Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9422 (GAU)

MAZAHARUL HOQUE v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS

WP(C)/994/2026 · 2026-07-14

Sanjay Kumar Medhi

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010031642026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/898/2026 MAZAHARUL HOQUE S/O SRI NURUL HOQUE, VILL. UPPER DUMDUMIA, P.O. BALISATRA, DIST. NAGAON, ASSAM. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE ADDL. CHIEF SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPTT., DISPUR, GUWAHATI -06. 2:THE SPECIAL SECRETARY PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI-06. 3:THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER NAGAON ZILLA PARISHAD NAGAON P.O. AND DIST. NAGAON. ASSAM 782001. 4:THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER DHING ANCHALIK PANCHAYAT P.O. DHING DIST. NAGAON ASSAM PIN- 782123 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. SURAJIT DUTTA, MR. D A KAIYUM,MR. M S MONDAL Advocate for the Respondent : SC, P AND R.D., Page No.# 2/3 Linked Case : WP(C)/994/2026 MAZAHARUL HOQUE S/O SRI NURUL HOQUE VILL. UPPER DUMDUMIA P.O. SANTIJAN DIST. NAGAON ASSAM. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE ADDL. CHIEF SECETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPTT. DISPUR GUWAHATI 06 2:THE SPECIAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI-06. 3:THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER NAGAON ZILLA PARIAHD NAGAON P.O. AND DIST. NAGAON ASSAM PIN-782001. 4:THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER KHAGORIJAN ANCHALIK PANCHAYAT P.O. KHAGORIJAN DIST. NAGAON ASSAM PIN- 782446 5:THE NAGAON ZILLA PARISHAD NAGAON Page No.# 3/3 REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT P.O. AND DIST. NAGAON ASSAM PIN-782001. ------------ Advocate for : MR. D A KAIYUM Advocate for : SC P AND R.D. appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI ORDER 15.07.2026 Shri M.S. Mondal, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that by efflux of time, both the matters have become infructuous. Also heard Shri S. Dutta, learned Standing Counsel, P&RD and Shri M. Chetia, learned State Counsel. Matters are accordingly closed as infructuous. JUDGE Comparing Assistant