Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9423 (RAJ)

ANIL KUMAR S/O SUBHASH CHAND v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/9374/2026 · 2026-07-03

Anoop Kumar Dhand

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:24670] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.9374/2026 URN: CRLMB / 17247U / 2026 Anil Kumar S/o Subhash Chand, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Village Dilapur, Police Than Mandlera, District Jhujhunu, Presently Residing At Plot No.43, Ratan Sagar Colony, Isckon Road, Police Thana Patrakar Colony, Mansarover, Jaipur, Presently Proprietor Dynamic Manpower And Security Services, Jaipur. (At Present Confined In Central Jail Jaipur.) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anirudh Tyagi For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 03/07/2026 1. The instant bail application under Section 483 BNSS has been filed by the applicant in connection with the FIR No.145/2026 registered at the Police Station C.P.S. Jaipur, ACB District, wherein he is charged for offence punishable under Section 7A of the Prevention of Corruption Act. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is not a government servant, he is a private person. Learned counsel submits that he has been falsely booked in the instant case and he is in custody since 29.05.2026. He further submits that the trial will take its own time to conclude, so indulgence of bail be granted to the applicant. [2026:RJ-JP:24670] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-9374/2026] 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor opposed the bail application and submitted that the matter is still at the investigation stage. Hence, the applicant does not deserve indulgence of bail. 4. Heard and considered the submissions made at the Bar and perused the material available on record. 5. Considering the arguments put forward by learned Public Prosecutor and looking to the fact that since the matter is still at the stage of investigation, this Court is not inclined to entertain the instant bail application. Accordingly, the instant bail application stands dismissed. 6. However, the applicant would be at liberty to renew his prayer for bail after completion of investigation as well as submission of the charge-sheet. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J 2/Karan-Aayush