IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.12233 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-301 Year-2025 Thana- AMARPUR District- Banka ====================================================== 1. Brajesh Kumar S/o Dayanand Panjiyara R/o Village - Nagardih, P.S - Fullidumar, District - Banka 2. Sittu Kumar S/o Dayanand Panjiyara R/o Village - Nagardih, P.S - Fullidumar, District - Banka ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Brijmohan Das, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Jharkhandi Upadhyay, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 2 12-03-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioners seek bail in connection with Amarpur (Fullidumar) P.S. Case No. 301 of 2025, instituted for the offences under Sections 223(2), 292 and 3/5 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 25(1-b)a and 27 of the Arms Act. 3. Prosecution story, in short, is that on 27.04.2025, the Police personnel found a viral video from the facebook I.D of Ahir Gaurav in which Sittu Kumar (Petitioner No.2) was seen holding country made pistol in his hands and petitioner No.1 Brajesh Kumar was seen holding a country made pistol in back of his waist. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that petitioners have falsely been implicated in the present case. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12233 of 2026(2) dt.12-03-2026 2/2 There was no allegation of firing or exploiting any one rather the petitioners have been seen with the country made pistols in the alleged video. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioners. There is nothing on record to show that the fire arms shown in the video are real. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that the petitioners are in custody since 05.12.2025 and have no criminal antecedent. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioners. 6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, as also the period of custody undergone by the petitioners, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioners. 7. Let the petitioners be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Amarpur (Fullidumar) P.S. Case No. 301 of 2025. manish/- (Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) U T