Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 94258 (MAD)

Malaichamy A v. The Revenue Divisional Officer

WP(MD)/22532/2025 · 2026-01-07

K Surender

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P.(MD)No.22532 of 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :07.01.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.SURENDER W.P.(MD)No.22532 of 2025 A.Malaichamy ... Petitioner(s) Vs. 1. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Melur, Situated at Narasingampatti, Melur Taluk, Madurai District. 2. The Tahsildar, Y.Narasingam, Y.Othakadai, Madurai East Taluk, Madurai District. 3. A.Selvakumar 4. P.Andichamy ... Respondent(s) PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the second respondent to execute the direction order passed in the proceedings O.Mu.No.9444/2023/A4 dated 04.01.2024 by the first respondent and to take action on the petitioner's application dated 29.07.2025. For Petitioner : Mr.V.Santhakumaresan 1/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.22532 of 2025 For Respondents :Mr.B.Ramanatha Addl. Government Pleader for R1 & R2 M/s.V.Kishore Kumar for R3 & R4 O R D E R This writ petition has been filed for issuance of a writ of mandamus, directing the second respondent to execute the order passed in the proceedings O.Mu.No.9444/2023/A4 dated 04.01.2024 by the first respondent and to take action on the petitioner's application dated 29.07.2025. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents. 3. The petitioner submitted an application dated 29.07.2025 to execute the order passed in the proceedings O.Mu.No.9444/2023/A4 dated 04.01.2024 by the first respondent. However, no action has been taken on the said representation. Hence, the present writ petition has been filed. 2/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.22532 of 2025 4. Learned Additional Government Pleader, appearing on behalf of the respondents 1 and 2, submits that the petitioner's representation would be considered on merits and in accordance with law. 5. In view of the above submissions, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the matter, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the second respondent to consider the petitioner’s representation dated 29.07.2025 on merits and in accordance with law and to pass appropriate orders within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 6. The representation shall be considered and disposed of after conducting an inquiry. The second respondent is further directed to afford a reasonable opportunity to the petitioner and to all other persons who may be affected by such decision during the course of the inquiry. There shall be no order as to costs. (K.SURENDER, J) 07.01.2026 NCC :Yes/No Internet :Yes/No Index :Yes/No PKN 3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.22532 of 2025 To 1. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Melur, Situated at Narasingampatti, Melur Taluk, Madurai District. 2. The Tahsildar, Y.Narasingam, Y.Othakadai, Madurai East Taluk, Madurai District. 4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.22532 of 2025 K.SURENDER, J. PKN W.P.(MD)No.22532 of 2025 07.01.2026 5/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis