ARJUN ANTIL ALIAS RAHUL v. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER
CRM-M/16435/2026 · 2026-04-01
H S Grewal
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 945 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 945 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 216
AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-16435-2026 Date of decision: 01.04.2026 ARJUN ANTIL @ RAHUL ...PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR ...RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.GREWAL Present: Mr. Rakesh Kumar Lathwal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Vijay Kumar, AAG, Haryana. **** H.S.GREWAL,J. (ORAL)
1. Custody certificate has been filed by ld. State counsel in the Court today and the same is taken on record.
2. Mr. Ketan Antil, Advocate appears and filed his Vakalatnama on behalf of respondent No.2 in the Court today and the same is taken on record.
3. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the present petition at this stage.
4. Allowed to do so.
5. Dismissed as withdrawn at this stage.
6. However, the petitioner shall be at liberty to move a fresh application for bail in case the trial does not make substantial progress. 01.04.2026 (H.S.GREWAL) renu
JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No RENU RAWAT 2026.04.01 14.38 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh