[2026:RJ-JP:24864] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9360/2026 URN: CRLMB / 17213U / 2026 Varis Son Of Ayyub, Aged About 22 Years, Resident Of Satpuda, Police Station Jurhara, District Deeg, Rajasthan. (At Present Accused-Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Deeg) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Surendra Singh For Respondent(s) : Ms. Manju Dave, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 03/07/2026 1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.23/2026 registered at Police Station Jurhera, District Deeg for offences under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 317(5), 303(2), 308(2), 313 and 61 (2)(a) of BNS, 2023 and Section 66D of IT Act. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He submits that similarly situated co-accused Hafeez has been released on bail by this Court on 01.04.2026. Co-accused Arwaz, Rohil, Sahadat and Munfed have also got the benefit of bail by Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 16.03.2026. Though one case has been reported against him as antecedent but in that case he has [2026:RJ-JP:24864] (2 of 4) [CRLMB-9360/2026] got the order of acquittal. The case of the present petitioner is on the same footing. Petitioner is behind the bars since 30.05.2026. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody and on the ground of parity with other co-accused, the bail application deserves to be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, the bail application filed under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner Varis Son Of Ayyub shall be released on bail on the following conditions:- 1. The accused-petitioner shall furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000 with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs. 50,000 each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court. 2. Within 15 days from the date of this order, the accused petitioner shall file an affidavit before the trial Court/ I.O. disclosing the following details: - (i) Moveable and immovable assets which includes land, buildings, vehicles, deposits, investments all bank accounts and digital wallets, UPI IDs cryptocurrency holdings etc. allegedly used in commission of the offence or which the accused-petitioner has in his name. [2026:RJ-JP:24864] (3 of 4) [CRLMB-9360/2026] (ii) The accused-petitioner shall submit complete transaction statements of all his active bank accounts, UPI IDs and digital payment instruments etc. after every 30 days till completion of the trial to the IO. 3. The accused shall not obtain/use any new SIM card, mobile phone or open new bank account etc. without the prior intimation to the Investigating Officer. 4. The accused-petitioner shall surrender his passport, if he has, before the trial Court immediately after being released on bail. The accused-petitioner shall not leave India without the prior permission of the trial Court. 5. The accused-petitioner shall not use any Virtual Private Network (VPN), TOR Browser, Proxy Server or any other form of anonymous network or identity masking technology without permission of IO. 6. The accused-petitioner shall submit to the Investigation Officer a comprehensive list of all electronic devices in his possession, including mobile phones, laptops, tablets, external hard disks and pen drive along with their IMEI numbers and serial numbers within 15 days of release under this bail order. 7. The accused-petitioner shall provide to the Investigating Officer details of all social media accounts, e-mail accounts, domain registration, websites and online platforms operated or used by the accused-petitioner. 8. The accused-petitioner shall not create any social media account in the name of any person, domain name or website without the prior intimation to the Investigation Officer. [2026:RJ-JP:24864] (4 of 4) [CRLMB-9360/2026] 9. The accused-petitioner shall mark his presence before the concerned police station once in 15 days as fixed by the Investigating Officer and a register shall be maintained for the same by Investigating Officer. 10. In case of any change of residential address, the accused petitioner shall immediately inform the Investigating Officer as well as the trial Court. 11. The accused-petitioner shall appear before the Investigating Officer whenever called upon and shall fully co-operate with the investigation. 12. The accused-petitioner shall not tamper with evidence, influence witnesses or attempt to obstruct the investigation in any manner whatsoever. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, failure to provide above information or such other information as desired by IO, shall be treated as a violation of the bail conditions, & further if the accused-petitioner is found to be involved in similar such cases within three years from the date of passing of this order, the public prosecutor shall move an application for cancellation of bail. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Chandan/75