Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9385 (KAR)

MR. J. A. HAMSA v. MR. K. M. SIDDARTHA

CRL.RP/133/2023 · 2026-03-11

V Srishananda

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14478 CRL.RP No. 133 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 133 OF 2023 (397(Cr.PC) / 438(BNSS) BETWEEN: MR. J.A. HAMSA AGED 60 YEARS S/O JOYIOPRE ALI COFFEE MERCHANT R/AT HALGUNDA VILLAGE AMATTHI NAD, VIRAJPET TALUK KODAGU DISTRICT - 571 218. …PETITIONER (BY SRI AKASH, ADV., FOR SRI RAJARAMA S, ADV.) AND: MR. K.M. SIDDARTHA S/O LATE SHRI MUTTHAPPA AGED 59 YEARS R/AT KATTEMADU VILLAGE MADIKERI TALUK KODAGU DISTRICT - 571 201. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI LAKSHA KALAPPA B, ADV., FOR LRs OF DECEASED RESPONDENT) THIS CRL.RP IS FILED U/S.397 R/W 401 CR.P.C BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING THAT THIS HONBLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER DATED 19.10.2022 IN CRL.A.NO.34/2019 PASSED BY THE I ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, KODAGU AT MADIKERI AND THE JUDGMENT OF CONVICTION AND SENTENCE DATED 05.07.2019 IN C.C.NO.184/2012 PASSED BY THE PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC AT MADIKERI AND MAY BE ACQUITTED THE PETITIONER/ACCUSED FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S.138 OF NI ACT. Digitally signed by NANDINI M S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14478 CRL.RP No. 133 of 2023 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL ORDER Learned counsel Sri Aakash, for Sri. Rajaram, learned counsel for the petitioner is present. 2. The respondent / complainant died. Time was granted to substitute the dependants of original complainant on record by filing necessary application. However, the same was not filed and therefore, as a last chance on payment of cost of ₹.1,000/- time was granted by order dated 14.10.2025. The said order is not complied by the counsel for the revision petitioner. 3. Taking note of the fact that the revision petition is of the year 2023 and in the absence of dependants of the original complainant being brought on record, petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE NMS/List No.: 1 Sl No.: 7