[2026:RJ-JP:24249] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8810/2004 URN: CW / 14529U / 2004 Ramesh Chand Jain S/o Late Shri Prabhati Lal Jain, aged about 37 years, Resident of P.No.20, Kailashpuri, Behind Muslim School, Moti Dungri Road, Jaipur (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. Rajasthan Non-Government educational Tribunal, Mini Secre- tariat, Bani Park Jaipur through its presiding officer. 2. Director of Elementary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner. 3. Managing Committee, Anjuman Talimul Muslemeen, Moti Dun- gari Road Jaipur, through its Secretary. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : None present HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH Order 01/07/2026 None present on behalf of the petitioner even in the second round. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner challenging the order dated 14.06.2004 whereby the appeal filed on behalf of the petitioner was dismissed by the learned tribunal. I have perused the order dated 14.06.2004 passed by the learned tribunal. The tribunal while dismissing the appeal filed on behalf of the petitioner, in Para Nos. 26 & 27 observed as under:- Þ26- tgka rd izkFkhZx.k dh fu;qfDr dk lEcU/k gS] izkFkhZx.k dh fu;qfDr ,d ;kstuk ds rgr ,d fuf’pr osru ij vLFkk;h rkSj ls LVkbZQUM ij dh x;h Fkh ,slh lwjr esa] or jkT; ljdkj ds vU; [2026:RJ-JP:24249] (2 of 2) [CW-8810/2004] led{k v/;kid] xzsM&III ds in dk;Zjr deZpkfj;ksa dh Hkkafr osru ,oa HkÙks izkir djus ds vf/kdkjh ugha gSA izkFkhZx.k dks jkT; ljdkj ds led{k v/;kid] xzsM&III ds led{k v/;kid dh Js.kh esa ugha ekuk tk ldrk gSA 27- izkFkhZx.k dh fu;qfDr csjkstxkj ;qok&;qofr;ksa dks fuokZg HkÙkk ;kstuk ds vUrxZr dk;Z fn;k x;k Fkk] tks mUgksaus lkspdj] fyf[kr esa izLrqr dj Lohdkj fd;k] ,slh lwjr esa] vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk&20 ds izko/kku orZeku izdj.k esa ykxw ugha gksrh gSA izkFkhZx.k us pwafd] LosPNk ls vkosnu mifLFkr dj dk;Z fuokZg HkÙks ds vUrxZr fd;k Fkk rFkk vfHkys[k ij izLrqr nLrkostkrksa ls Hkh ;g fLFkfr mDrkuqlkj Li"V gks pqdh gS fd izkFkhZx.k dh fu;qfDr fof/kor~ p;u izfØ;k viukus ds ckn ugha dh x;h Fkh] cfYd LVkbZQUM ;kstuk ds vUrxZr dh x;h Fkh] vr% os mlds fo#) vc dqN Hkh djus ds fy;s fof/kuqlkj focaf/kr gSA izkFkhZx.k bu ifjfLFkfr;ksa esa] fu;fer osru izkIr djus ds vf/kdkjh ugha gS vkSj uk gh led{k in ij fu;fer osru izkIr djus ds vf/kdkjh ugha gS vkSj uk gh led{k in ij fu;fer deZpkjh dh Hkkafr osru ,oa HkÙks izkIr djus ds vf/kdkjh gSA bl izdkj] izkFkhZx.k ds ;s izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd;s tkus ;ksX; ugha gksus ds dkj.k [kkfjt fd;s tkus ;ksX; gSAÞ I am in complete agreement with the view taken by the tri- bunal. In that view of the matter, no case is made out for interfer- ence by this Court under Article 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India. Hence, this writ petition stands dismissed. (INDERJEET SINGH),J JYOTI/54