IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19988 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-420 Year-2025 Thana- BHORE District- Gopalganj ====================================================== Dheeraj Singh @ Dheeraj Kumar Singh S/o- Hirdya Singh R/v- Nerui Ps- Mirganj Dist- Gopalganj ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Arvind Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ram Sevak Choudhary, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 2 01-04-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Bhore P.S. Case No. 420 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 109, 61 of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. 3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that the petitioner along with others, has fired at the informant. It is alleged that altogether eight gunshots were received by the informant. 4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. He also submits that from perusal of the injury report, it Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19988 of 2026(2) dt.01-04-2026 2/3 will transpire that the doctor conducting medical examination of the informant has only found multiple number of gunshots found on his body and has also reported that multiple numbers of bullets present in the body of the patient. Hence, injury is grievous in nature and caused by gunshot. He also submits that from perusal of the injury report, it is clear that the doctor has not mentioned in which part of the body the bullets were present and has simply stated that multiple number of gunshots were found in his body. He further submits that during the course of investigation, the informant has given his restatement in which he has stated that four persons, namely, Sahil Kumar, Balindra Yadav, Sunil Yadav and the petitioner who were hiding themselves near the road, came out, caught him and started firing at him. Altogether eight gunshots were fired at him. According to the version of the informant, the gunshots were made from blank range, but the injury report does not support the same. Moreover, the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 16.09.2025. 5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State and submits that the petitioner is having criminal antecedent of three cases. 6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19988 of 2026(2) dt.01-04-2026 3/3 considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M., Gopalganj in connection with Bhore P.S. Case No. 420 of 2025. Sudhanshu/- (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) U T