(1) 909 CP-335.2013.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 909 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 335 OF 2013 IN WP/3437/2012 MANIK AMBADAS POKHARKAR VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS --------------------------------------------------------------------------- None for the petitioner. Mr. S.J. Salgare, A.G.P. for respondent – State. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ. DATED : 16th September, 2026 Order (Per Vaishali Patil-Jadhav, J.) : 1. None for the petitioner. 2. With the passage of time, it is presumed that the petitioner must have received rental compensation. 3. Even otherwise also, the petition is not circulated after 2013. Thus, it appears that the grievance of the petitioner must have been redressed. 4. In view of above, the contempt petition is disposed of with liberty that if at all the petitioner is aggrieved by the quantum of amount determined by the respondent, it will be open for the petitioner to agitate the grievance by availing appropriate remedy under law. (VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV) (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) JUDGE JUDGE VD_Dhirde