[2026:RJ-JP:24788] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8623/2026 URN: CRLMB / 15752U / 2026 Tej Singh Sansi S/o Shri Rohit Sansi, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Chauth Ka Barwada, Police Station Chauth Ka Barwada, District Sawaimadhopur. (Presently Petitioner Confined In District Jail At Tonk). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Narsi Prasad Sharma For Respondent(s) : Ms. Manju Dave, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 03/07/2026 1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.49/2026 registered at Police Station Banetha, District Tonk for offences under Sections 8, 20 and 21 of NDPS Act, 1985. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He submits that nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the present petitioner. The only allegation against petitioner is that he is the registered owner of the vehicle involved in the present case. It is further submitted that the co-accused namely Ramniwas, Rinkesh Sansi have been enlarged on bail by this Court on 26.05.2026 and [2026:RJ-JP:24788] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-8623/2026] co-accused Afsar Ali has been enlarged on bail on 30.04.2026, from whose possession the alleged contraband was recovered. Petitioner is behind the bars since 08.05.2026 though three cases have been reported against him, however, two cases are of different nature and in all the cases he is already on the bail. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody and on the ground of parity with other co-accused, the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in light of submission made on behalf of petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner. 6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Tej Singh Sansi S/o Shri Rohit Sansi, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Chandan/53