Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Sitender Singh v. Kishori Lal Fista
Cr.MPM No. 551 of 2026
18.05.2026 Present: Mr. Pritam Singh Chandel, Advocate, for the applicant/petitioner.
Mr. Kulbhushan Khajuria, Advocate, for the non- applicant/respondent.
Cr.MPM No. 551 of 2026
By way of instant application filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, prayer has been made by the applicant/petitioner for condonation of delay in maintaining the accompanying petition, which is barred by limitation.
Pursuant to notices issued in the instant proceedings, Mr. Kulbhushan Khajuria, Advocate, has filed power of attorney on behalf of the respondent. He states that he does not intend to file reply and has no objection to the afore prayer made by the applicant.
Accordingly, for the reasons stated in the application, this Court is convinced and satisfied that delay in maintaining the accompanying petition is neither intentional nor willful, rather same has occurred on account of circumstances, which were completely beyond the control of the applicant, as such, delay, which has been sufficiently explained, is condoned. The application is disposed of.
Cr.Revision No. of 2026
Be registered.
Notice. Mr. Kulbhushan Khajuria, Advocate, has filed power of attorney on behalf of the respondent. Record be called for.
Cr.MP No. of 2026 (CrMPST1570/26)
Notice in the aforesaid terms. Reply, if any, on or before the next date of hearing. In the meantime, substantive sentence imposed by the learned trial court shall remain suspended, subject to applicant’s depositing 50% of the compensation amount, which shall also include the amount already deposited and furnishing personal bonds in the sum of Rs. 25,000/- (rupees twenty five thousand only) with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court within six weeks.
May 18, 2026
(Sandeep Sharma),
manjit
Judge