Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9453 (CAL)

JITENDRA SHAW @ JITU v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL

CRM(M)/731/2026 · 2026-04-17

Tirthankar Ghosh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

17.04.2026 Court No.35. D/L. 167. Kausik (Allowed) CRM (M) 731 of 2026 In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023/ Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 in connection with Noapara Police Station Case No. 95 of 2024 dated 23.06.2024 under sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. And In the matter of : Jitendra Shaw @ Jitu ……Petitioner. Mr. Sourov Mondal Mr. Monojit Debnath Mr. Arijit Bhuiya Mr. Rony Mondal ……for the Petitioner. Mr. Subhamoy Bhattacharya Ms. Sanjida Sultana ……for the State. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that petitioner is in custody for more than 7 months and charge sheet has already been submitted, as such further detention of the present petitioner is unwarranted. Learned advocate for the State has opposed the prayer for bail and produced the case diary. I have taken into account the post-mortem report as well as the communication of the Doctor to the Officer-in- Charge of Noapara Police Station. Having regard to the unfortunate incident and that the petitioner is in custody for 2 more than 7 months as also the prosecution intends to rely upon 11 witnesses in order to prove its case which will consume some time, I am of the view that further incarceration of the present petitioner is unwarranted. As such the prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed. Accordingly, Petitioner, namely, Jitendra Shaw @ Jitu shall furnish bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand Only) with two sureties of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) each. One of whom must be local to the satisfaction of Learned ACJM, Barrackpore. If on bail, petitioner shall be physically present on each and every date fixed before the learned Trial Court and shall not leave the jurisdiction of District of 24 Parganas North without the prior permission of the learned Trial Court. Accordingly, CRM (M) 731 of 2026 is allowed. All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)