IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 17.03.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R. SAKTHIVEL CMP.No. 643 of 2008 in S.A.No. 666 of 2005 ---- Chockalingam Chettiar S/o.Muthuchidambaram 2.Vaithilinga Chettiar S/o.Muthuchidambaram ...Petitioners/Appellants Versus G.Murugesan (died) ...1st Respondent 1.G.Ulaganathan S/o. Govindasamy Padayachi ...1st Respondent/ 2nd Respondent 2.Arulmighu Marga Sahaya Eswaraswami Temple Rep. By its Executive Officer Nayaganaipiriyal Village. ...2nd Respondent/ 3rd Respondent L.Rs of G.Murugesan: 3.G.M. Rajammal W/o.G.Murugesan 4.M.Mannagaran S/o.G.Murugesan 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 5.M.Rajkumar S/o.G.Murugesan 6.M.Sambathkumar S/o.G.Murugesan 7.V.Vijayalakshmi W/o. Vijayakumar 8.M.Elavarasan S/o.G.Murugesan 9.M.Devi D/o.G.Murugesan ...Respondents/ 3rd Parties 3 to 9/ Proposed Respondents 4 to 10 Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Petition filed under Order XXII Rule 4 read with Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, praying to bring on record the respondents 3 to 9 herein, who are the legal-heir(s)/legal representative(s) of the deceased first respondent in the above second appeal as respondents 4 to 10 in the above second appeal. For Petitioners : Mrs.A.Nilaphar For Ms.R.Meenal --- 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ORDER This Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed to bring on record the Respondent Nos.3 to 9 herein, who are the legal-heir(s)/legal representative(s) of the deceased first respondent in the above second appeal as Respondent Nos. 4 to 10 in the above second appeal. 2.Mrs.A.Nilaphar, representing Ms.R.Meenal, Counsel on record for the petitioners is before this Court. 3.In this application, notice has been duly served to the Respondent No.3 and 5 to 8. 4.Notice sent to the Respondent Nos.4 and 9 was returned with an endorsement as “No Such Addressee”. 5.Considering the nature of this petition, considering the fact that the notice to the Respondent Nos.3 and 5 to 8 were served. 6.This Court is of the view that the substantial representation is sufficient for the deceased first respondent. Hence, this Court is inclined to allow this Civil Miscellaneous Petition. 7.Accordingly, this Civil Miscellaneous Petition is allowed. 17.03.2026 MSM Note: Registry is directed to carry out necessary amendment in the Memorandum of Grounds of Appeal. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis R.SAKTHIVEL, J MSM CMP.No.643 of 2008 in S.A.No. 666 of 2005 17.03.2026 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis