HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 35809 of 2026 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE VIVEK SARAN, J. 1. Heard Sri Rohit Nandan Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed with the following relief:- "(i) To issue a writ, or direction in the nature of Certiorari for quashing impugned order dated 03.09.2022 and 20.07.2023 passed by Nayab Tahsildar in Case No. 5500/2022, Guruvachan Singh Vs. Garima Singh, order dated 13.06.2024 passed by Upziladikhari in Appeal No. 2902/2024, Siddharth Vs. Guruvachan Singh and order dated 11.06.2026 passed by Addl. Commissioner, Moradabad Division, Moradabad in revision No. 1578/2024, Siddharth Singh Vs. Guruvachan Singh and others. (Annexure No. 1 and 2)." 3. At the very outset, learned Standing Counsel raised a preliminary objection about the maintainability of the writ petition and submits that the instant proceedings have arisen out of proceeding under Section 35 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, which are summary in nature being mutation proceedings and do not determine any right to the petitioner. He places reliance on the judgement of Co-ordinate Bench of this Court passed in Writ-B No. 295 of 2022 (Smt. Kalawati Vs. Board of Revenue and 6 others). 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner could not dispute the legal position. 5. In such view of the matter, the instant writ petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to take such recourse, as available under law. September 23, 2026 gp Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rohit Nandan Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : Arun Kumar Pandey, C.S.C. (Vivek Saran,J.) Siddharth Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 8 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- GANESH PRAKASH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad