[2026:RJ-JP:10920] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1221/2026 Umraw Lal S/o Shri Sevaram, Aged About 62 Years, R/o Mator, Police Station Khairthal, District Khairthal-Tijara, Rajasthan, (Accused In Jail District Khairthal-Tijara Since 05.01.2026). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor (Pp) ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1785/2026 1. Dataram S/o Seva Ram, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Mator, Police Station Khairthal, District Khairthal-Tijara, Rajasthan (Accused In Jail District Khairthal-Tijara Since 05.01.2026). 2. Puran Singh S/o Data Ram, R/o Mator, Police Station Khairthal, District Khairthal-Tijara, Rajasthan (Accused In Jail District Khairthal-Tijara Since 05.01.2026). 3. Satpal S/o Umarav Lal, R/o Mator, Police Station Khairthal, District Khairthal-Tijara, Rajasthan (Accused In Jail District Khairthal-Tijara Since 05.01.2026). ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor (Pp) ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Prakash Chand Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP Mr. Rajneesh Gupta Mr. Deshraj Sain HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 16/03/2026 1. The instant bail applications have been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-applicants. The accused- [2026:RJ-JP:10920] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-1221/2026] applicants were arrested in connection with FIR No. 313/2025 registered at Police Station Khairthal District Khairthal-Tijara for the offence(s) under Sections 318(4), 316(5), 314, 3(5), 111(3) of BNS, Sections 3, 4, 5 of the Prize Chits and Money Circulation Schemes (Banning) Act, 1978 and Sections 3, 5, 6, 21, 23, 26 of the Banning of Unregulated Deposit Schemes Act, 2019. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-applicants submits that the applicants are in custody ever since 31.12.2025. It is submitted that the co-accused have already been enlarged on bail by the Coordinate Bench of this Court. Learned counsel further submits that the conclusion of trial is likely to take a long time and no useful purpose would be served by keeping the applicants behind bars till disposal of the case. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor along with learned counsel for the complainant have vehemently opposed the instant bail applications. It is submitted that the present is a case of organized crime, wherein a family has committed a fraud upon the investors, who are more than 4038 in numbers. It is also submitted that the fraud to the tune of approximately Rs.38 crores has been carried out as per the submissions put forth by learned counsel for the applicants, howsoever, vide the impugned order dated 12.01.2026, the same is reflected to the extent of approximately Rs.500 crores. Moreover, it is submitted that the investigation is still ongoing in the present case and if the accused-applicants are enlarged on bail, the ongoing investigation and the evidence will be hampered. 4. Having heard the arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the parties and considering the fact that the present is [2026:RJ-JP:10920] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-1221/2026] a case of organized crime; that as per the impugned order dated 12.01.2026, financial fraud to the tune of approximately Rs. 500 Crores has been carried out by the applicants; that the investigation is still ongoing in the present, considering the possibility of hampering the ongoing investigation and looking to the overall facts and circumstances of the case and material on record but without commenting on merits/demerits of the case, this court is not inclined to allow these bail applications of the accused-applicants. 5. Accordingly, the instant bail applications under Section 483 BNSS are dismissed. (SAMEER JAIN),J Pooja /31-32