Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9447 (JHR)

MAHENDAR YADAV ALIAS MAHENDAR GOPE v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./6710/2025 · 2026-02-05

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:3050 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI A.B.A. No. 6710 of 2025 ---- 1.Mahendar Yadav @ Mahendar Gope, aged about 33 years, son of Somer Gope 2.Muni Kumari, aged about 28 years, wife of Mahendar Yadav @ Mahendar Gope, Both resident of Village Akdoni, Kala Post, PO Giridih, PS Giridih(M), Dist. Giridih .... Petitioners -- Versus -- The State of Jharkhand .... Opposite Party ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI --- For the Petitioners :- Mr. Vijoy Kr Roy, Advocate For the State :- Mr. Rakesh Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Informant :- Mr. Ankit Kumar, Advocate ---- 2/05.02.2026 Heard learned counsels for petitioners, the respondent State as well as the informant. 2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Giridih(M) P.S.Case No.188 of 2025, for offence registered under section 126(2), 115(2), 118, 352, 74, 109, 3(5) of BNS, 2023, pending in court of learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Giridih. 3. Leaned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case and the altercation took place due to some domestic dispute. He further submits that there are general and omnibus allegations against all the accused persons. 4. Learned counsels for the respondent State as well as the informant oppose the prayer and submit that allegations are there of assault and even of molestation and the injury upon the body of the informant has been found to be grievous. 5. After some argument, the learned counsel for the petitioners 2026:JHHC:3050 2 submits that he may kindly be allowed to withdraw the prayer for anticipatory bail in respect of petitioner no.1, namely, Mahendar Yadav @ Mahendar Gope with liberty to file regular bail petition in the learned court concerned. 6. Learned counsel for the respondent State as well as the informant have got no objection for the same. 7. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn so far as the petitioner no.1, namely, Mahendar Yadav @ Mahendar Gope is concerned, with the aforesaid liberty. 8. Considering that there are general and omnibus allegations against the petitioner no.2, namely, Muni Kumari and only allegation is made against her of assault by feasts, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to petitioner no.2. 9. Accordingly, petitioner no.2, namely, Muni Kumari, is hereby directed to surrender before learned court within three weeks from today, and in event of her surrender/arrest, petitioner no.2, above named, shall be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand), with two sureties of like amount each, to satisfaction of learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Giridih, in connection with Giridih (M) P.S. Case No.188 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under section 482(2) of Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023. ( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) 05.02.2026 SI/