[2026:RJ-JP:24837] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8060/2026 URN: CRLMB / 14719U / 2026 Ran Singh S/o Chandgiram, Aged About 58 Years, R/o Nalpur, Police Station Mehada, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.) (At Present Petitioner Is Confined In Sub Jail Khetri District Jhunjhunu) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Raj Kumar Kasana For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP Mr. Siddhant Choudhary Mr. Aditya Pratap Singh Nirwan HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 03/07/2026 1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.133/2024 registered at Police Station Mehada, District Neem Ka Thana for offences under Sections 420, 406, 120-B of IPC, 1860. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor as well as learned counsel for the complainant and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He submits that the petitioner is neither the seller nor the purchaser of the land; rather, he is only an attesting witness to the sale deed. Petitioner is behind the bars since 28.04.2026 though nine cases have been reported against him, however, in four cases he has got the order of acquittal and in remaining cases he is already on the bail. The [2026:RJ-JP:24837] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-8060/2026] matter is exclusively triable by the Magistrate. Charge-sheet has already been filed. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody, consequently, the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor and learned counsel for the complainant have vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. Learned counsel for the complainant submits that the petitioner by inducing the complainant has wrongfully sold his property and on the complete trust reposed in the petitioner, the complainant signed the sale deed. It is therefore contended that the petitioner has cheated the complainant by wrongful inducement. Therefore, the bail application of the petitioner may not be allowed. 6. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in light of submission made on behalf of petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner. 7. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Ran Singh S/o Chandgiram, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Chandan/161