Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9448 (BOM)

ROHIT ENTERPRISES THROUGH ITS PROP SOMESHWAR MAHADEV BHOSALE v. MANGAL BHARAT POKHARKAR AND ANR

WP/4074/2024 · 2026-09-17

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

13-wp.4074.2024.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.4074 OF 2024 M/s. Rohit enterprises through it’s Prop. Someshwar Mahadev Bhosale ...Petitioner Versus Mangal Bharat Pokharkar and Anr. ...Respondents None for the Petitioner. CORAM: ASHISH S. CHAVAN, J. DATE : 17th SEPTEMBER 2026 P.C. : 1. None appears for the petitioner. 2. By way of this writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the summoning order dated 23rd December 2015, which inter alia issued process against the petitioner under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Although the petition was filed in August 2024, when it was listed before this court on 18th November 2024, the counsel appearing for the petitioner sought accommodation on the ground that N. S. Chitnis 1/2 NISHA SANDEEP CHITNIS Digitally signed by NISHA SANDEEP CHITNIS Date: 2026.09.21 12:09:46 +0530 13-wp.4074.2024.doc the arguing counsel was facing some personal difficulty. Thereafter, neither the counsel for the petitioner nor the petitioner has taken any efforts to obtain circulation or seek relief as prayed for in the petition. From the conduct of the petitioner, it is evident that he is not desirous of prosecuting the writ petition. Consequently, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. ASHISH S. CHAVAN, J. N. S. Chitnis 2/2