Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9393 (AP)

Surakarapu Devi Padmavathi, v. Chillara Srinivas Rao

CRLRC/323/2021 · 2026-09-01

Y Lakshmana Rao

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010148032021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] WEDNESDAY, THE 2nd DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 323/2021 Between: 1. SURAKARAPU DEVI PADMAVATHI,, W/O SRINIVASA RAO, R/O.D.NO. 1173, 6TH LINE, SRINAGAR, GUNTUR ...PETITIONER AND 1. CHILLARA SRINIVAS RAO, S/O SAMBAIAH, R/O D.NO. 6-30/1/141, RAJAKA COLONY, GUNTUR. 2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. MOHAMMAD NAYAB RASOOL Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. KARANKI YASWANTH 2. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following: 2 ORDER Heard the learned Counsel for the Petitioner and the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor. Petitioner and Respondent No.1 are present. Sri T.Raghu Prasad, learned Counsel is appointed as learned Mediator in this case and has submitted mediator’s report. Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee is directed to issue necessary proceedings in this regard. In view of the mediator’s report, the Criminal Revision Case is disposed of as compromised. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. For complying the terms and conditions of the mediator’s report, post on 18.09.2026. _________________________ Dr. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Dt: 02.09.2026 VTS