Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9392 (CHH)

DURGA NAND SAHU v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/771/2023 · 2026-04-27

Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:19704 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 771 of 2023 Durga Nand Sahu S/o Neerdhin Sahu Aged About 53 Years Resident Of Village Bodra Tahsil Gurur, District Balod Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Revenue Department, Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar Nawa Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 2 -Commissioner, Durg Division, District Durg Chhattisgarh. 3 -Collector, Balod, District Balod Chhattisgarh. 4 - Tahsildar, Gurur, District Balod Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For the Petitioner : None. For the respondent/State : Dr. Arham Siddiqui, PL. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hon'ble Mr. Amitendra Kishore Prasad, Judge Order on Board 28.04.2026 1. Learned State Counsel submits that petitioner is the encroacher of subject land and order of eviction has already been passed by the concerned Tahsildar on 07.08.2021 (Annexure P-1) and same has further been confirmed vide order dated 31.08.2021 (Annexure P- 2) by the concerned Sub-Divisional Officer and, thereafter, against 2 the order, the concerned Commissioner has also passed an order confirming the order of the Tahsildar for eviction from the suit property. Petitioner is encroacher and he is not any legally enforceable right, as such, on merits petitioner is not having any case in his favour. 2. Considering the above aspects of the matter, particularly the fact that no one appears on behalf of the petitioner and further considering this aspects that no interim order has been passed in favour of the petitioner, as such, it appears that order of eviction passed by the Tahsildar which has been confirmed by the concerned SDO as well as the Commissioner has attained its finality, hence, present petition seems to be rendered infructuous. 3. Accordingly, the instant petition stands dismissed as having become infructuous. CC as per rules. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge J.