SMT. LEKKALA VENKATAPADMA v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
WP/9458/2026 · 2026-04-23
Y Lakshmana Rao
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 939 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 939 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010185712026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] FRIDAY,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 9458/2026 Between:
SMT. LEKKALA VENKATAPADMA, W/O L. YERAKAYYA, PERMANENT RESIDENT OF D/O 1-54, K.O. MALLAVARAM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. PRESENTLY RESIDING AT D.NO.8-272/18/2, IN S.NO.10, ACC CEMENT SHEET SHED, GOPALAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,
HOME DEPARTMENT, AP SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI.
2. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT.
3. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR, , GOPALAPATNAM P.S., VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT.
4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, GOPALAPATNAM P.S, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner:
ARRABOLU SAI NAVEEN Counsel for the Respondent(S):
GP FOR HOME
2 Dr. YLR, J W.P.No.9458 of 2026 Dated 24.04.2026
The Court made the following:
ORDER:
The Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief:-
“…to issue an appropriate Writ Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of respondents 2 to 4 in not registering the complaint dated 04 04 2026 as illegal arbitrary unconstitutional and in violation of statutory duties and consequently direct the respondents to register an FIR for the offences punishable under Sections 329 criminal trespass 324 5 mischief causing damage 115(2) voluntarily causing hurt 74 assault or criminal force to woman 303(2) theft 352 intentional insult and 351 (2)(3) criminal intimidation all read with Section 190 unlawful assembly with common object of BNS 2023 and to take appropriate action in accordance with law and pass….”
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader.
3. Mr. Arrabolu Sai Naveen, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the action of respondent No.4 in not registering the FIR, despite the petitioner submitting the representation dated 04.04.2026.
4. Sri P. Ajay Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader, on written instructions, submits that the complaint of the petitioner dated 04.04.2026 is registered as a case in Cr.No.115 of 2026 for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 329(3), 324(2), 79, 115(2), 191(2), and 303(2) read with Sections 49 and 190 of ‘the BNS’ by the Station House Officer, Gopalapatnam Police Station.
3 Dr. YLR, J W.P.No.9458 of 2026 Dated 24.04.2026
5. Considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case, and recording the submissions of the learned Assistant Government Pleader, the Writ Petition is disposed of, directing the respondent No.4 to bring the investigation to a logical conclusion by filing appropriate proceedings before the learned jurisdictional Magistrate, in accordance with law, as early as possible in accordance with law.
6. With the above observations and directions, the Writ Petition is
disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ DR. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Date: 24.04.2026 RSI
4 Dr. YLR, J W.P.No.9458 of 2026 Dated 24.04.2026
77 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 9458 of 2026
Date: 24.04.2026 RSI