Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9393 (ALL)

VIJAY NATH PANDEY ALIAS SURESH PANDEY v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

A227/11538/2026 · 2026-09-20

Vikram D Chauhan

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 11538 of 2026 Court No. - 55 HON'BLE VIKRAM D. CHAUHAN, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned AGA for the State. 2. The petition is filed with the following prayer: "1. Issue a order or direction setting aside the impugned order dated 30.07.2026 passed by the Civil Judge (Junior Division) / Fast Track Court-II Kaushambi in Miscellaneous Application No.250/2026 (Pratima Singh vs. Vijay Nath Pandey) under section 173(4) B.N.S.S and impugned order dated 10.08.2026 passed by Session Judge Kaushambi in Criminal Revision No. NIL/2026 (Vijay Nath Pandey vs. State of UP and another)." 3. It is submitted by learned counsel for petitioner that by order dated 30.7.2026, the trial court has passed the order directing the lodging of the First Information report. 4. Learned AGA has informed that in pursuance to order dated 30.7.2026, FIR has been lodged on 12.8.2026 and final report has been submitted in the present case on 7.9.2026. 5. In view of aforesaid, at this stage, no interference is warranted. 6. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of. September 21, 2026 D. Tamang Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Archit Mandhyan, Ravi Kant Verma Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Vikram D. Chauhan,J.) Vijay Nath Pandey Alias Suresh Pandey .....Petitioner(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- DHIRENDRA TAMANG High Court of Judicature at Allahabad