331.2013CP 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 10 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 331 OF 2013 IN WP/3432/2012 SHANKAR NATHABHAU DOLE VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ... AGP for Respondent/State : Mr. S.J. Salgare CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE & VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV,JJ. DATE : 15.09.2026 ORDER (Per Vaishali Patil-Jadhav, J.): 1. None for the petitioner. 2. With the passage of time, it is presumed that the petitioner must have received the rental compensation. 3. Even otherwise, the petition is not even circulated from 2013. Thus, it appears that the grievance of the petitioner must have been redressed. 4. In view of the above, the contempt petition is disposed of with liberty that if at all the petitioner is aggrieved by the quantum of amount determined by respondent, it would be open for the petitioner to agitate the grievance by availing the appropriate remedy under law. [VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV] [SANDIPKUMAR C.MORE] JUDGE JUDGE sga 2026:BHC-AUG:42457