Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9424 (GAU)

MD JAKIR ALI v. THE STATE OF ASSAM

Bail Appln./1913/2026 · 2026-07-14

Sanjeev Kumar Sharma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010142322026 2026:GAU-AS:9596 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./1913/2026 MD JAKIR ALI S/O- LT.ASHRAF ALI, R/O BEZERA ISLAMPUR, MANDAKATA, P.S-BAIHATA CHARIALI, DIST.-KAMRUP(R), ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE P.P ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. T CHUTIA, MS S NASRAT Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, Page No.# 2/3 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR SHARMA ORDER 15-07-20 26 Heard Mr. T. Chutia, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. P. Borthakur, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam. 2. This bail application has been filed by the petitioner, namely, Md. Jakir Ali under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023, seeking regular bail in connection with Basistha P.S. Case No. 178/2026 registered under Sections 308(5)(4)/3(5) of the BNS, 2023. 3. The allegation against the petitioner is that he alongwith with his associates used to extract money from the commercial vehicles which used to pass through Khanapara bound for Morigaon, Nagaon etc. on the pretext of collecting parking fees. 4. The earlier bail application being B.A. No. 1576/2026 was rejected by this Court vide order dated 24.06.2026. By now, however, the petitioner has been detained 43 days in custody and it is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that another co-accused has been granted bail by this Court by order dated 14.07.2026 passed in BA No.1884/2026. Considering the nature of the allegation and the period of detention, already undergone, the prayer for bail is allowed. 5. Accordingly, the petitioner named above shall be released on bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand) only with two sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Eleka Magistrate in connection with the aforementioned case. Page No.# 3/3 6. The direction for bail is further subject to the following conditions that: (i) the petitioner shall cooperate with the trial of the case regularly and he shall not try to hamper the investigation or tamper with the evidence of the case; (ii) the petitioner shall not try to influence or intimidate any person or the remaining witnesses, who are acquainted with the facts of the case, in any manner. 7. The bail application accordingly stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant