Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL CANCELLATION APPLICATION No. - 103 of 2026 Court No. - 68 (Sl. No. 69 out of 131) HON'BLE KRISHAN PAHAL, J.
1. List has been revised.
2. Heard Sri Kaushal Mishra, learned counsel for applicant, Sri Nafees Ahmad, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 and perused the material placed on record.
3. The present bail cancellation application has been filed for cancelling the bail granted to opposite party no.2 by this Court vide order dated 13.10.2025 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.28636 of 2025, arising out of Case Crime No.0067 of 2025, under Sections 103(1), 61(2) BNS, Police Station Kotwali Dehat, District Bijnor.
4. Learned counsel for the applicant has stated that opposite party no. has misused the bail granted to him earlier on. He threatened the applicant to face dire consequences, as he is the main witness in the incident. There is FIR No. 238 of 2025 instituted against opposite party no.2 and his wife Shaili Tyagi, as such, the bail granted to opposite party no.2 vide order dated 13.10.2025 is liable to be set-aside.
5. Per contra, learned counsel for opposite party no.2 has opposed the bail cancellation application on the ground that there is no medical corroboration of the allegations made in the FIR.The said FIR has only been instituted with an ulterior motive to somehow get the bail granted to the opposite party no. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Anand Dev Dwivedee, Indrajeet Kumar Shukla, Kaushal Mishra, Vinaya Kumar Diwvadi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Nafees Ahmad Ved Prakash Sharma .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s)
2 cancelled.
6. Learned counsel for opposite party no.2 has further stated that the only purpose of the applicant herein is to keep opposite party no.2 behind bar.
7. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the fact that there is no medical corroboration of the incident and there is no other cogent ground to set-aside the bail granted to opposite party no.2, I do not find it a fit case for setting-aside the order dated 13.10.2025 passed by this Court.
8. The present bail cancellation application is hereby found devoid of merits and is accordingly rejected. September 21, 2026 Shalini BAILC No. 103 of 2026 2 (Krishan Pahal,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHALINI JAISWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad