SAJJAD HUSSAIN AND 12 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
CRLP/20247/2026 · 2026-09-17
Padam Narain Mishra, Salil Kumar Rai
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 9398 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 9398 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 20247 of 2026 Court No. - 45 HON'BLE SALIL KUMAR RAI, J.
HON'BLE PADAM NARAIN MISHRA, J. Short counter affidavit filed on behalf of respondent No. 4 is taken on record. The present writ petition has been filed challenging the first information report dated 24.07.2026 registering Case Crime No. 0685 of 2026, under Sections 352, 115(2), 318(4), 351(3), 3(5), 338, 340(1), 340(2), 308(5) and 336(3) B.N.S., Police Station- Izzatnagar, District-Bareilly. It has been argued by the counsel for the petitioners that the dispute as raised in the writ petition is civil in nature and the first informant has the remedy before the civil court. It was further argued that no offence is made out against the petitioners on the recitals made in the first information report, therefore, the first information report is liable to be quashed. The A.G.A. representing the respondent Nos. 1 and 2 and Sri Amit Kumar Verma, Advocate, representing respondent No. 4 have opposed the writ petition. It would serve no purpose to keep the petition pending and issue notice to respondent No. 3. In the circumstances, we consider it appropriate and in the interest of justice to dispose of the writ petition with the direction that the petitioners shall not be arrested in pursuance to the first information report dated 24.07.2026 registering Case Crime No. 0685 of 2026, under Sections 352, 115(2), 318(4), 351(3), 3(5), 338, 340(1), 340(2), 308(5) and 336(3) B.N.S., Police Station-Izzatnagar, District-Bareilly till submission of police report under Section 173(2) Cr.P.C./193(3) B.N.S.S. provided the petitioners cooperate in the investigation. With the aforesaid direction, the writ petition is disposed of. September 18, 2026 Anurag/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vipin Gangwar Counsel for Respondent(s) : Amit Kumar Verma, G.A., Harish Chandra (Padam Narain Mishra,J.) (Salil Kumar Rai,J.) Sajjad Hussain And 12 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANURAG KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad