Page 1 of 2. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No. 9611 of 2026 Dr. Prakasini Dalai ..... Petitioner Mr. K.C. Sahu, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha & Ors. ..... Opposite Parties Mr. A. Tripathy, AGA CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY ORDER 31.03.2026 Order No. 01 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode. 2. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned counsel appearing for the Opp. Parties. 3. Petitioner has filed the present writ petition inter alia with the following prayer:- “It is therefore prayed that this Hon’ble Court be graciously pleased to allow the present writ petition by directing the Opp. Parties for allowing the antedated regularization of service of the petitioner from the date of her initial appointment by granting all consequential service and financial benefits including governing her service under GPF(O) & Old Pension Rules in order to be eligible to get the pensionary benefits at part with his batchmates of HMOs keeping in view of the order of Hon’ble Supreme Court dtd. 16.04.2024 under Annexure- 7 & 8 (Series) which has been implemented by the govt. extending the benefits as per Annexure-9, dtd. 03.09.2025 within a time bound period for the interest of justice. Page 2 of 2. And may further be pleased to pass any other order(s) as deems fit & proper for the bonafide interest of justice. And for the said act of kindness, the petitioner as in duty bound shall ever pray.” 4. However, taking into account the claim raised in the present Writ Petition, liberty is granted to the Petitioner to make a fresh representation before Opp. Party No.1 by enclosing all the relevant documents and citations in support of his claim, if any, within a period of three (3) weeks hence. 5. It is observed that if such representation is filed within the aforesaid time period, Opp. Party No. 1 shall do well to take a lawful decision on the same within a period of three (3) months from the date of receipt of such representation. The order so passed by Opp. Party No. 1 be communicated to the Petitioner. 6. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of. (BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY) Judge Jyoti