[2026:RJ-JP:25039] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8133/2026 URN: CRLMB / 14863U / 2026 Bishan Lal Swami S/o Jagdish Prasad Swami, Aged About 49 Years, R/o Thithawata Piran, Police Station Sadar Fatehpur, District Sikar, Rajasthan. (At Present Petitioner Is Confined In District Jail Sikar). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vipul Saxena Ms. Suwarna Saxena Mr. Saurabh Dubay Mr. Vivek Agrawal Mr. Ronak Prajapat For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP Mr. Rajesh Swami Mr. Waseem Akram HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 06/07/2026 1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.24/2026 registered at Police Station Fatehpur Sadar, District Sikar for offences under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 307, 109(1) and 3(5) of BNS, 2023. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor as well as learned counsel for the complainant and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He submits that though the allegation against the present petitioner is that he caused life- [2026:RJ-JP:25039] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-8133/2026] threatening injuries to the injured Parmanand. He further submits that as per the medical report, Injury Nos.1 and 2 were sustained on the right knee, while Injury Nos.3 and 4 were on the chest and lower back. He contends that according to the medical opinion, the injuries were not life-threatening though the possibility of their becoming life-threatening could not be ruled out in the absence of timely medical treatment. He further submits that it is not the prosecution's case that the injured Parmanand, was deprived of timely medical treatment. On the contrary, the material available on record indicates that the injured received prompt and timely medical treatment. Petitioner is behind the bars since 17.02.2026 without any criminal past. Charge-sheet has been filed. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody, consequently, the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor and learned counsel for the complainant have vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in light of submission made on behalf of petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner. 6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Bishan Lal Swami S/o Jagdish Prasad Swami, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before [2026:RJ-JP:25039] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-8133/2026] that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Chandan/38