 3 SCC 132] , K.V. Ayisumma [Tehsildar (LA) v. K.V. Ayisumma, (1996) 10 SCC 634] and Lipok AO [State of Nagaland v. Lipok Ao, (2005) 3 SCC 752 : 2005 SCC (Cri) 906] were holding the field. It is not that the said decisions do not hold the field now, having been overruled by any subsequent decision. Although there have been some decisions in the recent past [State of M.P. v. Bherulal [State of M.P. v. Bherulal, (2020) 10 SCC 654 : (2021) 1 SCC (Civ) 101 : (2021) 1 SCC (Cri) 117 : (2021) 1 SCC (L&S) 84] is one such decision apart from University of Delhi [University of Delhi v. Union of India, (2020) 13 SCC 745] ] which have not accepted governmental lethargy, tardiness and indolence in presenting appeals within time as sufficient cause for condonation of delay, yet, the exercise of discretion by the High Court has to be tested on the anvil of the liberal and justice oriented approach expounded in the aforesaid decisions which have been referred to above. 35. We find that the High Court in the present case assigned the following reasons in support of its order: - 99 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB R.F.A. No.1968/2024 35.1. The law of limitation was founded on public policy, and that some lapse on the part of a litigant, by itself, would not be sufficient to deny condonation of delay as the same could cause miscarriage of justice. 35.2. The expression “sufficient cause” is elastic enough for courts to do substantial justice. Further, when substantial justice and technical considerations are pitted against one another, the former would prevail. 35.3. It is upon the courts to consider the sufficiency of cause shown for the delay, and the length of delay is not always decisive while exercising discretion in such matters if the delay is properly explained. Further, the merits of a claim were also to be considered when deciding such applications for condonation of delay. 35.4. Further, a distinction should be drawn between inordinate unexplained delay and explained delay, where in the present case, the first respondent had sufficiently explained the delay on account of negligence on part of the government functionaries and the government counsel on record before the Reference Court. - 100 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB R.F.A. No.1968/2024 35.5. The officer responsible for the negligence would be liable to suffer and not public interest through the State. The High Court felt inclined to take a pragmatic view since the negligence therein did not border on callousness. 36. Given these reasons, we do not consider discretion to have been exercised by the High Court in an arbitrary manner. The order under challenge had to be a clearly wrong order so as to be liable for interference, which it is not." (Emphasis supplied) 8. The Hon'ble Supreme Court, in the aforesaid judgments has taken note of its earlier judgment in the case of KATIJI referred to supra and held that the approach of the Courts in condoning the delay should be pragmatic when sufficient cause is shown. In the instant case, the cause shown by the appellant is not sufficient to condone the enormous delay of nearly 20 years. 9. It would also be useful to refer to the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of PATHAPATI SUBBA REDDY Vs. SPECIAL DEPUTY COLLECTOR - 101 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB R.F.A. No.1968/2024 (LA)3, wherein the Hon'ble Supreme Court has held in paragraph Nos.15, 16, 17 and 26 as under: "15. It is in the light of the public policy upon which law of limitation is based, the object behind the law of limitation and the mandatory and the directory nature of Section 3 and Section 5 of the Limitation Act that we have to examine and strike a balance between Section 3 and Section 5 of the Limitation Act in the matters of condoning the delay. 16. Generally, the courts have adopted a very liberal approach in construing the phrase ‘sufficient cause’ used in Section 5 of the Limitation Act in order to condone the delay to enable the courts to do substantial justice and to apply law in a meaningful manner which subserves the ends of justice. In Collector, Land Acquisition, Anantnag v. Katiji2, this Court in advocating the liberal approach in condoning the delay for ‘sufficient cause’ held that ordinarily a litigant does not stand to benefit by lodging an appeal late; it is not necessary to explain every day's delay in filing the appeal; and since sometimes refusal to condone delay may result in throwing out a meritorious matter, it is necessary in the interest of justice that cause of substantial 3 2024 SCCOnline SC 513 - 102 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB R.F.A. No.1968/2024 justice should be allowed to prevail upon technical considerations and if the delay is not deliberate, it ought to be condoned. Notwithstanding the above, howsoever, liberal approach is adopted in condoning the delay, existence of ‘sufficient cause’ for not filing the appeal in time, is a condition precedent for exercising the discretionary power to condone the delay. The phrases ‘liberal approach’, ‘justice- oriented approach’ and cause for the advancement of ‘substantial justice’ cannot be employed to defeat the law of limitation so as to allow stale matters or as a matter of fact dead matters to be revived and re-opened by taking aid of Section 5 of the Limitation Act. 17. It must always be borne in mind that while construing ‘sufficient cause’ in deciding application under Section 5 of the Act, that on the expiry of the period of limitation prescribed for filing an appeal, substantive right in favour of a decree-holder accrues and this right ought not to be lightly disturbed. The decree-holder treats the decree to be binding with the lapse of time and may proceed on such assumption creating new rights. 26. On a harmonious consideration of the provisions of the law, as aforesaid, and the law laid down by this Court, it is evident that: - 103 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB R.F.A. No.1968/2024 (i) Law of limitation is based upon public policy that there should be an end to litigation by forfeiting the right to remedy rather than the right itself; (ii) A right or the remedy that has not been exercised or availed of for a long time must come to an end or cease to exist after a fixed period of time; (iii) The provisions of the Limitation Act have to be construed differently, such as Section 3 has to be construed in a strict sense whereas Section 5 has to be construed liberally; (iv) In order to advance substantial justice, though liberal approach, justice-oriented approach or cause of substantial justice may be kept in mind but the same cannot be used to defeat the substantial law of limitation contained in Section 3 of the Limitation Act; (v) Courts are empowered to exercise discretion to condone the delay if sufficient cause had been explained, but - 104 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB R.F.A. No.1968/2024 that exercise of power is discretionary in nature and may not be exercised even if sufficient cause is established for various factors such as, where there is inordinate delay, negligence and want of due diligence; (vi) Merely some persons obtained relief in similar matter, it does not mean that others are also entitled to the same benefit if the court is not satisfied with the cause shown for the delay in filing the appeal; (vii) Merits of the case are not required to be considered in condoning the delay; and (viii) Delay condonation application has to be decided on the parameters laid down for condoning the delay and condoning the delay for the reason that the conditions have been imposed, tantamounts to disregarding the statutory provision." (emphasis supplied) - 105 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB R.F.A. No.1968/2024 10. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in the aforesaid judgments has considered its earlier judgments in the case of KATIJI and BASAWARAJ AND ANOTHER referred to supra and held that the phrases 'liberal approach', 'justice oriented approach' and 'cause for advancement of substantial justice' cannot be employed to defeat the law of limitation so as to allow the stale matter to be revived and reopened by taking shelter under Section 5 of the Limitation Act. Further, it has been held that no Courts would be justified in condoning such inordinate delay by imposing any condition whatsoever. 11. Keeping in mind the enunciation of law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court referred to supra, we are of the considered view that the appellant has failed to show sufficient cause to condone the enormous delay of 7039 days. The averments made in the affidavit accompanying the application for condonation of delay are extremely vague and do not provide a satisfactory explanation to condone such an enormous delay. The - 106 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB R.F.A. No.1968/2024 condonation of enormous delay as sought by the appellant is nothing but a revival of the dead right of the appellant. Allowing the application would run contrary to the public policy and cause great injustice to the respondents. The Court is also required to keep in mind the finality of the lis between the parties while condoning the delay. If Courts start interpreting the word 'sufficient cause' in an unduly liberal way even without there being any acceptable explanation for condoning the enormous delay, it would lead to unsettling the rights of the parties which were settled by the Trial Court long ago. In the instant case, the appellant has failed to show the sufficient cause to condone the delay. 12. For the aforementioned reasons, we are of the considered view that the appellant has failed to show the sufficient cause to condone the delay of 7039 days in preferring the appeal. Hence, we proceed to pass the following: - 107 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB R.F.A. No.1968/2024 ORDER I.A.No.1/2024 is dismissed. Consequently, the appeal and other pending applications are dismissed. Sd/- (ANU SIVARAMAN) JUDGE Sd/- (VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) JUDGE RV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 6