Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9411 (PNJ)

PARVEEN KUMAR v. STATE OF HARYANA

CRM-M/10095/2026 · 2026-05-05

Manisha Batra

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRM-M-10095-2026 -1-                            ! "#$#%&'()                            &  *+ ,- ,,                   !    "!    ###     , ). +/&    $      %  !    &'(   )  * +  +   ,-,( .   /)01 %   + ** * !% ! % *23 '4&  5( -4 ,-,& *      ,-  ,4    6 *     %  54'7. /01. ,8 6  8899 ! 1 !   :  ; *6    ; * ,    !!* 5( -4 ,-,& %         )!              (( +* 4-- *                 $   !!    <  *   PARVEEN SHARMA 2026.05.06 19:20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-10095-2026 -2-    )!      !               %% !    %         $+                   % !*            6     9 !  =* >          *       !! +    -8 -, ,-,7     !      %   +  !       ?   (         !!*    +   !   5' 5, ,-,&   !       @  !        ! %*   *         ?   ! A  !   !      *   5,---B?  ?    < %         !* ?  ! A !     !  $    -7 -( ,-,7 3 *   !   &   3  * %! !    % !! !      %  !      ?     %  %  %!         23  %C  %        !*   C     *  $  ! !! +  %!   !   ! -,    ,D   PARVEEN SHARMA 2026.05.06 19:20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-10095-2026 -3- %@    !   !%%    *         :?  +   !    %@ % % ! <   % !% ! 3    *      %!!  7     !   !  !! *         %    + *       *    !!*   !!! *       !!     !     %@ % % ! $  % * * ! @ %  % ! $         %!!  D   This Court has heard the rival submissions made by learned counsel for the parties at considerable length. 7. $ !!  !    !      :    !   *!  * % ! +               %!*  %!       E      !    E! +!  % * E  *     E           E  * % *! * !% !%!    % *   $     !!      %  3  ! C !! %!    %* % !  *      PARVEEN SHARMA 2026.05.06 19:20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-10095-2026 -4- 6    ! !!    !   (8     %     * (8 6           !C    % '   The petitioner along with the co-accused is alleged to be involved in the business of sale/purchase of contraband as he had purchased the contraband from co-accused Pankaj Ruhaila. The allegations levelled against the petitioner prima facie make out a case for commission of subject offences against him. However, he has been in custody since 05.03.2025. Co-accused have already been granted benefit of bail. The principle of parity also weighs in favour of the petitioner. $     !% ?  )!      !C    %  3    %%0%!@:      !          D8  6      %!    ! % %     ! F !    !       *      !! %     *      !      *  % *           3      %       :           %  (8 6      * *% !    :!!% %  * %  3       ! ! +! PARVEEN SHARMA 2026.05.06 19:20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-10095-2026 -5-  +!*  !  3       %  :               !    ! %  % + *          !  % !   *!     !!        %!% ! %      *!B  %     !  !:  B: 9   !*   B6  *    !! * ? . 1    !!     !    ! +         C                   . 1!! !             !  !:  . 1!!% !  !:       . 1!!     !%  *  !  !!   *       *  3<B<  .1  !!  !*   % !  % 3<B<!!+  % !  !!   4   3   % *23B !  !**    PARVEEN SHARMA 2026.05.06 19:20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-10095-2026 -6-   !!%    +!% ! * !  + *!! % ! 5-   3   !     %   % !! %  @        !!  !       ! 55        %!!  *!                  0, 1           '()                                PARVEEN SHARMA 2026.05.06 19:20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document