RAKESH SAINI URF MALYA S/O BHIWARA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/9321/2026 · 2026-07-06
Anoop Kumar Dhand
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 9389 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 9389 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:25038] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.9321/2026 URN: CRLMB / 17100U / 2026 Rakesh Saini Urf Malya S/o Bhiwara, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Ward No. 03 Laptaniyo Ka Mohhalla Viratnagar, Police Thana Viratnagar Dist Kotputli Behror (Accused At Presently Confined In Kotputli) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan through its P.P., Kotputli Raj ----Respondent For Applicant(s) : Mr. Omveer Singh Saini For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND
Order 06/07/2026
1. The instant bail application under Section 483 BNSS has been filed by the applicant in connection with the FIR No.91/2026 registered at the Police Station Virat Nagar, District Kotputli-Behror, wherein he is charged for the offences punishable under Section 8/21 of the NDPS Act.
2.
Learned counsel for the applicant submits that Tramadol capsules containing weight of 146.91gms has been effected at the instance of the applicant, which is less than the commercial quantity i.e. 250gms. Learned counsel submits that the petitioner is not having any criminal antecedents and no other case has been registered against him. Learned counsel submits that he is in
[2026:RJ-JP:25038] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-9321/2026] custody since 13.05.2026 and the trial will take its own time to conclude, so indulgence of bail be granted to the applicant.
3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor opposed the bail application and submitted that the matter is still at the investigation stage. Hence, the applicant does not deserve indulgence of bail.
4. Heard and considered the submissions made at the Bar and perused the material available on record.
5. Considering the arguments put forward by learned Public Prosecutor and looking to the fact that since the matter is still at the stage of investigation, this Court is not inclined to entertain the instant bail application. Accordingly, the instant bail application stands dismissed.
6. However, the applicant would be at liberty to renew his prayer for bail after completion of investigation and submission of the charge-sheet.
(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J 27/Karan