( 2026:JHHC:12272 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 561 of 2026 ------ Gudar Yadav @ Nitish Kumar Yadav, aged about 20 years, son of Dindayal Yadav, resident of Village-Mahadevganj, P.O.-Gangaprasad, P.S.-Sahibganj (Muffasil), Dist.-Sahibganj … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Gautam Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Someshwar Roy, Addl. P.P. For the Informant : Mr. Ayush Kr. Verma, Advocate ------ Order No.04 Dated- 27.04.2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with Sahibganj (M) P.S. Case No.26 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under sections 118(2)/109/351(3)/3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and under Section 27 of Arms Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner files the supplementary affidavit. Keep the same in the record. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner in furtherance of common intention with the co-accused persons attempted to murder the informant and the daughter of the informant. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the informant that the matter has been settled between the petitioner and the informant with the intervention of friends and well-wishers and in this respect, learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the informant draws the attention of this Court to the copy of the compromise petition filed by the parties in the court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sahibganj. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 19.09.2025, as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 01 of the bail application. It is next submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case and further undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the co-accused person with similar allegation has already been admitted to bail by a coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 07.08.2025 in B.A. No.6517 of 2025. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail. The learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the abovenamed petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M., Sahibganj, in connection with Sahibganj (M) P.S. Case No.26 of 2025 with the condition that the petitioner will cooperate with the trial of the case and will furnish his mobile number and a copy of his Aadhar Card in the court below with the undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case, with further condition that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 27.04.2026 Gunjan-