Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9439 (UTT)

GAURAV KUMAR v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

ABA/1096/2023 · 2026-08-11

Alok Mahra

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

UKHC010193942023 2026:UHC:7123 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS ABA/1096/2023 Gaurav Kumar --Applicant Versus State Of Uttarakhand --Respondent Hon'ble Alok Mahra, J. Ms. Shazia Parveen proxy counsel for Mr. Parikshit Saini, learned counsel for the applicants. 2. Mr. Askhay Latwal, learned A.G.A. for the State. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant would submit that during the pendency of the present anticipatory bail application, the proceedings in question have been quashed by the learned Trial Court; consequently, the present anticipatory bail application has rendered infructuous. 4. Learned State counsel does not dispute the aforesaid factual position. 5. In view of the aforesaid development, the present anticipatory bail application is dismissed as having become infructuous. 6. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of accordingly. (Alok Mahra, J.) 11.08.2026 Mamta MA MTA RANI Digitally signed by MAMTA RANI DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=6a812005bebfcf46f2 44f3e584af1449e430ef900bf0 9a6d67ebbd642671329b, postalCode=263001, st=Uttarakhand, serialNumber=5de1751a4f1d 9cabfd54852c9e68911ca8b66 dd26690a191648ab5d8dd004 ef0, cn=MAMTA RANI Date: 2026.08.13 11:33:19 +05'30'