Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 93994 (MAD)

Kremmer Sandegren Foundation Pattukottai v. Dinesh Oliver Ponraj

CONT P(MD)/2394/2025 · 2026-01-23

G Jayachandran, N Senthilkumar

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CONT P(MD) No. 2394 of 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 23.01.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE G. JAYACHANDRAN AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SENTHILKUMAR CONT P(MD) No. 2394 of 2025 Kremmer Sandegren Foundation' Pattukottai, Represented by its President, A.Kamaleshwaran (Aged 42 years), (Registration No.5/57), No.70, Muduppaiah Colony, 4th Street, Veerakeralam, Coimbatore-641 007. ...Petitioner Vs Dinesh Oliver Ponraj, The Inspector General of Registration, O/o.The Inspector General of Registration, No.100, Santhome High Road, Foreshore Estate, Chennai-600 028. ...Respondent Prayer: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, to punish the contemnor for his deliberate, willful and intended disobedience in complying the direction of this Court dated 04.12.2024 passed in C.M.P.(MD)no.17367 of 2024 in W.A.(MD)No.2486 of 2024. For Petitioner : Mr.A.Raja For Respondent : Mr.Veera Kathiravan Additional Advocate General assisted by Mr.M.Lingadurai Additional Government Pleader 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CONT P(MD) No. 2394 of 2025 ORDER (Order of the Court was delivered by DR.G.JAYACHANDRAN, J.) This contempt petition is filed alleging disobedience of the order of this Court dated 04.12.2024 made in C.M.P.(MD)No.17367 of 2024 in W.A.(MD)No.2486 of 2024. 2.This contempt petition is filed as if the status quo order passed by this Court on 04.12.2024, had been violated by the contemnor by issuing an enquiry notice dated 06.05.2025. 3.The notice issued by the contemnor is in respect of an enquiry pursuant to the instructions given by the Court appointed Administrator and the status quo, which is ordered by this Court by way of an interim order, does not satisfy what status quo is meant for. 4.In such circumstances, we cannot presume that by issuing enquiry notice, the contemnor has violated the order passed by this Court. Unless the administration of the Society, which is the subject matter of the writ petition is disturbed, we are not inclined to entertain the contempt jurisdiction. Hence, this contempt petition stands dismissed. [G.J., J.] & [N.S., J.] 23.01.2026 Index :Yes/No ta 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CONT P(MD) No. 2394 of 2025 To The Inspector General of Registration, O/o.The Inspector General of Registration, No.100, Santhome High Road, Foreshore Estate, Chennai-600 028. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CONT P(MD) No. 2394 of 2025 DR. G. JAYACHANDRAN , J. AND N.SENTHILKUMAR, J. ta Cont.P.(MD)No.2394 of 2025 23.01.2026 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis