[2026:RJ-JP:25107] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2734/2026 URN: CW / 5939U / 2026 1. M/s Krishna Gopal Ayurved Bhawan (Dharmarth Trust), Trust Office F-15-16, Industrial Area, Parbatpura, Ajmer Through Its Chariman. 2. The Secretary, M/s Krishna Gopal Ayurved Bhawan (Dharmarth Trust), Trust Office F-15-16, Industrial Area, Parbatpura, Ajmer 3. The Additional Secretary, M/s Krishna Gopal Ayurved Bhawan (Dharmarth Trust), Trust Office F-15-16, Industrial Area, Parbatpura, Ajmer ----Petitioners Versus 1. M/s Krishna Gopal Kaleda Ayurved Bhawan Agency, Near Railway Crossing- Badgaon, Beawar Road, Ajmer (Rajasthan) Partnership Firm Through Its Partners. 2. Shri Narendra Kumar Khandelwal S/o Late Shri Shivcharan Das Khandelwal, Aged About 71 Years, R/o M- 19, Sagar Vihar Colony, Vaishali Nagar, Ajmer (Rajasthan) 305001. 3. Shri Kishan Gopal Khandelwal S/o Shri Kalicharan Das Khandelwal, Aged About 63 Years, R/o 6/169, Vidhyadhar Nagar, Jaipur (Rajasthan) 302039 4. Shri Keshav Khandelwal S/o Late Shri Girdhar Gopal Khandelwal, Aged About 33 Years, R/o M-30, Sagar Vihar Colony, Vaishali Nagar, Ajmer (Rajasthan) 305001. Through Their Power Of Attorney Holder Shri Gaurav Khandwlwal Aged 39 Years S/o Shri Narendra Kumar Khandelwal And R/o M-19, Sagar Vihar Colony, Vaishali Nagar, Ajmer (Rajasthan) 305001 ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ashish Kishore Saksena through Video Conferencing Mr. Harshit Mittal For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL Order 06/07/2026 1. Instant writ petition has been filed by petitioners-defendants under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, arises out of a civil suit for specific performance, filed by respondents-plaintiffs, [2026:RJ-JP:25107] (2 of 2) [CW-2734/2026] challenging the order dated 22.01.2026 passed in Civil Suit No. 27/2025 by the trial Court, Ajmer, whereby an application for amendment in the plaint has been allowed. The challenge to the order has been made on the ground that proposed amendment alters the nature of suit drastically and substantially. 2. Counsel for both parties jointly submit that during course of this petition, parties have entered into mutual settlement but due to passing of interim stay order dated 11.02.2026 & pendency of this petition, it is not possible to get decide the suit finally and agreeable to get disposed of the suit in terms of settlement before the trial Court. A copy of settlement deed entered into between parties has been placed on record. 3. Thus, a joint prayer has been made that instant writ petition may be allowed to be withdrawn and interim stay order be vacated, so as to get decide the suit before the trial Court in terms of compromise. 4. In view of above, without interfering with the impugned order, instant writ petition stands disposed of as not pressed. 5. Interim stay order dated 11.02.2026 stands vacated. 6. All pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (SUDESH BANSAL),J 101/NITIN